DESIGN WAYPOINT DRONE HEXACOPTER MODEL USING SUGENO FUZZY LOGIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v3i1.3966Keywords:
Fuzzy Logic, Waypoint, Drone, GPSAbstract
Fuzzy logic is a scientific branch of Artificial Intelligence that was developed and applied to machines to be able to approach human intelligence. In order this machine or tool to be able to execute commands in a "more humane" manner, this AI uses a rule base as a reference for movement which then goes into the defuzzyication process. To apply the fuzzy logic rule base on the drone movement automatically, an error value is taken at tetta (θ) which was previously processed by the Odometery Method by taking the position value of the drone with GPS. In addition, the drone is also monitored through Android in real-time so that the user can see the position and set the goals of the drone. In order for the processor and realtime process to run optimally, the drone will use Arduino Mega as a processor, control center, and read input from each sensor related to the drone before entering FireBase (Cloud Data Base). Control of the stability of the drone system in the air is obtained by processing GPS sensors with the fuzzy logic method with an error at reading of coordinate is 0,4 meter from line distance that is given and response acceleration of fuzzy to reset the drone back to the distance of 4 m/s.References
D. Puspitaningrum, “Pengantar jaringan syaraf tiruan,†2006.
A. Maria, “Penggunaan jaringan syaraf tiruan backpropagation untuk seleksi penerimaan mahasiswa baru pada jurusan teknik komputer di Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya.†Diponegoro University, 2013.
N. Yanti and T. Nur, “APLIKASI JARINGAN SYARAF TIRUAN PADA SISTEM KONTROL ROBOT LINE FOLLOWER DENGAN ALGORITMABACKPROPAGATION,†Pros. SNITT POLTEKBA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 270–276, 2017.
A. Widiyanto and N. Nuryanto, “Rancang Bangun Mobil Remote Control Android dengan Arduino,†Creat. Inf. Technol. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50–61, 2015.
Y. Afriansyah, R. Arifuddin, and Y. Novrianto, “Rancang Bangun Alat Pendeteksi Detak Jantung, Suhu Tubuh, dan Tensimeter Berbasis Arduino Uno serta Smartphone Android,†SinarFe7, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 597–603, 2018.
P. D. P. Adi and R. Arifuddin, “Design Of Tsunami Detector Based Sort Message Service Using Arduino and SIM900A to GSM/GPRS Module,†JEEMECS (Journal Electr. Eng. Mechatron. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2018.
A. Kadir, “Panduan Praktis Mempelajari aplikasi mikrokontroler dan pemrogramannya menggunakan Arduino.†Penerbit Andi, 2013.
A. N. G. O. Son Kuswadi, M. N. Tamara, and S. Indra Adji, “Optimasi Sistem Navigasi Robot Bencana dengan Algoritma Bug dan Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan,†J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 5, no. 5, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
