Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Generator Power Systems, Power Distribution, Electric Power Conversion, Protection Systems and Technology Electrical

Signal Materials , Systems, and Electronics
Digital Signal Processing, Image Processing, Robot Systems, Control Systems and Embeded

Systems Communication Systems
Telecommunications, Wireless Communications and Computer Networks

Information Technology
Engineering Software, Data Mining

Multimedia, Mobile Computing, Parallel / Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Graphics and AR / VR

Application of
Instrumentation Science , Mathematics, Physics, Geological Technology, Chemistry, Science Education and Health Technology

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.

The research article submitted to this journal will be double blind review at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.

Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.

 

Publication Frequency

JASIEK will be published twice a year, April and October

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Screening for Plagiarism

In that publication, JASIEK strongly opposes plagiarism on the basis of its own material. JASIEK is committed to blocking plagiarism, including self plagiarism.

The author must ensure that they have written the original work fully, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others who have been quoted or quoted correctly. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and the author is strongly recommended. Also, important parts of the work have not been published. The author also appreciates writing in JASIEK publications , duplicates, or fraud.

Before the author sends the manuscript to JASIEK at least to first check the use of plagiarism. When submitting articles published for authenticity checks, JASIEK recommends using Turnitin, a Scanner from http://turnitin.com/. Before using Turnitin Plagiarism for the first time, we strongly recommend that the writer read the instructions for using this plagiarism detector. Plagiarism detector system for JASIEK use and affiliated with Turnitin.

* Please note that JASIEK is affiliated with Turnitin.

The article has not been published in other media and does not contain plagiarism. Preferably the author must use reference management software, for example for Mendeley. Bibliography and reference system for JASIEK using Mendeley.

 

Review Guidelines

General

- Put a mark on the wrong part or the part that needs to be changed
- Put a mark on the right side of the wrong line or line that needs to be changed Title


Details

: Effectiveness, Specifications, and clarity
Abstract: Complete and explain the essence of the article
Keywords: Describe the essential concepts of Article
Introduction: Current, originality, relevance of the topic, compatibility of important reasons for research objects Research
Methods: Must emphasize procedures and data analysis for empirical studies
Results: Analysis of accuracy
Findings: Recent findings, relevance with interrelated researchers, and effects of scientific contributions from findings / ideas for the development of science
Conclusion: Logical, valid, concise, and clear
inputs: practical action, the development of new theories and subsequent research / advanced
Image / Table: The location is central, not truncated, Nice quality to be seen, Title image / table, Called Capitalized
List Library: Current levels and references to the main book sources. Rules: at least 80% of journals or scientific researchers are interrelated, above 2007 (year); minimum number of book sources is 10; a minimum of 80% in text / art material.


The Complete Manuscript

Writing Process : Is the script easy to follow, that is, has clear logical and organizational development?
Is the script concise and understandable? Any parts that must be reduced,
Eliminated / expanded / added?
Pay attention if there are major problems with mechanics: grammar, punctuation, spelling. (If there are only a few places that don't have a good or right word, make a note to tell the author of a specific place. If there are consistent problems throughout, only select one or two examples if necessary - don't try and edit them all).
Abbreviations: Used wisely and arranged so that the reader will have no trouble remembering what the abbreviations represent.
Follow the style, format and other rules of the journal.
Quotations are given when providing evidence-based information from outside sources. Published


Decision Categories

: No
Minor Revisions Required : Revisions can be made by the Editor in Chief or those who help
Major: Revisions can only be made by authors
Rejected: Not scientific or too much