Self-Efficacy and Attitude Mediation in the UMEGA Model: Behavior of e-Samsat Users in Bali

Authors

  • Ni Luh Feby Millennia Yustina Brawijaya University
  • Roekhudin Roekhudin Faculty of Economics and Business, Brawijaya University Indonesia
  • Rusydi Mohamad Khoiru Faculty of Economics and Business, Brawijaya University Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v7i3.13550

Keywords:

Behaviour Intention, e-Government, UMEGA

Abstract

The aim of this research is to provide empirical evidence regarding the influence of variables in the UMEGA Theory model on taxpayers' behavior intention in adopting the e-Samsat system and to test the role of attitude variables as mediating variables in the UMEGA model. This research also adds self-efficacy as a predictor of behaviour intention to expand the UMEGA model. Sampling in this study used a non-probability sampling technique using purposive sampling. The sample in this study was 411 respondents who were motor vehicle taxpayers in Bali Province. This research uses quantitative method with primary data through distributing questionnaires. Data processing uses Partial Least Square analysis. The research results show that the variables performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and perceived risk influence attitudes. Attitude and self-efficacy variables were also found to influence the behaviour intention of motor vehicle taxpayers. Attitude was found to mediate the relationship between the influence of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and perceived risk on behaviour intention. Meanwhile, the facilitating condition variable was not found to be a predictor of taxpayers' behaviour intention in using e-Samsat.

JEL Classification: M2, O3

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v7i3.13550.

References

Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Althunibat, A., & Khawatreh, S. (2020). Mobile Govern-ment Adoption Model Based on Combining GAM and UTAUT to Explain Factors Accord-ing to Adoption of Mobile Government Ser-vices. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(3), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i03.11264

Al-Saedi, K., Al-Emran, M., Ramayah, T., & Abusham, E. (2020). Developing a general ex-tended UTAUT model for M-payment adop-tion. Technology in Society, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293

Arshad, I., Zahid, H., Ahmad, M. A., Hashmi, A., & Abro, A. (2021). Antecedents of Intention to Use E-Government Services Among the Employees of Public Universities: Validation of Umega Model. International Journal of Man-agement (IJM), 12(3), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.12.3.2021.086

Avazov, S., & Lee, S. (2020). E-Government Adop-tion in Uzbekistan: Empirical validation of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Acceptance (UMEGA). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 338–339. https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3397008

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Re-view, 84(2), 191.

Burhanudddin, Badruddin, S., & Yapid, B. M. (2019). Determinants of citizen’s intention to use online e-government services: A valida-tion of umega model. Polish Journal of Man-agement Studies, 20(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.1.10

Carter, L., Christian Shaupp, L., Hobbs, J., & Campbell, R. (2011). The role of security and trust in the adoption of online tax filing. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(4), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161111173568

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An inte-grated model. MIS Quarterly, 51–90.

Ginta, Y. V. S. (2022). 449.249 Unit Kendaraan Menunggak Pajak, Pemprov Bali Berlakukan Relaksasi. . Https://Denpasar.Kompas.Com/Read/2022/04/04/192300078/449249-Unit-Kendaraan-Menunggak-Pajak-Pemprov-Bali-Berlakukan-Relaksasi.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Pub-lishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2007). Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an ac-tor-network perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 165–177.

Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001

Lallmahomed, M. Z. I., Lallmahomed, N., & Lallmahomed, G. M. (2017). Factors influenc-ing the adoption of e-Government services in Mauritius. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 57–72.

Mensah, I. K., & Mi, J. (2019). Computer self-efficacy and e-government service adoption: the moderating role of age as a demographic factor. International Journal of Public Admin-istration, 42(2), 158–167.

Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., & Luo, C. (2020). E-Government Services Adoption: An Exten-sion of the Unified Model of Electronic Gov-ernment Adoption. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020933593

Nugroho, R. A., Imania, A. N., & Rahmawati, A. A. (2022). Public Acceptance of Mobile Civic Service in Indonesia Using a Unified Model of E-Government Acceptance. KnE Social Sci-ences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i5.10551

Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Citizen’s adoption of an e-government system: Vali-dating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172–181.

Saragih, A. H., & Septamia, N. U. (2019). ANA-LISIS PENERIMAAN PENGGUNA E-FILING MENGGUNAKAN MODEL UNI-FIED THEORY ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY (UTAUT). Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 3(1), 1–17. http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/jka

Schaupp, L. C., & Carter, L. (2010). The impact of trust, risk and optimism bias on E-file adop-tion. Information Systems Frontiers, 12, 299–309.

Sholihin, M., & D, R. (2013). Analisis SEM-PLS Dengan Warppls 3.0. . CV. Andi Offset.

Slade, E., Williams, M., Dwivedi, Y., & Piercy, N. (2015). Exploring consumer adoption of prox-imity mobile payments. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(3), 209–223.

Upadhyay, N., Kamble, A., & Navare, A. (2023). Virtual healthcare in the new normal: Indian healthcare consumers adoption of electronic government telemedicine service. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101800

Venkatesh, V., Smith, R. H., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., & Walton, S. M. (2003). USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW 1. User Acceptance of IT MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Verkijika, S. F., & De Wet, L. (2018). E-government adoption in sub-Saharan Africa. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.05.012

Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papas-ratorn, B. (2008). Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use e Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self Efficacy. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 6(1), pp55-64.

Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Mar-kets, 12(3), 157–162.

Zarei, N., Nazari, F., & FarhadPoor, M. R. (2019). Internet Self-Efficacy and the Use of Elec-tronic Information Services Ac-ceptanceamong University Students. Interna-tional Journal of Information Science and Man-agement, 17(2), 55–70. www.SID.ir

Zubaidah, E., Nurmandi, A., Pribadi, U., & Hid-yati, M. (2021). Taxpayer Behavior in Using E-Vehicle in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of In-formation Systems, 31(3), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.14329/APJIS.2021.31.3.378

Downloads

Published

2024-11-20

How to Cite

Yustina, N. L. F. M., Roekhudin, R., & Mohamad Khoiru , R. (2024). Self-Efficacy and Attitude Mediation in the UMEGA Model: Behavior of e-Samsat Users in Bali. AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review), 7(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v7i3.13550