Transaction Costs, Asymmetric Information, and Market Access among Small-Scale Salt Farmers in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jrei.v6i2.16640Keywords:
Asymmetric information, Institutional arrangements, Market access, Salt farmers, Transaction costsAbstract
This study examines transaction costs in the marketing of salt produced by small-scale farmers in Indonesia, focusing on the institutional arrangements that shape market access and farmer dependency. Using qualitative research design with a phenomenological approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews and document analysis involving salt farmers, intermediaries, letter owners, and related institutional actors in Pesanggrahan Village, Bangkalan Regency. The findings reveal that transaction costs arise primarily from asymmetric information, negotiation processes, and contractual constraints, particularly through the requirement to rent road permits issued by intermediaries to access salt processing firms. These costs, incurred outside production activities, limit farmers’ ability to sell directly to factories and weaken their bargaining position. As a result, farmers become structurally dependent on intermediaries within the salt supply chain. This study contributes to the transaction cost economics literature by highlighting how informal institutional arrangements and market regulations generate persistent inefficiencies and dependency among small-scale agricultural producers, with important implications for policy interventions aimed at improving farmer autonomy and market efficiency.
Downloads
References
Bangkalankab.bps.go.id. (2019). Profil Kabupaten Bangkalan. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bangkalan. https://bangkalankab.bps.go.id
Bickenbach, F., Kumkar, L., & Soltwedel, R. (1999). The new institutional economics of antitrust and regulation (Kiel Working Paper No. 961). Kiel Institute for the World Economy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.315742
Ekon.go.id. (2018). Indonesia butuh 3,7 juta ton garam industri di tahun 2018. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/1225/indonesia-butuh-37-juta-ton-garam-industri-di-tahun-2018
Fadhiela, K., Rachmina, D., & Winandi, R. (2018). Transaction costs and profit analysis of Arabica coffee farmers under the warehouse receipt system in Central Aceh. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 6(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2018.6.1.49-60
Fauziyah, & Ihsannudin. (2014). Pengembangan kelembagaan pemasaran garam rakyat (Studi kasus di Desa Lembung, Kecamatan Galis, Kabupaten Pamekasan). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Pertanian, 7(1), 52–59.
Frank, R. H. (2021). Microeconomics and behavior (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (2005). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6715
Greenwald, B. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1986). Externalities in economies with imperfect information and incomplete markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(2), 229–264.
Haaskjold, H., Andersen, B., & Lædre, O. (2020). Factors affecting transaction costs and collaboration in projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0197
Jatim.bps.go.id. (2019). Jumlah produksi garam Jawa Timur 2017–2018. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur. https://jatim.bps.go.id
Li, C.-Y., & Fang, Y.-H. (2022). The more we get together, the more we can save? A transaction cost perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102434
North, D. C. (1992). Transaction costs, institutions, and economic history. International Center for Economic Growth.
Obayi, R., & Ebrahimi, S. N. (2021). A neo-institutional view of the transaction cost drivers of construction supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(5), 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2019-0350
Oki, K. K., & Babulu, N. L. (2021). Transaction cost of black market in the Timor-Leste border region. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 13(2), 169–178.
Shahab, S. (2022). Transaction costs in planning literature: A systematic review. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211062085
Stone, A., Levy, B., & Paredes, R. D. (1992). Public institutions and private transactions: A comparative analysis of the legal and regulatory environment for business transactions in Brazil and Chile (Policy Research Working Paper No. 891). World Bank.
Sun, R.-T., Garimella, A., Han, W., Chang, H.-L., & Shaw, M. J. (2020). Transformation of the transaction cost and the agency cost in an organization and the applicability of blockchain: A case study of peer-to-peer insurance. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00024
Williamson, O. E. (1971). The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 112–123.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.
Wu, H., Qian, Q. K., Straub, A., & Visscher, H. J. (2022). Factors influencing transaction costs of prefabricated housing projects in China: Developers’ perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(1), 476–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0506
Yustika, A. E. (2008a). Ekonomi kelembagaan: Definisi, teori, dan strategi. Bayumedia Publishing.
Yustika, A. E. (2008b). The transaction cost of sugarcane farmers: An explorative study. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 23(3), 283–301. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jieb/article/view/6340
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
License
JREI: Journal of Regional Economics Indonesia, University of Merdeka Malang is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


