Analisis peraturan perkawinan beda agama di berbagai negara sebagai perlindungan hukum untuk membentuk keluarga

Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti, Enny Ristanty


The validity of interfaith marriages for Indonesian citizens is not regulated in the provisions of Law No. 1 of 1974 as amended by Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning marriages, while the fact of citizens who engage in interfaith marriages is increasing. A comparative study of marriage regulations in several countries aims to gain holistic knowledge and understanding of the regulations governing marriages, specifically the similarities and differences in marriages of different religions. So that the future can be used as input in regulating the rules of interfaith marriages in Indonesia. The research method used to analyze this study is normative legal research because it uses a comparative approach to law in several countries. The results show that the validity of marriages in several countries such as the USA, Australia, Singapore and the Netherlands is done through registration. Almost all countries used as objects of study regulate interfaith marriages. So that the protection of the right to form a family is guaranteed. Turkey which has similarities with Indonesia regulates interfaith marriages.



Interfaith Marriage; Comparison of Norms; Right to Form a family.


Bowman, Cyintia Grant. 1996. A Feminist Proposal to Bring Back Common Law Marriage.

Funaro, Patty. 2005. Legislative Guide to Marriage Law, legislative Services Agency. patty.funaro@legis.stat.

Barwick, G. The Commonwealth Mariage Act 1961. Melbourne University Law Review, Vol 3, 1961-1962. https: // History of marriage Laws in Australia.

http: wikipedia/matrimonial law of Singapore.

http: Interfaith marriage. Interfaith Marriages on rise in the United States.

http;// 20 intriguing interfaith marriage statistic.

http;// Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga di Turki.

Indrayanti, K. (2016). Penetapan dan pencatatan perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia yang berkeadilan dan berkemanusian. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(2), 195-205. doi:10.26905/idjch.v7i2.1908.

Islam, Md. Zahidul. Interfaith Marriage In Islam And Present Situation. Global Journal of Politics and Law Research. Vol.2, No. 1.

Keputusan Mahkamah Konstistusi Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014.

Keputusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Nomor 527/Pdt/P/2009/P.N. Bgr.

Meta, K. (2013). Pengangkatan sentana rajeg dalam perspektif hukum perkawinan adat Bali. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 18(2). doi:10.26905/idjch.v18i2.1120.

Pramasantya, O. (2017). Perjanjian perkawinan pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 8(2), 191-200. doi:10.26905/idjch.v8i2.1671.

Peter de Cruz. 2010. Perbandingan Sistem Hukum , Common Law, Civil Law dan Socialist Law. Bandung. Nusa Media.

Putro, Widodo Dwi dan Herlambang Wiratrasman. Penelitian Hukum: Anatra Yang Normatif dan Empiris. Episterma Digest. Vol 5. 2015.

Undang –Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

www. Interfaith Marriage. Marriage Law- Nederlands.

Full Text: Full Text


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum
Faculty of Law University of Merdeka Malang

EDC, Punjabi UniversityFaculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64, Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.
Phone (0341) 580161 & Faks (0341) 588395
WhatsApp Android Emoji, smudge, mobile Phones, smudge, android png ... +6285234880048

Indexed in
indexwidth="145" width="150"
INDEX COPERNICUS INTERNATIONAL Hasil gambar untuk ebscohost png


Supported By
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License. Licensed under  Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright ©2020 University of Merdeka Malang Powered by Open Journal Systems.