Commissioner board characteristics, ownership concentration, and corporate performance

Rahmat Setiawan, Irfan Handiliastawan, Rosmiati Jafar

Abstract


This study analyzes the effect of board characteristics as a corporate governance mechanism on corporate performance with ownership concentration as a moderating variable. We conduct this study because there are still rarely studies that examine the effect of board characteristics on corporate performance by adding ownership concentration as a moderating variable. This study uses a sample of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2013-2017 period with 350 observations. In this study, the characteristics of the board are proxied by the proportion of independent commissioners and the board commissioners’ size. Corporate performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). By using multiple linear regression analysis, we found that the proportion of independent commissioners and the board commissioners’ size have a significant positive effect on ROA. Other results of this study indicate that the concentration of ownership significantly weakens the positive effect of the proportion of independent commissioners and the board commissioners’ size on corporate performance.

JEL Classification: G32, G34

 

How to Cite:

Setiawan, R., Handiliastawan, I., & Jafar, R. (2020). Commissioner board characteristics, ownership concentration, and corporate performance. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(2), 131-141.

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v24i2.3827


Keywords


Board characteristics; Board size; Corporate performance; Ownership concentration; Proportion of independent commissioners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abor, J., & Biekpe, N. (2007). Corporate governance, ownership structure, and performance of SMEs in Ghana: implications for financing opportunities. Corporate Governance, 7(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710756562

Al-Saidi, M., & Al-Shammari, B. (2015). Ownership concentration, ownership composition, and the performance of the Kuwaiti listed non-financial firms. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 25(1), 108–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcoma-07-2013-0065

Altaf, N., & Shah, F. A. (2018). Ownership concentration and firm performance in Indian firms: does investor protection quality matter? Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-01-2017-0009

Amran, N. A. (2017). The effect of board of commissioners on family firm's performance in Indonesia. Advanced Science Letters, 22, 4142–4145. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8083

Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 37(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004

Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implication of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952

Detthamrong, U., Chancharat, N., & Vithessonthi, C. (2017). Corporate governance, capital structure, and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.011

Farida, D. N., & Kusumumaningtyas, M. (2017). Pengaruh dewan komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap kualitas laba. Jurnal STIE Semarang, 9(1), 50–71.

Gaur, S. S., Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics, and firm performance. Management Decision, 53(5), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2014-0519

Haryono, S. A., Fitriany, & Fatima, E. (2017). Pengaruh struktur modal dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 14(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2017.07

Kay, S., William, L., Franklin, B., Bosworth, W., & Kudo, F. (2016). Compensation committees: independence and firm performance. Managerial Finance, 42, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2015-0263

Lefort, F., & Urzúa, F. (2008). Board independence, firm performance, and ownership concentration: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Business Research, 61(6), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.036

Leung, S., Richardson, G., & Jaggi, B. (2014). Corporate board and board committee independence, firm performance, and family ownership concentration: An analysis based on Hong Kong firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2013.11.002

Li, K., Lei, L., Mittoo, U. R., & Zhou, Z. (2015). Board independence, ownership concentration, and corporate performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.05.024

Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004

Porta, R. La, Lopez-de-silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00065-9

Setiawan, D., Aryani, Y. A., & Yuniarti, S. (2019). Does ownership structure affect dividend decisions? Evidence from Indonesia’s banking industry. International Journal of Business, 24(3), 329–343.

Setiawan, R., & Agustin, R. (2018). Industrial diversification and firm performance of manufacturing: Does efficiency matter? Trikonomika, 17(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.23969/trikonomika.v17i2.1146

Setiawan, R., & Rachmansyah, A. (2019). Firm characteristics, macroeconomic variables, and cash holdings in Indonesia and Singapore. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(8), 265–286.

Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., & Batsakis, G. (2017). Corporate governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237

Stijin, C., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (1999). Expropriation of minority shareholders. Policy Research Working Paper, 1, 1–33.

Thi, M., Nguyen, T., Evans, E., & Lu, M. (2017). Independent directors, ownership concentration, and firm performance in listed companies: Evidence from Vietnam. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-07-2016-0070

Villalonga, B., Amit, R., Chung, W., Demsetz, H., Esty, B., Faccio, M., Yeung, B. (2006). How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005

Vu, M., Phan, T. T., & Le, N. T. (2018). Relationship between board ownership structure and firm financial performance in transitional economy: The case of Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.09.002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v24i2.3827

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan (Journal of Finance and Banking)

Diploma Program of Banking and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Merdeka Malang

Published by University of Merdeka Malang

Mailing Address:
2nd floor Finance and Banking Building, Jl. Terusan Raya Dieng No. 57 Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Phone: +62 813-3180-1534
Email: jkp@unmer.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0