An Analysis The Distinction of Generator and Efficiency Gear Ratio PLTMH Vortex Turbine in Reservoir at Bujel Village
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v6i2.8269Keywords:
PLTMH Analysis Vortex Turbin Ratio Gear Generator EfficiencyAbstract
Energy requirements are needed by modern society in this digital era. Today the most widely used energy is fossil energy. It makes fossil energy can run out at any time. Therefore, alternative energy is needed, especially energy from nature. Indonesia has a lot of potential for the development of hydroelectric power plants. It happens because Indonesia has a tropical climate with very high rainfall and many of rivers with a fairly swift flow. The study done at Bujel village in Ngimbang Sub-District, Lamongan. DC generator is superior because the DC generator used is a low rpm generator, so by low rpm can have a higher voltage level of 25V, while AC generator has a maximum voltage of 11V. Based on the standard level of water turbine efficiency of 70%-90%, it means that the second generator can be said to be efficient because the load used is only a 50 Ω. The selection of gear ratios also affects the efficiency value of a water turbine because therefore in this study will examine the difference in gear ratios, namely 46:16, 46:18, 46:20. Considering the test results of the three gears, the gear with a ratio of 46:16 has a high rpm level of 468 rpm.
References
A. Muliawan and A. Yani, “Analisis daya dan efisiensi turbin air kinetis akibat perubahan putaran runner,†Sainstek J. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017.
V. Rinanda and R. Permatasari, “Optimasi Desain Turbin Air Tipe Vortex Dengan 5 Variasi Jumlah Sudu Terhadap Efisiensi,†in PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL CENDEKIAWAN, 2018, pp. 785–790.
M. F. R. Hakim and P. H. Adiwibowo, “Uji Eksperimental Kinerja Turbin Reaksi Aliran Vortex Tipe Sudu Berpenampang Lurus dengan Variasi Tinggi Sudu,†J. Tek. Mesin, vol. 6, no. 1, 2018.
A. Al Farisi, Y. Handoyo, and T. Rokhman, “Analisis Variasi Jumlah Sudu Turbin Berpenampang Pelat Datar pada Turbin Air Aliran Vortex dengan Tipe Saluran Masuk Involute,†J. Ilm. Tek. Mesin, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 72–78, 2019.
M. Q. A. Santoso, “Analisis Perbedaan Generator Dan Effisiensi Gear Ratio PLTMH Vortex Turbine Di Waduk Desa Bujel,†J. JEETech, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2022.
T. A. Pambudi, G. E. Pramono, and D. Yuliaji, “Analisa Sistem Roda Gigi Diferensial Penggerak Roda Belakang Kendaraan Mobil Listrik (IKSA),†ALMIKANIKA, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019.
R. P. Putra, S. Samsurizal, and N. G. Pahiyanti, “Desain Sistem Kontrol Penggerak Mula Generator Magnet Permanen PLTMH Menggunakan Planetery Gear,†Kilat, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 149–159, 2018.
S. S. Murni and A. Suryanto, “Analisis Efisiensi Daya Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikrohidro Menggunakan HOMER (Studi Kasus PLTMH Parakandowo Kabupaten Pekalongan),†J. List. Instrumentasi, dan Elektron. Terap., vol. 1, no. 2, 2021.
I. P. Juliana, A. I. Weking, and L. Jasa, “Pengaruh Sudut Kemiringan Head Turbin Ulir dan Daya Putar Turbin Ulir dan Daya Output Pada Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikro Hidro,†Maj. Ilm. Teknol. Elektro, vol. 17, no. 3, 2018.
D. L. Sihaloho, “Rancang Bangun Alat Uji Model Sistem Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikro Hidro (PLTMH) Menggunakan Turbin Aliran Silang,†2017.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
