Gas Pressure Measurement On Rocket Chamber Based On Strain Gauge Sensor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v3i2.4585Keywords:
Roket, MPXV7002DP, Chamber, Arduino UnoAbstract
The use of rocket technology is currently also widely used for research. The rocket itself is a flying vehicle that moves by getting a boost through the combustion reaction that occurs in the rocket. The rocket itself can launch the load to the desired destination. In the field of science and technology, continuous efforts are required to realize the development of this rocket in order to achieve independence and prosperity. In the field of science and technology, continuous efforts are required to realize the development of this rocket in order to achieve independence and prosperity. The implementation of the strain gauge sensor through the MPXV7002DP gas pressure sensor obtained the amount of gas pressure during the combustion of the propellant in the rocket chamber, where the gas pressure can be measured, processed through the Arduino Uno microcontroller. The system can measure the maximum pressure up to 380 kPa and then the system can check any changes in voltage level to prove if there is a leak in the rocket.
References
M. Oschwald et al., “Measurement of heat transfer in liquid rocket combustors,†High Pressure Flows for Propulsion Applications, vol. 260. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA Reston, VA, pp. 281–332, 2020.
F. Hötte, T. Fiedler, M. C. Haupt, P. Lungu, C. V Sethe, and O. J. Haidn, “Experimental Investigations of Thermomechanical Fluid–Structure Interaction in Rocket Combustion Chambers,†J. Propuls. Power, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 906–916, 2019.
H. Lin, F. Liu, Y. Dai, and A. Zhou, “Cascaded fiber Mach–Zehnder interferometers for Sensitivity-enhanced gas pressure measurement,†IEEE Sens. J., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2581–2586, 2018.
L. Zhang, S. Guo, H. Yu, and Y. Song, “Performance evaluation of a strain-gauge force sensor for a haptic robot-assisted catheter operating system,†Microsyst. Technol., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 5041–5050, 2017.
A. T. Nugraha and T. Agustinah, “Quadcopter path following control design using output feedback with command generator tracker based on LOS,†in 2017 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), 2017, pp. 255–260.
H. Li et al., “A Supersensitive, Multidimensional Flexible Strain Gauge Sensor Based on Ag/PDMS for Human Activities Monitoring,†Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
K. Nelson and K. Mohseni, “An artificial fish lateral line sensory system composed of modular pressure sensor blocks,†in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 4914–4919.
Downloads
Published
2020-08-30
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
