Email this article 
Peran dan Kendala yang dihadapi Jaksa dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Pidana Bersyarat
Abstract
One form of alternative punishment that is quite often used in developing criminal offenders is conditional punishment. Conditional sentences are decided by a court judge with conditions, namely that their implementation is supervised by an authorized officer, intended to improve the convict so that he is not influenced by prison subculture, conditional sentences are also intended to prevent the occurrence of crime. Based on the background of the problem above, this article aims to examine and analyze the role of prosecutors in supervising the implementation of criminal decisions and the obstacles faced by prosecutors in supervising the implementation of conditional criminal decisions at the Sampang District Prosecutor's Office. This research uses legal science research with empirical aspects or non-doctrinal legal research or socio-legal research with a descriptive qualitative research approach. The results of this research are the implementation of supervision of conditional criminal decisions carried out by prosecutors at the Sampang District Prosecutor's Office only by requiring convicts to report within a certain period of time (during the probation period), in addition to coordinating with the police, BAPAS and with the heads of the villages where they are located. the conditional convict's domicile for monitoring by sending a copy of the conditional sentence notification report letter (P-51). The obstacles faced by prosecutors at the Sampang District Prosecutor's Office in implementing supervision of conditional criminal decisions are; legal factors, law enforcement factors, facility factors and community legal culture factors.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin, M. Z. (2015). Pidana Bersyarat Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Fikih. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2015.1.2.342-382
Arifin, S., & Ihsan, A. Y. (2023). Quo Vadis Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Formil. SPEKTRUM HUKUM, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.56444/sh.v20i1.3866
Atika, N. (2023). Kewenangan Jaksa dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v2i7.5291
Bahiej, A. (2012). Arah dan Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v1i2.1920
Herlin Hastuti. (2023). Implementasi Penerapan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v1i2.273
Imam Rahmaddani. (2023). Pengawasan Kode Etik Jaksa oleh Komisi Kejaksaan Guna Terwujudnya Jaksa yang Profesional dan Berintegritas. Journal Presumption of Law, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31949/jpl.v5i1.4403
Iswara, D. A. (2020). Optimalisasi Pengawasan Komisi Kejaksaan dalam Mengawasi Pelanggaran Kode Etik Kasus Korupsi pada Jaksa. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i4.204
Jainah, Z. O., Anggalana, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2022). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Percobaan atau Permufakatan Jahat Untuk Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi putusan nomor. 17/pid.sus/2019/Gns). Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.57084/jpj.v3i1.560
Jumadi, J., & Indrajaya, I. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Hukuman Pidana Bersyarat terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Wajah Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1096
Kajian Kes Aplikasi Rasional Emotif Tingkah Laku (REBT) dalam Menangani Isu Tekanan. (2022). Jurnal Dunia Pengurusan. https://doi.org/10.55057/jdpg.2022.4.1.2
N. Singadimedja, H. (2017). Restitusi terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas sebagai Syarat Pidana Bersyarat. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i2.847
Nugraha, A. (2017). Penjatuhan Pidana Bersyarat Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. Fiat Justisia:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no1.743
PH, A. (2017). Pidana Pengawasan sebagai Pengganti Pidana Bersyarat dalam Pembaruan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Militer. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v5i3.1431
Ronaldi, A. (2023). Reformasi Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v4i1.41
W., & Utami, W. (2022). Perbandingan dan Justifikasi Pidana Bersyarat dalam KUHP dan Pidana Pengawasan dalam RUU-KUHP Sebagai Alternatif Pengganti Pidana Penjara. MAKSIGAMA, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.37303/maksigama.v16i2.132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v4i2.11531
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Postgraduate - University of Merdeka Malang Postgraduate Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64 | Other Link | Follow Us | |||||
|
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal |
