Legal Protection for Gestors from Dominus Who Default in the Zaakwarneming Engagement

Authors

  • Diyaul Hakki Magister of Law, Postgraduate School, University of Merdeka Malang
  • Sis Nanda Kus Andrianto Magister of Law, Postgraduate School, University of Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/iconiss.v3i1.9839

Keywords:

Agreement, Default, Zaakwarneming

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out how legal protection is for the gestor from defaulting dominus in the Zaakwarneming engagement and what legal steps can be taken by the gestor when the dominus does not want to carry out the performance voluntarily. Zaakwarneming arises when the gestor performs voluntarily and secretly an act from the dominus that is not carried out without an order. Problems arise if the dominus does not want to compensate for what was issued by the gestor, and how is the legal protection? To find answers to the problems in this study, the researchers used normative research methods using 2 (two) kinds of approaches, namely the statutory approach (Statue Approach) and the Conceptual Approach (Conceptual Approach).

Author Biographies

Diyaul Hakki, Magister of Law, Postgraduate School, University of Merdeka Malang

-

Sis Nanda Kus Andrianto, Magister of Law, Postgraduate School, University of Merdeka Malang

-

References

Aries, A. (2013). Tentang bukti perjanjian tidak tertulis. Hukumonline. Diambil dari: https://www. hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/review/lt51938378b81a3/tentang-bukti-perjanjian-tidak tertulis/

Bawono, A.C. (2012). Apa itu somasi? Hukumonline. Diambil dari: https://www. hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/review/cl483/somasi/

Harahap, Y. (1986). Aspek hukum perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni Cetakan Kedua.

Hendrawan, A.F., Suhariningsih, S.H., & Masykur, H. (2014). Perlindungan hukum bagi gestor yang telah melakukan zaakwaarneming (perwakilan sukarela) tanpa disetujui pembayaran biaya oleh dominus. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1(1), 1-20.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Satrio, J. (2012). Wanprestasi menurut hukum perdata, doktrin, dan yurisprudensi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. (2009). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Jembatan.

Sinaga, P. H. W., Wiratama, F. P. B., Indriati, F., Rahayu, D. A., & Sunarjo, S. (2022). Social control of government policy through the citizen lawsuit mechanism. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2), 123-134.

Soekanto, S., & Mamuji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif (Tinjauan singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.

Subekti. (2007). Kode sipil. Jakarta: PT. Percetakan Arga.

Volmar, H.F.A. (1989). Pengantar studi hukum perdata. Jakarta: Elang.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-26

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): November 2022

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

(1) Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.

(2) Publisher of Proceedings of International Conference in Social Science is the University of Merdeka Malang.

(3) The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.