Tindak Pidana Pencurian Benda Sakral dalam Putusan Pengadilan di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Tinggi Bali

I Gusti Ngurah Oka Putra Setiawan

doi:10.26905/idjch.v9i1.2618

Tindak Pidana Pencurian Benda Sakral dalam Putusan Pengadilan di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Tinggi Bali

I Gusti Ngurah Oka Putra Setiawan

Abstract

Theft of sacred objects (pratima) that occur in the jurisdiction of Bali lately is very disturbing to the Balinese people. Because for the Balinese people who are Hindus, the theft of sacred objects (pratima) has a negative effect on everyday life which results in disruption of the balance between real (sekala) and supernatural (niskala). This type of writing is normative juridical or dogmatic legal sciences. In the process of resolving cases of theft of sacred objects (pratima), judges use Article 362 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) as a guideline for imposing penalties on perpetrators. In the view of Balinese people who are Hindus, the perpetrators should be given additional penalties in the form of customary sanctions so that the perpetrators know that the actions committed are fatal and can result in imbalances in the realm of the village where they commit theft, because to restore imbalances These Balinese people who are Hindus must prepare a very large ceremony (upakara) in the form of preparing offerings or offerings called (prayascitta).

How to cite item: Setiawan, I. (2018). Tindak Pidana Pencurian Benda Sakral dalam Putusan Pengadilan di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Tinggi Bali. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 9(1), 79-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i1.2618

Keywords

Theft, Skral Objects (Pratima), Customary Sanctions, Prayascitta.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali, Achmad. 2015. Meguak Teori Hukum (Legal Thoery) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence). Cetakan 6. Jakarta. Prenamedia Group.

Alper, Benedict S. 1973. Changing Concept of Crime and Criminal Policy. Resource Material Series No.6 UNAFEI .

Ancel, Marc. 1965. Social Defence, A Modern Approach to Criminal Problems. London. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Areif, Barda Nawawi. 1996. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Astiti, Tjokorda Istri Putra. Implikasi Sanksi Adat Bali Dalam Konteks Penegakan HAM. Makalah disampaikan pada acara diskusi publik yang diselenggarakan oleh PBHI pada tanggal 5 November 2007. Denpasar.

Bonger, W. A. 1995. Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi. Jakarta. Pembangunan.

Darma, I Made Wirya. 2012. Kebijakan Formulasi Norma Pencurian Benda-Benda Sakral Dalam KUHP Indonesia. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pendidikan Nasional (Undiknas). Denpasar. Vol. 2, 10 Januari 2012.

Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 157 tahun 2009 dan Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar No.88/ PN. Dps/K.S/1981, tanggal 8 Juni 1981.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar No. 42/Pid.B/2011/PN.Gir., tanggal 13 Mei 2011.

Sandika, I Ketut. 2011. Pratima Bukan Berhala. Surabaya. Paramita.

Tribunnews. 2015. Pencuri Pratima Pura dihukum 2 Tahun penjara. tribunnews.com/2015/06/04/2-pencuri-pratima-pura-dihukum-2-tahun-penjara. diakses tanggal 14 Februari 2018. pukul 09.43.

Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. 2013. Hukum Konsep dan Metode. Malang. Setara Pres.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i1.2618