Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Generator Power Systems, Power Distribution, Electric Power Conversion, Protection Systems and Technology Electrical

Signal Materials , Systems, and Electronics
Digital Signal Processing, Image Processing, Robot Systems, Control Systems and Embeded

Systems Communication Systems
Telecommunications, Wireless Communications and Computer Networks

Information Technology
Engineering Software, Data Mining

Multimedia, Mobile Computing, Parallel / Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Graphics and AR / VR

Application of
Instrumentation Science , Mathematics, Physics, Geological Technology, Chemistry, Science Education and Health Technology

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.

The research article submitted to this journal will be double blind review at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.

Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.

 

Publication Frequency

JASIEK will be published twice a year, Juni and December

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Screening for Plagiarism

In that publication, JASIEK strongly opposes plagiarism on the basis of its own material. JASIEK is committed to blocking plagiarism, including self plagiarism.

The author must ensure that they have written the original work fully, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others who have been quoted or quoted correctly. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and the author is strongly recommended. Also, important parts of the work have not been published. The author also appreciates writing in JASIEK publications , duplicates, or fraud.

Before the author sends the manuscript to JASIEK at least to first check the use of plagiarism. When submitting articles published for authenticity checks, JASIEK recommends using Turnitin, a Scanner from http://turnitin.com/. Before using Turnitin Plagiarism for the first time, we strongly recommend that the writer read the instructions for using this plagiarism detector. Plagiarism detector system for JASIEK use and affiliated with Turnitin.

* Please note that JASIEK is affiliated with Turnitin.

The article has not been published in other media and does not contain plagiarism. Preferably the author must use reference management software, for example for Mendeley. Bibliography and reference system for JASIEK using Mendeley.

 

Review Guidelines

General

- Put a mark on the wrong part or the part that needs to be changed
- Put a mark on the right side of the wrong line or line that needs to be changed Title


Details

: Effectiveness, Specifications, and clarity
Abstract: Complete and explain the essence of the article
Keywords: Describe the essential concepts of Article
Introduction: Current, originality, relevance of the topic, compatibility of important reasons for research objects Research
Methods: Must emphasize procedures and data analysis for empirical studies
Results: Analysis of accuracy
Findings: Recent findings, relevance with interrelated researchers, and effects of scientific contributions from findings / ideas for the development of science
Conclusion: Logical, valid, concise, and clear
inputs: practical action, the development of new theories and subsequent research / advanced
Image / Table: The location is central, not truncated, Nice quality to be seen, Title image / table, Called Capitalized
List Library: Current levels and references to the main book sources. Rules: at least 80% of journals or scientific researchers are interrelated, above 2007 (year); minimum number of book sources is 10; a minimum of 80% in text / art material.


The Complete Manuscript

Writing Process : Is the script easy to follow, that is, has clear logical and organizational development?
Is the script concise and understandable? Any parts that must be reduced,
Eliminated / expanded / added?
Pay attention if there are major problems with mechanics: grammar, punctuation, spelling. (If there are only a few places that don't have a good or right word, make a note to tell the author of a specific place. If there are consistent problems throughout, only select one or two examples if necessary - don't try and edit them all).
Abbreviations: Used wisely and arranged so that the reader will have no trouble remembering what the abbreviations represent.
Follow the style, format and other rules of the journal.
Quotations are given when providing evidence-based information from outside sources. Published


Decision Categories

: No
Minor Revisions Required : Revisions can be made by the Editor in Chief or those who help
Major: Revisions can only be made by authors
Rejected: Not scientific or too much

 

Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.