Email this article 
What Factors Affect The Fraud Detection? The Role of Red Flags and Auditor Experience
Abstract
This study intends to investigate what factors that affects fraud detection. We focus on the effect of red flags and auditor experience as the determinant factors. We also investigate the role of moderating of auditors experience on the relationship between red flags and fraud detection. We use 57 sample of auditors in the Regional Inspectorate of Central Java Province during 2022 . We employ Partial Least Square (PLS) as an analysis tool to test the hypotheses. Our findings shows that there are a positive impact od red flags and auditor experience on the fraud detection. However, auditor experience does not play a moderating role on the relationship between red flags and fraud detection. Our findings contribute to the development of fraud detection literature based on attribution theory. We provide empirical evidences on what factors affecting fraud detection.
Keywords
red flags, auditor experience, fraud detection, corporate fraud.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. (2016). Fraud detection system: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 90–113.
Andriyanti, D., & Latrini, M. Y. (2019). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, dan Profesionalisme Auditor Internal Dalam Mencegah Kecurangan Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(1), 475–504. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v27.i01.p18
Arifin, J. (2022). Determinants of the effectiveness of audit procedures in revealing fraud: An attribution theory approach. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(6), 378–387.
Bailey, A. D., Gramling, J. A. A., Bailey, A. D., Audrey, J., & Financial, A. G. (2015). Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting. i. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1574-076520150000019005
Bajra, U., & Čadež, S. (2018). Audit committees and financial reporting quality: The 8th EU Company Law Directive perspective. Economic Systems, 42(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.03.002
Dasila, R. A., & Hajering, H. (2019). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Terhadap Pendeteksian Fraud. PARADOKS: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 61–80.
Fullerton, R., & Durtschi, C. (2011). The Effect of Professional Skepticism on the Fraud Detection Skills of Internal Auditors. SSRN Electronic Journal, 435. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.617062
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Konsep, Teknik, Aplikasi Menggunakan Smart PLS 3.0 Untuk Penelitian Empiris. BP Undip.
Guelpa, A., Marini, F., du Plessis, A., Slabbert, R., & Manley, M. (2017). Verification of authenticity and fraud detection in South African honey using NIR spectroscopy. Food Control, 73, 1388–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2016.11.002
Gullkvist, B., & Jokipiii, A. (2015). Factors influencing auditors’ self-perceived ability to assess fraud risk. Nordic Journal of Business, 64(1), 40–63.
Hegazy, M., & Kassem, R. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting: Do red flags really help. Journal of Economics and Engineering, 4, 69–79.
Jaffar, N., Haron, H., Mohd Iskandar, T., & Salleh, A. (2011). Fraud Risk Assessment and Detection of Fraud: The Moderating Effect of Personality. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(7), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n7p40
Januarti, I. (2011). Analisis Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Komitmen Profesional, Orientasi Etis dan Nilai Etika Organisasi Terhadap Persepsi dan Pertimbangan Etis (Auditor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Indonesia). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIV Aceh 2011, 1–37.
Kartikarini, N., & Sugiarto. (2016). Pengaruh Gender, Keahlian, dan Skeptisisme Profesional terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX.
Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The New Fraud Triangle Model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC132216
Kurniawan, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (1st ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Larasati, D., & Puspitasari, W. (2019). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Penerapan Etika, Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 6(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v6i1.4845
Mustika, D. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud): Persepsi Pegawai Dinas Kabupaten Way Kanan Lampung. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, Lampung, 1–22.
Nair, P., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2011). Predicting unwillingness to report ethical infractions of peers: A moderated mediation approach. IIMB Management Review, 23(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2011.02.001
Okpianti, C. N. (2016). Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Etika Profesi dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor dan Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Empiris pada KAP di Yogyakarta, Solo dan Semarang).
Prasetyo, D. A., & Darmayanti, N. P. A. (2015). Pengaruh Risiko Kredit, Likuiditas, Kecukupan Modal, Dan Efisiensi Operasional Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Pt Bpd Bali. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 4(9), 2590–2617.
Pratama, N. A., Sukarmanto, E., & Purnamasari, P. (2019). Pengaruh Red Flags dan Whistleblowingsystem terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud) (Studi Empiris pada BUMN di Kota Bandung). Prosiding Akuntansi; Vol 5, No 1, Prosiding Akuntansi (Februari, 2019); 22-27.
Rumengan, I. P. E., & Rahayu, S. (2014). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi Dan Pengalaman Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Survei Terhadap Auditor Kap Di Bandung). EProceedings of Management, 1(3).
Rustiarini, N. W., Yuesti, A., & Gama, A. W. S. (2020). Public accounting profession and fraud detection responsibility. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2020-0140
Salem, M. S. (2012). An overview of research on auditor’s responsibility to detect fraud on financial statements. Journal of Global Business Management, 8(2), 218.
Sandhu, N. (2016). Behavioural red flags of fraud—A qualitative assessment. Journal of Human Values, 22(3), 221–237.
Sanjaya Adi Putra, G., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). The effect of auditor experience, type of personality and fraud auditing training on auditors ability in fraud detecting with professional skepticism as a mediation variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n2.604
Segah, B. (2018). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Independensi, Objektivitas, Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan Auditor Inspektorat Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Anterior Jurnal, 17(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v17i2.8
Setiawan, L., & Fitriany, F. (2011). Pengaruh Workload Dan Spesialisasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Kualitas Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2011.03
Tschakert, N., Needles Jr, B., & Holtzblatt, M. (2016). The red flags of fraud: Internal auditors’ knowledge of the business makes them ideal candidates to detect unethical behaviors. Internal Auditor, 73(5), 60–65.
West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016). Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Computers & Security, 57, 47–66.
Zimbelman, M. F., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, W. S. (2017). Akuntansi Forensik (4th ed.). Salemba Empat.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/ap.v9i1.9421
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing by
 |
|  |
|
Index Copernicus International (ICI)
Tools:
 |
|  |
Supported By:
|
JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN PERPAJAKAN
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Universitas Merdeka Malang
Jalan Terusan Raya Dieng 62-64 Malang
East Java, Indonesia
Phone: 085855234000
Email: [email protected]
Copyright ©2021 University of Merdeka Malang Powered by Open Journal Systems.