Identification of centrality of West Kalimantan tourist attractions based on network analysis
Abstract
Tourism destinations represent a vital element and the primary motivator for tourists in determining their travel and visitation patterns. Consequently, it is essential to implement effective planning strategies that align with the diverse motivations of tourists. One of the scientific discussions in tourism planning or development is through network analysis. With network analysis, it can explain the relationship or relationship between tourist attractions so that in the future it can be further developed how the attraction cluster in a tourist destination can be developed and directed. This research sees that the priority in terms of centrality should be given to the many attractions in West Kalimantan. This study aims to identify relationships or relationships between tourist attractions in West Kalimantan to be able to see the trend of networking (centrality), can be in the form of centralization, connectedness, clusters, and others. This research uses a network analysis approach which in principle is divided into several methods such as centrality calculations carried out with analytical techniques/tools such as degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector. From the results obtained, the cluster of tourist attractions spread evenly in each region. The tourist attraction cluster with the most interaction is located in Bengkayang Regency, Pontianak City, North Kayong Regency, Ketapang Regency, and Kapuas Hulu Regency. For tourist attraction clusters with easy access, they are in the Sambas Regency and Singkawang City areas. Clusters of tourist attractions that become hubs are located in Sanggau Regency and Ketapang Regency. Then the cluster of tourist attractions with the most central point is located in Singkawang City. The road network (access) in the configuration is very influential in the connectivity between regions in reaching tourist attractions
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albrechts, L., & Mandelbaum, S. (2005). The Network Society, A New Context for Planning? Routladge.
Borgatti, S. P. (1995). Centrality and AIDS. Connections, 18(1), 112–115.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. Sage Publication.
Brás, J. M., Costa, C., & Buhalis, D. (2010). Network analysis and wine routes: The case of the Bairrada Wine Route. Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1621–1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060903580706
Chhetri, A., Arrowsmith, C., Chhetri, P., & Corcoran, J. (2013). Mapping spatial tourism and hospitality employment clusters: An application of spatial autocorrelation. Tourism Analysis, 18(5), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354213X13782245307830
Chung, M. G., Herzberger, A., Frank, K. A., & Liu, J. (2020). International Tourism Dynamics in a Globalized World: A Social Network Analysis Approach. Journal of Travel Research, 59(3), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519844834
Gajdošík, T. (2015). Network Analysis of Cooperation in Tourism Destinations. Czech Journal of Tourism, 4(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjot-2015-0002
Hanneman, R, A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. CA: University of California, Riverside. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
Hua, H., & Wondirad, A. (2021). Tourism network in urban agglomerated destinations: Implications for sustainable tourism destination development through a critical literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010285
Kementrian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif Republik. (n.d.). Statistik Pariwisata. https://kemenparekraf.go.id/
Ni, J., Qian, T., Xi, C., Rui, Y., & Wang, J. (2016). Spatial distribution characteristics of healthcare facilities in nanjing: Network point pattern analysis and correlation analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080833
Pavlovich, K. (2003). The evolution and transformation of a tourism destination network: The Waitomo Caves, New Zealand. Tourism Management, 24(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00056-0
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2011). Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Nasional 2020-2025. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/5183/pp- no-50-tahun-2011
Peng, H., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Lu, L., & Yang, L. (2016). Network analysis of tourist flows: a cross-provincial boundary perspective. Tourism Geographies, 18(5), 561–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2016.1221443
Scott, N, Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. (2008). Network Analysis and Tourism: From Theory to Practice. Channel View Publications.
Scott, Noel, Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. (2008). Network Analysis and Tourism: From Theory to Practice. Channel View Publications.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, Stanley, & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
World Ecomic Forum. (2019). Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2019. Travel and Tourism at a Tipping Point. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_2019.pdf
Zeng, B. (2018). Pattern of Chinese tourist flows in Japan: a Social Network Analysis perspective. Tourism Geographies, 20(5), 810–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1496470
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jpp.v9i1.12693
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona | ||||
Editorial Office | ||||
Address | : | Jl. Bandung No. 1 kota Malang 65113 | ||
Phone | : | +62341580303 | ||
Mobile / Whatsapp | : | Dhita Paramita A +62 857-2506-0019 (Operating Hours: Monday - Friday 08.00 - 14.00) | ||
: | [email protected] | |||
Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona has been indexed on: | ||||
Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.