Automatic Perfume-Ingredients Mixer for Making One Type of Perfume using a Microcontroller
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v5i1.6329Keywords:
Perfume, Microcontroller, Motor stepper, LCD, KeypadAbstract
Parfume is a tool that we often use in our daily life. The fragrance of the perfume we use is also diverse to prevent user boredom. In addition, the smell of perfume is also a match for the consumer itself. The rapid development of technology lately indirectly affects the changes in the broader community. The many sophisticated inventions evidence the development of this technology.
Along with developing this technology, the equipment can be created to facilitate and provide production speed. In other words, it can increase the quality and quantity of producing goods for the users of these tools. With these technological advances, it can be used to make perfume-ingredients mixing tools to manufacture one type of perfume using a microcontroller. The test results of this tool after manual settings are obtained automatically on measuring cup 1 containing 19cc, cup 2 containing 10cc, cup 3 containing 19cc, cup 4 containing 18cc, and cup 5 containing 29cc. With an average error rate from testing the entire system of 4,8%, the system is declared to be able to work well
References
. Hariza Faisal, Wildian, Meqorry Yusfi , Rancang Bangun Magnetic Stirrer Berbasis Mikrokontroller AT89S52 Dengan Pengaturan Waktu Melalui Keypad. Jurnal Fisika Unand Vol. 2, No. 3. 2013.
, I Gede Nurhayata, Sistem Pengaturan Kecepatan Motor Universal Satu Fasa dengan Metode Kontrol Sudut Fasa Berbasis Mikrokontroller AT89S52, JPTK, UNDIKSHA, Vol. 12, No. 1,: 75-88, 2015.
. Tole Sutikno, Wahyu Sapto Aji, Rahmat Susilo, Perancangan Alat Pendeteksi Kebakaran berdasarkan Suhu dan Asap Berbasis Mikrokontroller AT89S52, TELKOMNIKA Vol. 4, No. 1,: 49 – 56. 2006.
. Andi iriawan, Totok Winarno, Hariyadi Singgih, , Sistem Kontrol Motor Pada Solar Tracking System, JURNAL ELKOLIND, VOLUME 2. NO.2. 2015.
. Firman Syafarudin. Budhi Anto, Rancang Bangun Saklar Pemindah Otomatis Berpenggerak Motor Stepper Variable Reluctance Dengan Pengendali Mikrokontroler ATMega8535, Jom FTEKNIK Volume 4 No.2 . 2017.
. Anwar Mujadin, Dwi Astharini, Uji Kinerja Modul Pelatihan Motor Penunjang Mata Kuliah Mekatronika, Jurnal AL-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI, Vol. 3, No. 3. 2016.
. Andrian Eko Widodo , Suleman Suleman, Mahmud Safudin, Pemanfaatan Arduino Untuk Mendeteksi Kelembaban Tanah, Jurnal Sains dan Manajemen Vol 7 No. 2. 2019.
. Noer Soedjarwanto, Gigih Forda Nama , Prototipe Smart door lock Menggunakan Motor Stepper Berbasis IoT (Internet of Things).. Jurnal Rekayasa dan Teknologi Elektro, Volume 15, No.2.
. Agus Santoso, Dasweptia Dj, Deni Nurdiana, Ancolo, Rancang Bangun System Pintu Otomatis Menggunakan Keypad dan RFID Berbasis Arduino Mega 2560, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, Vol. 02, No.1, Hal 05-13. 2021.
. Orji E.Z., Nduanya U.I and Oleka C.V, Microcontroller Ingredientsd Digital Door Lock Security System Using Keypad, International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), Volume VIII, Issue I, ISSN 2278-2540. 2019.
. Salma Mohammed, Abdul Hakim Alkeelani, Locker Security System Using Keypad and RFID, IEEE/ICCSRE2019, 22-24, Agadir, Morocco. 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
