Theory of planned behavior and whistleblowing intention

Tarjo Tarjo, Anang Suwito, Ifa Diah Aprillia, Greska Redielano Ramadan

Abstract


This research examined the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as predictor whistleblowing intention. According to TPB, it is difficult to posit whistleblowing as actual behavior. Whistleblowing is more suited to be posited as intention. Intent means the likelihood of actual behavior occurred. We examined attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control as TPB variables. We also investigated a few control variables such as colleagues support, organizational support, and fear of retaliation. The online survey was conducted in obtaining data by a web-based questionnaire. Participants of this survey were employees of regional owned east java bank. The number of respondents was 112 employees from all departments and units. Validity, reliability, regression, and path analysis were used in testing research instrument and several hypotheses. The result showed that attitudes and subjective norms as TPB variables have a significant impact on whistleblowing intention. However, perceived behavioral control does not affect whistleblowing intention. While, among several control variables, only fear of retaliation that has a significant effect on whistleblowing intention. Furthermore, this study also found empirical evidence that knowledge and subjective norms have an indirect effect on whistleblowing intention through attitudes. This research suggests that regional owned east java bank should provide an environment and channels to support whistleblowing within effectively, especially through protection and/or reward systems, or etc.

JEL Classification: D23, G34, L23

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i1.2714


Keywords


Attitudes; Behavioral Control; Subjective Norms; Whistleblowing Intention

References


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Albrecht, S. L., & Carpenter, K. E. (2010). Attitudes as predictors of behavior versus behavior intentions: A convergence of research traditions. Sociometry, 39(1), 1–10.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2018). Report To The Nations 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

Awang, Y., & Ismail, Z. (2018). Determinants of financial reporting fraud intention among accounting practitioners in the banking sector: Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(1), 32–54.

Bobek, D. D., Roberts, R. W., & Sweeney, J. T. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9219-x

Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669

Cassematis, P. G., & Wortley, R. (2013). Prediction of whistleblowing or non-reporting observation: The Role of personal and situational factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1548-3

Chang, Y., Wilding, M., & Shin, M. C. (2017). Determinants of whistleblowing intention: Evidence from the South Korean Government. Public Performance and Management Review, 40(4), 676–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1318761

Cho, Y. J., & Song, H. J. (2015). Determinants of whistleblowing within government agencies. Public Personnel Management, 44(4), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026015603206

Christophersen, T., & Konradt, U. (2011). Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of a single-item measure of online store usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.005

Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015

Erikson, K., & Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation; A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=39712230&Fmt=7&clientId=25620&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Feldman, Y., & Lobel, O. (2007). Behavioral versus institutional antecedents of decentralized enforcement in organizations: An experimental approach. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 165-192. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1031853

Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.8925239

Hwang, D., Staley, B., Chen, Y. Te, & Lan, J. S. (2008). Confucian culture and whistle-blowing by professional accountants: An exploratory study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(5), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810875316

Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996). Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence. New Directions for Evaluation, 70, 29–44.

Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, A. B. L. de S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8

Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2014). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951

Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73

Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9.

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1

Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1988). Individual and situational correlates of whistleblowing. Personnel Psychology, 41(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02385.x

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382668

Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2009). Whistleblowing as planned behavior-A survey of South Korean police officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9788-y

Pillay, S., Ramphul, N., Dorasamy, N., & Meyer, D. (2015). Predictors of whistle-blowing intentions: An analysis of multi-level variables. Administration and Society, 50(2), 186-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581621

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

Richardson, B. K., Wang, Z., & Hall, C. A. (2012). Blowing the whistle against Greek hazing: The theory of reasoned action as a framework for reporting intentions. Communication Studies, 63(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.624396

Ryan, M. J. (1982). Behavioral Intention formation: The Interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 263. https://doi.org/10.1086/208922

Trongmateerut, P., & Sweeney, J. T. (2013). The influence of subjective norms on whistle-blowing: A cross-cultural investigation. J Bus Ethics, 112(3) 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1270-1

Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





WhatsApp Image 2019-06-12 at 16.37.31WhatsApp Image 2019-06-12 at 15.50.42

Journal of Finance and Banking

Diploma Program of Banking and Finance
Faculty of Economics and Business University of Merdeka Malang

Mailing Address:

2nd-floor Banking and  Finance Building, Terusan Raya Dieng Street No.57 Malang, 65146, East Java, Indonesia
Phone/WhatsApp: +628123321664; Fax. +62 341 580511
Email: jkpunmermlg@yahoo.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.