Email this article 
Prinsip Non-Kooperasi Soekarno sebagai Komunikasi untuk Melawan Kolonialisme
Abstract
Colonialism is closely related to monological, stereotypical, and hegemonic communication patterns. This implies a superior and inferior dichotomy between colonizer and colonized. The colonized nation which was labeled inferior in the end tended to imitate (mimicry) the colonizer, who claimed to be superior. One of the efforts made by Soekarno to counter this was by using the principle of non-cooperation. As a principle, non-cooperation is used to generate the nation's independence, self-confidence and national identity. This study uses hermeneutic analysis to explore a more comprehensive meaning of the non-cooperation principle. The main focus of this research is to find out the authentic values which are the result of applying the principle of non-cooperation. The results of this study indicate that non-cooperation does not only revolve around reluctance to cooperate, mass action, and revolution. Soekarno used the principle of non-cooperation as a form of communication to construct alternative narratives that could be used against colonialism. In the end, non-cooperation also grows the seeds of the formulation of a national personality that can be used as a guideline for shaping national identity.
Keywords: Colonialisme, Soekarno, Non-Cooperation, Hegemony, National Idenity
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v7i1.5336
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, C. (1965). Sukarno; an Authobiography as Told to Cindy Adams. Toppan Printing.
Aminuddin, Katimin, & Syukri. (2019). Sukarno ’s Thought about Marhaenism. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 2(2), 420–426.
Bhabha, H. (1990). Nation and Narration. Routledge.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture (H. Bhabha (Ed.)). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Bhabha, H. (1995, February). Black Male. Artforum, 86–87, 110.
Dewi, M. (2015). Dari Gemeenteraad Sampai Volksraad. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Palmer, R. (1969). Hermeneutics Richard E. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory; A Critical Introduction. Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n435
Gardner, A., Mark, L., & Ulrike, S. (Eds.). (2015). Post-colonial Theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.001.0001
Hafiz, A., Zidni, & Hadi, M. S. (2020). Sejarah Pandangan Tan Malaka dengan Soekarno dalam Perspektf Kemerdekaan Indonesia 1949-1940. Historia, 4(1), 24–33.
Hartanto, H. (2005). Sejarah Pertentangan Soekarno-Hatta dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kebijakan Politik Indonesia. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Huddart, D. (2006). Homi K. Bhabha. In . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05386-2_3
Jensen, K. B. (2018). The Double Hermeneutics of Communication Research. Javnost - The Public, 25(1–2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418968
Karisma, N. A., Swastika, K., & Sumardi. (2018). The Ideas Differences Between Soekarno and Hatta ’ s Regarding The National Movement Strategy In 1927-1936. Jurnal Historica, 2(2252–4673), 153–167. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JHIS/article/view/8889/5986
Latif, Y. (2011). Negara Paripurna. Gramedia.
Latif, Y. (2018). Identitas Keindonesiaan dan Aktualisasi Pancasila bagi Generasi Milenial di Era Digital. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 33, 5–19.
Mahfud, M. D. (2020, January 1). Tidak Ada Islamofobia di Indonesia. Kompas, 6.
Mueller-Vollmer, K. (Ed.). (1987). The Hermeneutics Reader (Vol. 38, Issue 3). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.2307/590701
Roy, A., & Oludaja, B. (2009). Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Praxis : Implications for Connection and Action in Communication Studies . Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01038.x
Said, E. (2010). Orientalisme; Menggugat Hegemoni Barat dan Mendudukkan Timur sebagai SUbjek. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sherry, S., & St-Pierre, P. (Eds.). (2000). Changing The Terms; Translating in the Postcolonial Era. University of Ottawa Press.
Soekarno. (n.d.). Indonesia Menggugat. Departemen Penerangan RI.
Soekarno. (1964a). Di Bawah Bendera Revolusi. Departemen Penerangan RI.
Soekarno. (1964b). Tjamkan Pantjasila. Departemen Penerangan RI.
Weinstein, F. B. (2007). Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Dependence from Sukarno and to Soeharto. Equinox.
Wierciński, A. (2005). Between Description and Interpretation: The Hermeneutic Turn in Phenomenology (A. Wierciński (Ed.)). https://books.google.com/books?id=JeNDHAAACAAJ&pgis=1
Winartono, W., Antoni, A., & Sujoko, A. (2019). Membumikan Ilmu Komunikasi di Indonesia (Pembacaan Hermeneutik Gadamerian atas Tulisan-Tulisan M. Alwi Dahlan). Mediakom, 2(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.32528/mdk.v2i2.1922
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v7i1.5336
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office
Jurnal Nomosleca
Faculty of Social and Political Science University of Merdeka Malang
© 2020 {Jurnal Nomosleca}, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Licensed under |
