External commodity uncertainty and accounting conservatism: Evidence from Indonesian Mining Firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v9i2.17169Keywords:
Accounting conservatism, Commodity price volatility, Environmental scrutiny, Mining firms, Political-cost exposureAbstract
Commodity-market instability changes several aspects in extractive firms: future cash flows, asset recoverability, impairment risk, and the credibility demands. This study examines whether commodity price volatility is associated with accounting conservatism and whether that association increase significantly under political-cost exposure and environmental scrutiny. The analysis includes 198 firm-year observations from Indonesian mining firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2014–2024. Accounting conservatism is measured through negative accruals scaled by total assets, while commodity price volatility is calculated as the annual standard deviation of monthly log returns for the benchmark commodity matched to each firm’s dominant activity. Two-way fixed-effects regressions with heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors show that commodity price volatility, political-cost exposure, and environmental scrutiny are positively associated with conservatism. Both interaction terms are also positive and significant. Economically, a one-standard-deviation increase in volatility corresponds to a 0.0066 increase in CONACC, approximately 13.5 percent of its sample mean. The marginal effect of volatility is larger at higher levels of political-cost exposure and environmental scrutiny. The findings support a conditional reporting-response explanation: external uncertainty, particularly in commodity, is associated with greater prudence, particularly when firms face stronger political visibility and environmental accountability. The study extends positive accounting, stakeholder, and legitimacy perspectives to an emerging-market extractive industry setting while recognizing that the observational design does not establish experimental causality.
Downloads
References
Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings1. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
Blesia, J. U., Setya, G., & Muslimin, U. R. (2023). Accounting conservatism: Testing the effects of investment opportunity set and political cost. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 13(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v13i2.3480
Centorrino, G., Naciti, V., & Rupo, D. (2025). Extending the boundaries of financial reporting in the extractive industries: Insights from bibliometric analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2967
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, organizations and society, 33(4-5), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861
Ferdous, L. T., Atawnah, N., Yeboah, R., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Firm-level climate risk and accounting conservatism: International evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103511
Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?. Journal of accounting and economics, 29(3), 287-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00024-0
Haque, M. A., Topal, E., & Lilford, E. (2014). A numerical study for a mining project using real options valuation under commodity price uncertainty. Resources Policy, 39, 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.12.004
Haque, M. A., Topal, E., & Lilford, E. (2017). Evaluation of a mining project under the joint effect of commodity price and exchange rate uncertainties using real options valuation. The Engineering Economist, 62(3), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1217366
Harakeh, M., Lee, E., & Walker, M. (2024). Understanding how the effects of conditional conservatism measurement bias vary with the research context. European Accounting Review, 33(1), 191-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2074864
Khalifa, M., Zouaoui, H., Ben Othman, H., & Hussainey, K. (2024). The impact of climate risk on accounting conservatism: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(3), 570-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2023-0028
Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 447-478. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
Roberts, M. R., & Whited, T. M. (2013). Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance, 2, 493–572. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-453594-8.00007-0
Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207
Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.287
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-4500569
Yantiana, N., Ricky, R., & Heniwati, E. (2021). Valuing PSAK 64 in reducing conservatism in the extractive industry. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 11(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v11i2.2549
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
