Implementation Of Hot Spot Server And Bandwidth Management Using PCQ On Microtik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v5i2.6052Keywords:
Bandwidth Manajemen Bandwidth Mikrotik PCQAbstract
Lajau Kopi is a cafe located in Batu Aji, Batam, and utilizes the internet with a total bandwidth of 20 Mbps. The high access of users who use the internet, the connection becomes unstable, sometimes fast or sometimes slow and the number of users who use the downloader application results in decreased performance of the internet network, the purpose of this research is to optimize bandwidth so that the available bandwidth can be used evenly and apply the PCQ method. as one of the bandwidth management methods used. For this reason, it is necessary to build a bandwidth management method that uses a proxy routerboard with the PCQ (Per Connection Queue) method. The PCQ method is one of the methods on the proxy router that is quite reliable in bandwidth management, which is to divide bandwidth fairly and evenly. The analysis is implemented by configuring the mikrotik router and conducting direct testing assisted using speedtest.cbn.net.id and tools on winbox, namely torch. From the test results obtained in the PCQ method at Lajau Kopi, it is quite good and each computer gets bandwidth fairly and evenly. With the bandwidth owned by Lajau Kopi, which is 20 Mbps, which means 1 Mbps = 1024 Kbps * 20 = 20480 Kbps which will be divided automatically if all 4 users are using it, this bandwidth management will be carried out evenly, which is 10 Mbps for each download. users. As for uploading 1 Mbps for each user.
References
Cholid, Angga, Hakkun Elmunsyah, and Syaad Patmanthara. 2016. “Pengembangan Model Web Based Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Jaringan Dasar Paket Keahlian Tkj Pada Smkn Se-Kota Malang.†Jurnal Pendidikan - Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan 1(5):961–70. doi: 10.17977/jp.v1i5.6333.
Heryanto, Ahmad, Adi Hermansyah, and M. Nizar. 2017. “Sistem Monitoring Server Dan Perangkat Jaringan Pada Enterprise Resource Planning Fasilkom Unsri Menggunakan Protokol Icmp Dan Snmp.†Jurnal SISTEMASI 6(September):1–10.
Kurnia, Dian, Suci Ramadhani, Supriyandi, and Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Medan. 2018. “Mode Ppoe Client Mikrotik Dan Metode Pcq Di Jaringan Internet Sma Negeri 20 Medan.†3(1):28–35.
Mustofa, Tomy Alif, Edhy Sutanta, Joko Triyono, Program Studi Informatika, and Fakultas Teknologi Industri. 2019. “Jurnal JARKOM Vol . 7 No . 2 Desember 2019 PERANCANGAN DAN IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM MONITORING JARINGAN WI-FI MENGGUNAKAN MIKHMON ONLINE DI WISMA MUSLIM Jurnal JARKOM Vol . 7 No . 2 Desember 2019.†7(2):65–76.
Saibi, Rahman, Kurniabudi, and Abdul Rahim. 2014. “Analisa Dan Perancangan Jaringan Komputer Menggunakan Metode Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) (Studi Kasus: Diskominfo Provinsi Jambi).†Jurnal Ilmiah Media Processor 9(2):185–95.
Sarmidi. 2016. “Simulasi Alat Bantu Pembelajaran Topologi Jaringan Secara Visual Simulation.†Technoper 1:32–38.
Supendar, Hendra, and Martua Hami Siregar. 2018. “Metode Queue Tree Dalam Membangun Manajemen Bandwidth Berbasis Mikrotik.†Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research 2(2):29–34.
Togohodoh, Virgilius Belarmino. 2018. “Manajemen Bandwidth Dengan Metode Peer Connection Queue (PCQ) Menggunakan Queue Tree.†Skripsi Program Studi Teknik Informatika Faqultas Sains Dan Teknologi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta 81.
Downloads
Published
2022-09-26
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
