Email this article 
Penerapan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia
Abstract
This study aims to examine the criteria for transferring fiduciary security objects into a criminal offense and the application of law in the case of criminal acts of transferring fiduciary security objects. This study is a nomrative legal research because it examines and analyzes the criteria for transferring fiduciary security objects according to the provisions of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The results show that there are two criteria where the act of transferring the object of fiduciary guarantee becomes a criminal offense, namely: a) The act of transferring the object of fiduciary guarantee which is carried out without the written consent of the Fiduciary Recipient. b) The act of transferring the object of fiduciary guarantee which is carried out when the fiduciary encumbrance process is not carried out jointly between the creditor and the debtor, but only based on the standard clause, namely the granting of power from the debtor to the creditor in accordance with Article 18 paragraph (1) letter h of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v3i2.9219
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alauddin, A., & Prasetyo, Y. (2017). Rekstrurisasi Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Kendaraan Motor Ropda Dua Di MAsa Pandemi Covid 19 Di PT. Adira Cabang Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Jendela Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(0736), 17–33.
Andyanto, H. (2019). Perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur yang menggunakan jaminan fidusia. Jurnal Jendela Hukum Fakultas Hukum Unija, 6(1).
Anggun, W. P., Bakri, M., & Fadli, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Fidusia Atas Jamninan Berupa Piutang Berdasarkan Surat Daftar Piurtang yang Dibuat Oleh Pemberi Fidusia (Studi terhadap Pasal 9 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia). 42.
Hasyim, A. D. (2016). Overview of Islamic Law on “ Leasing ” Implementation in The Indonesian Civil Code Introduction Among the Islamic principal teachings is that the position of human in this world is regarded as the caliph of God ( al-Baqarah : 30 ) who spreads His message. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 50(1).
Puspitasari, I., & Rois, I. (2018). Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Meta Yuridis, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v1i2.2343
Saenanda, S., & Arpangi, A. (2020). Jurudical review of The Implementation of Car Rental Agreement in PT. Andalan DFinance Semarang. KONFERENSI ILMIAH MAHASISWA UNISSULA (KIMU) 3.
Subagiyo, D. T. (2018a). Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar) (Issue 2002112188).
Subagiyo, D. T. (2018b). Legal Standing Debitor Selama Menguasai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Photosynthetica, 2(1), 1–13.
Supriyanto, I. (2022). Penggunaan debt collector dalam eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia dan eksekusi jaminan fidusia tidak terdaftar ditinjau dari Undang-Undang nomor 42 tahun 1992 tentang jaminan fidusia. Essie Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(1), 12–18.
Suradi, S., & Utama, B. R. (2022). Law, Development & Justice Review Aspek Hukum Penerapan Perjanjian Baku Terhadap Perjanjian Sewa Beli Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata. Law, Development & Justice Review, 5(1), 44–64.
Winarno, J. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Independent, 1(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v1i1.5
Winata, O. J. R., Yunanto, Y., & Prasetyo, M. H. (2021). Gaji Sebagai Objek Jaminan Utang di Bank Menurut Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. Notarius, 14(2), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43789
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v3i2.9219
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Postgraduate - University of Merdeka Malang Postgraduate Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64 | Other Link | Follow Us | |||||
|
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal |
