Kebijakan Legislatif Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan yang Melampaui Limitasi Waktu Penyidikan

Authors

  • Eduward Hutapea Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Nahdiya Sabrina Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v4i1.11134

Keywords:

Time Limitation, Investigation, Forest Destruction

Abstract

 

The background of this study is the inability of investigators to always meet the deadline for examining criminal instances of forest destruction set forth in Article 39 of Law Number 18 of 2013 for the Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction. In fact, it is still discovered that investigators cannot finish the investigation until the time limit expires, the investigation is not continued by the Public Prosecutor, and there is a condition that the Public Prosecutor cannot finish the continuation of the investigation, which is crucial to investigate. In order to determine how the legislative policy of investigating cases of forest destruction exceeds the time limit and how to regulate the investigation of cases of forest destruction in the future based on the materials existing law, this research is normative in nature. It is conducted in literature using normative qualitative analysis methods and descriptive content analysis methods.  The study's findings demonstrate that the time limit cannot be applied to all criminal investigations involving forest destruction due to a variety of factors. This, along with the fact that there is a P3H Institution that should have a uniform set of standards and the lack of technical provisions for investigators and public prosecutors, calls for a change in policy. Due to this, the study suggests that the time limit not be formulated in law but rather be regulated in technical provisions, completing technical provisions for investigations and complementing provisions for strengthening investigators due to the failure to realize the establishment of a P3H Institution.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Perdana, M. P., Galih, Y. S., & Najikha, S. (2022, September 17). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN EKOSISTEM LAUT. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 10(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v10i2.8644

Arif, J. (2020, March 31). Lembaga Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan dalam Dimensi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Disektor Kehutanan. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 5(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v5i1.146

Ningsih, D. W., & Ulfa, A. A. (2020, July 1). PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA MENURUT PASAL 170 AYAT (1) KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA. Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v9i1.1122

Harefa, E. J., Hasibuan, P., Girsang, S. B. R., & Manullang, H. (2021, July 30). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI (PT) ATAS TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. NOMMENSEN JOURNAL OF LEGAL OPINION, 2(02), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v2i02.356

Setiawan, H. W., Muhadar, M., & Mirzana, H. A. (2021, February 28). TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN FASILITAS UMUM PADA KEGIATAN UNJUK RASA. HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v5i1.5835

Fadhli, R. (2018, July 1). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol3.iss2.art3

Purba, I. H., & Siburian, S. M. (2023, February 27). KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMBAKARAN HUTAN STUDI DI KABUPATEN PELALAWAN PROVINSI RIAU. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(1), 1081. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.2902

Kafrawi, R. M. (2019, February 14). PERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 26(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v26i2.7772

Turnip, P., Suhaidi, S., Harianto, D., & Rafiqi, R. (2020, May 2). Analisis Hukum Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan Kaitannya dengan Potensi Kekosongan Hukum dalam Perspektif Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Kehutanan. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 2(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v2i1.125

Abu Bakar, A., Iskandar, M., & Reza Maulana. (2020, January 23). PENERAPAN SANKSI TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL LOGGING DI KAWASAN HUTAN LINDUNG DITINJAU DARI DARI UU N0. 18 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN PERUSAKAN HUTAN. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v3i1.37

Siregig, I. K., Anggalana, A., & Fadhilah, M. (2023, January 24). Implementasi Pertanggung Jawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan Tahura Wan Abdul Rahman (Putusan Nomor 793/PID.B/LH/2020/PN.TJK). Case Law, 4(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.25157/caselaw.v4i1.3072

Rusmana, A., & Krisnamurti, H. (2018, February 25). Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan Lindung Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v17i1.75

Hakim, S. A., Purwoleksono, D. E., & Perdana, A. S. (2020, October 1). Kewajiban Penyidikan Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan. Media Iuris, 3(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v3i3.22493

Handitya, B., & Rufaida, K. K. (2020, July 31). REVITALISASI KETENTUAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN PERUSAKAN HUTAN. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.272-279

Naluri, A., Hatta, M., & Johari, J. (2023, August 23). KEDUDUKAN PIDANA DENDA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN HUTAN DI KAWASAN HUTAN ACEH UTARA. JURNAL ILMIAH MAHASISWA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS MALIKUSSALEH, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v6i2.10237

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Hutapea, E., & Sabrina, N. (2023). Kebijakan Legislatif Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan yang Melampaui Limitasi Waktu Penyidikan. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 4(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v4i1.11134

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): May 2023 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is applied when mandated by research funders, such as those who have signed. Open Access articles in MLJ Merdeka Law Journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.