Penerapan asas praduga tak bersalah pada harta kekayaan yang patut diduga untuk pendanaan terorisme

Prayogo Pranowo

doi:10.26905/idjch.v11i1.3539

Penerapan asas praduga tak bersalah pada harta kekayaan yang patut diduga untuk pendanaan terorisme

Prayogo Pranowo

Abstract

Money laundering is a form of further criminal acts committed to eliminate traces of wealth obtained from crime / criminal offenses, in Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Money Laundering in Article 2 paragraph 2 it is explained that an asset, if used for terrorism activities, whether it is suspected or known, it will be equated with money laundering, there is a conflict in the sentence "should be suspected" and "equated as the result of a criminal act" wherein in the presumption of innocence a person cannot be found guilty before there is a decision permanent legal force judges, normative legal research methodology with a statute approach, and conceptual approach, while the formulation of the issues to be discussed in this study are: The legal basis for the presumption of innocence in the crime of money laundering, handling of assets belonging to terrorism in Article 2 of the Law on Money Laundering and Related Regulations, and the purpose of this research are: to find out and analyze the relationship between the presumption of innocence against limiting money laundering in terms of using wealth against terrorism financing, to find out and analyzing the application of the principle of presumption of innocence to the eradication of money laundering in terms of using wealth against terrorism financing.

How to cite item: Pranowo, P. (2020). Penerapan asas praduga tak bersalah pada harta kekayaan yang patut diduga untuk pendanaan terorisme. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(1), 91-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i1.3539

Keywords

Principle of Presumption of Innocence; Wealth; Money laundering; Terrorism.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul, W., Sunardi and Muhammad Imam, S. (2004) Kejahatan Terorisme Perspektif Agama, HAM dan Hukum. Edited by A. Gunarsa. Bandung. Refika Aditama.

Amrullah, M. (2017). Pencegahan tindak pidana pencucian uang melalui jasa gatekeeper di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 6(1), 77-88. doi:10.26905/idjch.v6i1.687.

Haigner, S. D., Schneider, F. and Wakolbinger, F. (2012) Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism : A Survey. Economics of Security Working Paper 65. Berlin.

Halif (2017) ‘Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Tanpa Dakwaan Tindak Pidana Asal Kajian Putusan Nomor 57/PID.SUS/2014/PN.SLR’, Jurnal Yudisial, Vol. 10 No, p. 191.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012) Teori & Hukum Pembuktian. Edited by Y. S. Hayati. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ivan, Y., Arman, N. and Adiwarman (2010) Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Pasar Modal. Edited by A. Jamaludin. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Jr, W. F. F. (1979) ‘The “Presumption of Innocence” as Constitutional Doctrine’, 28Cath. U. L. Rev.253, p. 259.

Nurhasan (2017) ‘Keberadaan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah pada Proses Peradilan Pidana : Kajian’, Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, Vol.17 No., p. 208.

OECD (2019) Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Awareness Handbook for Tax Examiners and Tax Auditors. Paris: OECD. Available at: www.oecd.org/tax/crime/money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing-awareness-handbook-for-tax-examiners-and-taxauditors.pdf.

Sonja, C. and Zagreb (2007) ‘The Money Laundering Prevention System’, Financial Theory and Practice, 31 (1) 59-, p. 63.

Tofangaz, H. (2015) ‘Rethinking terrorist financing ; where does all this lead ?’, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18, pp. 112–130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-12-2013-0049.

Totiek, R. and Lany, R. (2015) ‘Pendekatan Anti Pencucian Uang dalam Upaya Mengoptimalkan Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme’. Surabaya, p. 10.

Wibowo, S. E. (2016) Money Laundering “ Menguak Sisi Lain Kejahatan Kerah Putih”. Narotama University Press, Surabaya.

Wiyono, R. (2014) Pembahasan Undang - Undang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i1.3539