What Makes It Difficult for Free Trade Agreements to Apply In Indonesia

Shinta Ayu Sri Yunindhar; Siti Nuryanah

doi:10.26905/ap.v9i2.10009

What Makes It Difficult for Free Trade Agreements to Apply In Indonesia

Shinta Ayu Sri Yunindhar, Siti Nuryanah

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the reasons why free-trade agreements are difficult to apply in Indonesia by analyzing tax disputes over certificates of origin (CoO). The fulfillment of the CoO requirements determines whether import duty reduction in the free trade agreement can be granted. This research is a case study of customs audits and re-examinations using content analysis and semi-structured interviews. Primary data will be obtained through semi-structured interviews conducted with the Auditor’s Representative, Audit Quality Supervisor, and Audit Results Evaluator. The secondary data used were from 150 tax court decisions. The results showed that there are still evidentiary problems, unclear procedures, differences in understanding of the rules, and rationalization from importers on the use of CoO. This condition is supported by differences in judges' beliefs in deciding disputes. This research contributes to the consideration of auditors and importers in handling CoO examinations, regulators in making and updating policies, and judges in deciding disputes.

Keywords

audit; certificate of origin; free trade agreement; tax disputes

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anta Kusuma, I. G. K. C. B. (2019). Menakar Kualitas Pemeriksaan Pajak Dalam Sengketa Pajak. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 2(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v2i1.545

Ardiansyah, A. (2022). Application of the Load of Proof in Customs Value Disputes Reviewing From Customs Law and Tax Law (Analysis Of The Decision Of The Supreme Court Number 1965/B/PK/PJK/2018). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1066–1076.

Augier, P., Gasiorek, M., & Lai Tong, C. (2005). The impact of rules of origin on trade flows. Economic Policy, 20(43), 567–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00146.x

Avianti, A., Komarasari, I., & Widodo, A. (2023). ANALISIS SENGKETA PAJAK PENGHASILAN BADAN ATAS KOREKSI BIAYAPROMOSI BAGI END-USER ( STUDI KASUS PT SAF TAHUN 2018 ). Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v10i2.1019

Brenton, P., & Manchin, M. (2003). Making EU trade agreements work: The role of rules of origin. World Economy, 26(5), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00545

Cantin, F. P., & Lowenfeld, A. F. (1993). Rules of Origin , The Canada-U . S . FTA , and the Honda Case. The American Journal of International Law, 87(3), 375–390.

Elisabeth, M. S. (2016). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak Dalam Transfer Pricing atas Intangible Property dan Intra-Group Services di Pengadilan Pajak Indonesia (Studi Kasus Pada Beberapa Sengketa). Universitas Indonesia.

Estevadeordal, A. (1999). Negotiating Preferential Market Access: The Case of NAFTA. In Journal of World Trade (Vol. 34, Issue June).

Fahri, A., Pranacitra, R., & Santoso, I. (2022). Pembebanan Preferential Tariff Skema Asean Trade In Goods Agreement (ATIGA) Berdasarkan Operational Certification Procedurs. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(3), 9773–9783. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i3.3236

Firmantoro, K. (2022). Negligence Of Customs and Excise in the Implementation of Judicial Decisions on Audit Result Disputes that can Cause Country Loss and Business Actors (A Study On Court Decision No. 46/Pk/Tun/2011 Which Has Not Been Done By Customs And Excise Till Nowadays. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 3(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v3i2.248

Hakim, L., Khoiry, A., & Rahayu, N. (2020). Sidang Sengketa Pajak oleh Pengadilan Pajak yang Dilaksanakan Diluar. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 6(2), 288–296.

Hidayah, K. (2018). Indonesian Tax Dispute Resolution in Cooperative Paradigm Compared to United Kingdom and Australia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012203

Laksito, H. (2022). The Effect of Tax Morale on the Compliance of State Civil Apparatus Taxpayers at Higher Education Institution With Legal Entity Pengaruh Tax Morale Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Aparatur Sipil Negara di Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 8(2), 180–200.

Mayanja, S. N., Mahazi, K., & Daniel, T. (2020). Effect of Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanism on Taxpayer’s Compliance: The Case of Rwanda. Science Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20200802.14

Medalla, E. M., & Balboa, J. (2009). ASEAN Rules of Origin: Lessons and Recommendations for Best Practice. ERIA Discussion Paper (Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia), 2009–17.

Miles, M. B., Michael, A. H., & Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Nasution, N. A., & Verico, K. (2019). Utilization of Free Trade Agreement in Indonesia: Firm-Level Data Analysis of the Yogyakarta Special Region. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 65(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.47291/efi.v65i2.665

Perdana, A. D. (2020). Analisis Hasil Putusan Banding Pengadilan Pajak (Studi Kasus Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Pajak untuk Pajak Penghasilan Badan Dengan Amar “Mengabulkan Seluruhnya” dan “Mengabulkan Sebagian” Periode 2015-2017. Universitas Indonesia.

Pratiwi, K. A. (2017). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Timbul dan Meningkatnya Sengketa Pajak di Pengadilan Pajak. Universitas Indonesia.

Purnomo, D. D. (2005). Analisis Atas Putusan Banding Pengadilan Pajak. Univesitas Indonesia.

Roem H, M. K., Su’un, M., & Ahmad, H. (2020). Influences of variable Anteseden functional Integrity Examiner on quality tax inspection. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 1(3), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.47090/povraa.v1i3.24

Rohman, I. H. K. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemenangan dan Kekalahan Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai atas Sengketa Royalti di Pengadilan Pajak. Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN.

Saptono, P. B., Khozen, I., & Ayudia, C. (2021). Main Issues of Value-Added Tax Dispute in Indonesia: A Note from 2019 Tax Court Decrees. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v5i2.5242

Schindler, P. S. (2022). Business Research Methods (14th ed.). McGraw Hill LLC.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian. Salemba Empat.

Sinambela, L. P. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Teoretik dan Praktik. Rajawali Pers.

Smith, K. W., & Stalans, L. J. (1994). Negotiating Strategies for Tax Disputes: Preferences of Taxpayers and Auditors. Law & Social Inquiry, 19(2), 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00762.x

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.

World Customs Organization. (2013). ORIGIN IRREGULARITY TYPOLOGY STUDY. World Customs Organization, July.

World Customs Organization. (2018a). Guidelines on Certification of Origin. World Customs Organization. https://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/key-issues/revenue-package/guidelines-on-certification.pdf?db=web

World Customs Organization. (2018b). GUIDELINES ON PREFERENTIAL ORIGIN VERIFICATION.

Yi, J.-S. (2016). A Study on the Dispute Settlement Procedure for the Preferential Rules of Origin. Journal of Arbitration Studies, 26(3), 3–26.

Yi, J. (2015). Rules of Origin and the Use of Free Trade Agreements: a Literature Review. World Customs Journal, 9(1).

Yulianto, I. (2022). Analisis Sengketa Pajak atas Biaya Promosi: Studi Kasus Pada Putusan Pengadilan Pajak Periode 2016-2019. Universitas Indonesia.

Zakaria, M., Ahmad, J. H., & Wan Mohamad Noor, W. N. B. (2013). Tax Evasion : A Financial Crime Rationalized ? Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), 1(2), 3–6.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/ap.v9i2.10009

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Indexing by

Index Copernicus International (ICI)

Tools:

Supported By:

JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN PERPAJAKAN

Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Universitas Merdeka Malang

Mailing Address:

Jalan Terusan Raya Dieng 62-64 Malang
East Java, Indonesia
Phone: 085855234000
Email: akuntansi.pajak@unmer.ac.id

Username
Password
Remember me