Peningkatan Quality Rate pada Batang Rokok SKT di Industri Rokok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jiv.v7i1.14329Keywords:
quality rate, DMAIC, kecacatan, batang rokok SKT regularAbstract
The research was conducted at a Kretek cigarette factory in Surabaya. Data from the Quality Assurance Department shows the quality rate for regular SKT products is 87.69%, which has yet to reach the company's target of 89%. This research follows the DMAIC stages with the help of quality tools in the form of Pareto charts and five whys analysis. From the results of the Pareto chart, it was found that the five highest types of defects with an accumulated percentage of 79% were defects in middle ambry glue, end ambry glue, flat or flat, small heads, and dirty or corroded. Root cause analysis is carried out with the help of 5 whys analysis. The root causes of defects include workers who are negligent and in a hurry, lack of tools, no work method provisions, and no check or inspection schedule. Implementation of improvements to address the root causes is carried out through improving work methods such as re-gluing methods on ambry, adjusting production targets, improving the deposit of milled products, changing the placement of basins for workers' hand wipes, and work methods related to workers' hand hygiene. In addition to improving work methods, unannounced inspections were carried out by milling assistants, regular reminders regarding work instructions, and the addition of work tools in the form of ambry racks, blend filling indicator signs and changing the color of the ambry receiving line. Implementing improvements resulted in an increase in the quality rate to 90.87%. Making work instructions, action plans, checklists, and tool specification documents is carried out to maintain the results of improvements in the production process.
Penelitian dilakukan di salah satu pabrik rokok kretek di Surabaya. Data dari Departemen Quality Assurance menunjukkan quality rate produk SKT reguler sebesar 87,69%, yang belum mencapai target perusahaan sebesar 89%. Penelitian ini mengikuti tahapan DMAIC dengan bantuan quality tools berupa pareto chart dan 5 whys analysis. Dari hasil pareto chart ditemukan 5 jenis kecacatan tertinggi dengan akumulasi persentase sebesar 79% berupa kecacatan lem ambri tengah, lem ambri ujung, kempis atau gembos, kecil kepala, dan kotor atau korep. Analisis akar penyebab dilakukan dengan bantuan 5 whys analysis. Akar penyebab dari kecacatan berupa pekerja yang lalai dan tergesa-gesa, kurangnya alat bantu, belum ada ketentuan metode kerja, dan belum ada jadwal pengecekan maupun inspeksi. Implementasi perbaikan untuk mengatasi akar penyebab dilakukan melalui perbaikan metode kerja seperti metode pengeleman ulang pada ambri, penyesuaian target produksi, pembenahan penyetoran hasil giling, perubahan penempatan baskom untuk lap tangan pekerja, dan metode kerja terkait kebersihan tangan pekerja. Selain perbaikan metode kerja dilakukan inspeksi mendadak oleh asisten giling, pengingat rutin terkait instruksi kerja, dan penambahan alat kerja berupa rak ambri, rambu indikator pengisian blend, dan penggantian warna garis terima ambri. Implementasi perbaikan menghasilkan peningkatan pada quality rate menjadi 90,87%. Pembuatan work instruction, action plan, checklist, dan dokumen spesifikasi alat dilakukan untuk mempertahankan hasil perbaikan dalam proses produksi.
Downloads
References
[1] A. Aji, L. Maulinda, and S. Amin, “Isolasi Nikotin dari Puntung Rokok sebagai Insektisida,” Jurnal Teknologi Kimia Unimal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 100–120, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ft.unimal.ac.id/teknik_kimia/jurnal
[2] World Health Organization, Tobacco or health : a global status report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997. Accessed: Jul. 31, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/41922
[3] R. D. Ratnani and R. D. Ayuningtyas, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Selongsong Penahan Isi Rokok ‘Bioventtm’ terhadap Komposisi Kimiawi Sigaret Kretek Tangan,” Inovasi Teknik Kimia, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2022.
[4] C. D. Manik, “Pengaruh kualitas produk, harga dan promosi terhadap tingkat penjualan (studi pada perumahan serpong garden),” Kreatif, Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Manajemen, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–56, 2015.
[5] R.W. Hoyer and Brooke B.Y. Hoyer, “What is quality,” Qual Prog, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 52–62, 2001.
[6] X. Zu, L. D. Fredendall, and T. J. Douglas, “The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 630–650, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.02.001.
[7] A. S. Choo, K. W. Linderman, and R. G. Schroeder, “Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 918–931, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.002.
[8] P. Andini, B. P. Y. Kurnia, U. Suryadi, H. A. Hudori, and F. E. A. Pratama, “Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Produk Rokok Kretek ‘Gagak Hitam’ dengan Menggunakan Metode SWOT dan AHP di Perusahaan Rokok Gagak Hitam Kabupaten Bondowoso,” Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95–101, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.25047/jii.v21i2.2639.
[9] D. C. Montgomery, Introduction To Statistical Quality Control, 7th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013.
[10] M. Smętkowska and B. Mrugalska, “Using Six Sigma DMAIC to Improve the Quality of the Production Process: A Case Study,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 238, pp. 590–596, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.039.
[11] A. J. Card, “The problem with 5 whys’,” BMJ Qual Saf, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 671–677, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849.
[12] W. Wahyani, A. Chobir, and D. D. Rahmanto, “Penerapan Metode Six Sigma dengan Konsep DMAIC sebagai Alat Pengendali Kualitas,” Surabaya, 2013.
[13] L. A. Pratiwi, “Statistical Quality Control in The Production Process of Sigaret Kretek Tangan at ‘XYZ’ Ponorogo Tobacco Company,” Surabaya, 2015. Accessed: Jul. 31, 2024. [Online]. Available: api.core.ac.uk/oai/oai:repository.its.ac.id:63208
[14] D. A. Moore and E. R. Tenney, “Time pressure, performance, and productivity,” Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 15, pp. 305–326, 2012, doi: 10.1108/S1534-0856(2012)0000015015.
[15] M. Sa’roni and I. Pratiwi, “Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Produk pada Perusahaan Rokok dengan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) dan Fault Tree Analysia (FTA) (Studi Kasus: PT Djarum Kudus SKT Brak Megawon II),” Surakarta, 2023. Accessed: Jul. 31, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.ums.ac.id/116205
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1)Â Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
(2) Publisher of Journal of Industrial View is Department of Industrial Engineering University of Merdeka Malang.
(3) The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.

