Contradictory Impartiality Principle in the Supervisory System of Constitutional Court Judges

Ali Prakosa, Pompy Polansky Alanda, Nurul Istianah, Luthcas Rohman

Abstract


The Constitutional Court (MK) through Its Verdict No.  1-2 / PUU-XII / 2014 substantially causes a legal vacuum (rechtsvacum) serving as the basis for the constitutional judge's external supervisory body.  Besides that, with the application of the Constitutional Court's supervisory system through the Ethics Council and the Constitutional Court Honorary Council (MKMK) is considered to have deviated the principle of nemo judex idoneus in propria causa because one of the members of the MKMK was a constitutional judge, means hearing his own case.  The research method used is the normative legal research method with the statue approach and conceptual approach. Supervision of Constitutional Court judges requires Reinventing (legal reform) by involving members of the Supreme Court and members of the House of Representatives as members of the Ethics Council and replacing one Constitutional Judge with one former Supreme Court Judge.  The supervision change of the Constitutional Court judges is aimed to increase the authority of the Constitutional Court and to hold the principle of impartiality.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i2.3470.


Keywords


Supervision; Nemo Judex Idoneus In Propria Causa Principle; Impartiality Principle.

References


Ashar, Ahmad. 2009. Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengangkatan Hakim Agung Berdasarkan pada UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial, Jurnal DAHA, Vol. 1 No. 42, Januari 2009.

Fitri, Rahma. 2018. Pelanggaran Etik dan Hak Pribadi dalam Kasus Kode Etik di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal RechtsVinding, Maret 2018.

Ihsanuddin. 2013. 9 Alasan Majelis Kehormatan Berhentikan Akil Mochtar. https://kompas.com/nasional/read/2013/11/01/1244259/9.Alasan.Majelis.Kehormatan.Berhentikan.Akil.Mochtar. diakses pada tanggal 03 Nopember 2019.

Jailani, Sofyan. 2012. Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Berdasar Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 6 No. 3, September-Desember 2012.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar dan Arif Sidharta. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Buku I. Bandung. Alumni.

Lumbun, Gayus. 2013. Tentang Pembaruan Pengadilan Khusus dalam Perspektif Mahkamah Agung, Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial. Jakarta. Komisi Yudisial.

Machmudin, Dudu Duswara. 2006. Peranan Keyakinan Hakim dalam Memutus suatu Perkara di Pengadilan. Jurnal Varia Peradilan MA RI, Vol. 25 No. 2, Oktober 2006.

Maladi, Yanis. 2010. Benturan Asas Nemo judex idoneus in propria causa dan Asas Ius Curia Novit (Telaah Yuridis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006). Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 7 No. 2, April 2010.

Malysz, Piotr J. 2007. Nemo iudex in causa sua as the Basis Of Law, Justice And Justifications In Luther’s Thought. HTR Harvard Divinity School, Vol. 100 No. 3, Juni 2007.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2012. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. Prenamedia Group.

Muchlis. 2008. Hubungan Komisi Yudisial dengan Mahkamah Agung dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Jurnal Suloh, Vol. 6 No. 2, September 2008.

Muhtadi. 2015. Problematika Yuridis Sistem Alokasi Hukum dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 9 No. 2.

Santosa, Mas Achmad. 2007. Perspektif Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006. Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1 No. 2, Desember 2007.

Simabura, Charles. 2009. Membangun Sinergis dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 7 No. 2, Juli 2009.

Sutiyoso, Bambang. 2011. Penguatan Peran Komisi Yudisial dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 18 No. 2, April 2011.

Syahayani, Zihan. 2014. Pembaharuan Hukum dalam Sistem Seleksi dan Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya.

Tutik, Titik Triwulan. 2012. Pengawasan hakim konstitusi dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 2, Mei 2012.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
Faculty of Law University of Merdeka Malang



Information
EDC, Punjabi UniversityFaculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64, Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.
Phone (0341) 580161 & Faks (0341) 588395
bhou http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jch/
jurnalcakrawalahukum@unmer.ac.id
@jurnalcakrawalahukum
@Jcakrawalahukum
WhatsApp Android Emoji, smudge, mobile Phones, smudge, android png ... +6285234880048

Statistics
Indexed in
indexwidth="145" width="150"
INDEX COPERNICUS INTERNATIONAL Hasil gambar untuk ebscohost png
ResearchBib

Tools
Turnitin
crossref
MendeleyGrammarly

Supported By
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang


Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License. Licensed under  Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright ©2020 University of Merdeka Malang Powered by Open Journal Systems.