Image Extraction of Lettuce Leaves using Fast Fourier Transform Method and Color Moments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v5i2.5275Keywords:
Color Moment, Fast Fourier Transform, Lettuce Leaves, Naïve Bayes MethodAbstract
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is a seasonal leaf vegetable with high nutritional content which is usually fresh for consumption. Typical harvest age for lettuce is 45 days. Lettuce which is harvested more than 45 days will affect the taste of the lettuce. In addition to the lettuce’s age, there are several things that can affect taste of the lettuce, including room temperature, harvest time, and thickness of the leaf color. In this study, Fast Fourier transform (FFT) was used as feature extraction by changing the spatial domain in frequency domain image of the lettuce leaves, while the color moment method was used as the extraction of lettuce leaves. With this digital image processing, it can automatically identify maturity level of lettuce leaves. The classification process uses the Naïve Bayes method with the Weka application. The obtained results of texture and color extraction using FFT method and the color moment using Naïve Bayes classification method in the Weka application work well. From the results of the age classification of lettuce based on its leaf color, the average percentage of total accuracy was 94.4%. The correlation of color and taste using the correlation test which performed by SPSS, and it was found that there are positive relationship between color and taste with sig. (1-tailed) < 0.05.References
S. Edi dan J. Bobihoe, “Budidaya tanaman sayuran,†Jambi Balai Pengkaj. Teknol. Pertan. Jambi, 2010.
K. Hafidh, I. Muhimmah, dan L. Rosita, “Pemrosesan Citra Digital dalam Klasifikasi Hasil Urinalisis Menggunakan Kamera Smartphone,†J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Elektron., vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 10–15, 2019.
K. D. Septiaji dan K. Firdausy, “Deteksi Kematangan Daun Selada (Lactuca Sativa L) Berbasis Android Menggunakan Nilai RGB Citra,†J. Ilmu Tek. Elektro Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, hal. 20–27, 2018.
T. A. Setyawan, S. A. Riwinanto, A. Nursyahid, A. S. Nugroho, dan others, “Comparison of HSV and LAB Color Spaces for Hydroponic Monitoring System,†in 2018 5th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 2018, hal. 347–352.
R. Sigit, Z. Arief, dan others, “Tooth Color Detection Using PCA and KNN Classifier Algorithm Based on Color Moment,†Emit. Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 139–153, 2017.
G. F. Laxmi dan F. S. F. Kusumah, “Region of interest and color moment method for freshwater fish identification,†Telkomnika, vol. 17, no. 3, hal. 1432–1438, 2019.
A. H. T. Al-Ghrairi, Z. H. Abed, F. H. Fadhil, dan F. K. Naser, “Classification of Satellite Images Based on Color Features Using Remote Sensing,†Int. J. Comput., vol. 31, no. 3, hal. 42–52, 2018.
S. M. Singh dan K. Hemachandran, “Content-based image retrieval using color moment and Gabor texture feature,†Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues, vol. 9, no. 5, hal. 299, 2012.
T. Acharya dan A. K. Ray, Image processing: principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
F. Shidiq, “IMPLEMENTASI WATERMAKING PADA GAMBAR MENGGUNAKAN METODE FAST FOURIER TRANSFROM,†2020.
V. Nair, M. Chatterjee, N. Tavakoli, A. S. Namin, dan C. Snoeyink, “Fast Fourier Transformation for Optimizing Convolutional Neural Networks in Object Recognition,†arXiv Prepr. arXiv2010.04257, 2020.
R. Muthyalampalli, “Implementation of Fast Fourier Transform for Image Processing in DirectX 10.†September, 2009.
I. M. Sukafona dan E. F. Thalib, “CONTENT BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL DENGAN METODE COLOR MOMENT DAN K-MEANS,†J. Resist. (Rekayasa Sist. Komputer), vol. 1, no. 2, hal. 73–78, 2018.
D. Rahmawati, H. Haryanto, dan F. Sakariya, “THE DESIGN OF COCONUT MATURITY PREDICTION DEVICE WITH ACOUSTIC FREQUENCY DETECTION USING NAIVE BAYES METHOD BASED MICROCONTROLLER,†JEEMECS (Journal Electr. Eng. Mechatron. Comput. Sci., 2019.
A. Halim, S. Kusumadewi, dan L. Rosita, “PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN RESIKO KEMUNGKINAN TERJADI REAKSI DARAH,†J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Elektron., vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 58–65, 2020.
S. A. Pattekari dan A. Parveen, “Prediction system for heart disease using Na{"i}ve Bayes,†Int. J. Adv. Comput. Math. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, hal. 290–294, 2012.
J. Han dan M. Kamber, “Data Mining Concepts and Techniques (A. Stephan, Ed.), 2nd edn., vol. 40.†Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc and Elsevier Inc., San Francisco, 2006.
A. Yani dan K. Marhaendra, “Buku Panduan Praktikum Laboratorium Akuntansi SPSS,†Kediri Fak. Ekon. Progr. Stud. Akunt. Univ. Islam Kadiri, 2015.
Downloads
Published
2022-09-26
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
