A comparative study of the efficiency of conventional and Sharia insurance in Indonesia

Dewi Rekno Ulansari, Dina Fitrisia Septiarini

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze the value of efficiency and the comparison of efficiency ratio in conventional insurance companies and Islamic Sharia Business Unit (ISBU) of Sharia insurance, both life and general insurance, in Indonesia from 2011-2018. The input variables used are total capital and total expenses. While the output variables in this study were total income. The method used to obtain efficiency value for each insurance industry was Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). The result of efficiency value from the conventional insurance companies and ISBU Sharia insurance would be compared by using independent sample t-test statistic tests. The population in this research was all conventional insurance companies, both life and general, and all life and general insurance of ISBU Sharia insurance that registered in the web of Financial Services Authority (FSA). The sample used was 28 conventional insurance companies consisting of 21 life insurance companies and seven general insurance companies, and 12 ISBU Sharia insurance consisting of nine Sharia life insurance and three Sharia general insurance. This research resulted that there was no difference in efficiency value between conventional insurance companies and ISBU Sharia insurance.

JEL Classification: C73, G22, L15

 

How to Cite:

Ulansari, D. R., & Septiarini, D. F. (2020). A comparative study of the efficiency of conventional and Sharia insurance in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(2), 202-213.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v24i2.3165


Keywords


Conventional insurance; Efficiency; Sharia insurance; Stochastic Frontier Analysis

References


Ahmad, W. M. A. W., Nawi, M. A. A., & Aleng, N. A. (2013). Relative efficiency analysis industry of life and general insurance in Malaysia using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). Applied Mathematical Sciences, 7, 1107-1118. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2013.13100

Almulhim, T. (2019). Analysis of Takaful vs. Conventional insurance firms’ efficiency: Two-stage DEA of Saudi Arabia’s insurance market. Journal Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1633807

Antonio, M. S., Ali, M. M., & Akbar, N. (2013). A comparative analysis of the efficiency of Takaful and Conventional insurance in Malaysia. The International Journal of Excellence in Islamic Banking and Finance, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.12816/0001416

Battese, G. E. & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01205442

Coelli, T., Estache, A., Perelman, S., & Trujillo, L. (2003). A primer on efficiency measurement for utilities and transport regulators. World Bank Institute Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5379-9

Effendi, J. (2018). Islamic insurance: A potential niche market of Indonesia Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah (Journal of Islamic Economics), 10(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v10i1.5330

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Faradilla. (2014). Pengukuran efisiensi pada perusahaan asuransi go public di Indonesia: pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Theses. Faculty of Economics. Universitas Syah Kuala Darussalam. Banda Aceh.

Firdaus, M. F., & Hosen, M. N. (2014). Efisiensi bank umum syariah menggunakan pendekatan Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, 16(2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v16i2.31

Jarraya, B., & Bouri, A. (2013). Efficiency concept and investigations in insurance industry: A survey. Management Science Letters, 4(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2012.11.010

Kumbhakar, S. C., & Knox, L. C. A. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Mihaiu, D. M., Opreana, A., & Cristescu, M. P. (2010). Efficiency, effectiveness, and performance of the public sector. Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, 0(4), 132-147.

Rahman, M. A. (2013). Comparative study on the efficiency of Bangladeshi Conventional and Islamic Life Insurance: A Non-parametric Approach. Asian Business Review, 3(2), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v3i2.91

Rao, G. S. S. B., & Venkateswarlu, R. (2014). Efficiency of Indian private non-life insurance firms using stochastic Frontier Analysis. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(1), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0414246

Shafique, M. N., Ahmad, N., & Ahmad, H. (2015). A Comparative study of the efficiency of Takaful and Conventional insurance in Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting Research, 2(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12816/0014605

Tuffahati, H., Mardian, S., & Suprapto, E. (2016). Pengukuran efisiensi asuransi syariah dengan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Islam, 4(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.35836/jakis.v4i1.27


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




rsz_8th_ifma rsz_6th_perbanas_conference rsz_the_6th_indonesian_finance_association_international_conference


Journal of Finance and Banking

Diploma Program of Banking and Finance
Faculty of Economics and Business University of Merdeka Malang

Mailing Address:

2nd-floor Banking and  Finance Building, Terusan Raya Dieng Street No.57 Malang, 65146, East Java, Indonesia
Phone/WhatsApp: +628123321664; Fax. +62 341 580511
Email:
jkpunmermlg@yahoo.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.