Hybrid Sampling untuk Meningkatkan Akurasi Deteksi Kanker Serviks pada Data Tidak Seimbang: Kajian Komparatif

Authors

  • Slamet Widodo Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Samudi Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Herlambang Brawijaya Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/jasiek.v7i2.16134

Keywords:

Borderline-SMOTE, Cervical Cancer, Class Imbalance, Early Detection, Resampling

Abstract

Cervical Cancer has a high mortality rate among women, driving the adoption of early detection systems based on machine learning. However, their implementation is hindered by class imbalance issues, as seen in the UCI Cervical Cancer Behavior Risk Dataset, where positive cases constitute only 5.8–7.3% of the data. This study proposes an evaluation of resampling techniques—including SMOTE, ADASYN, Random Undersampling, and Borderline-SMOTE—combined with classification algorithms such as RF, XGBoost, LR, GNB, and k-NN. Using Stratified K-Fold Cross Validation to preserve the original class distribution in each fold and ensuring resampling is applied only to the training data in each iteration, the results demonstrate that Borderline-SMOTE significantly improved model performance. Specifically, the Random Forest model achieved a Recall of 0.87 and an AUC-ROC of 0.94. These findings are expected to provide a foundation for future research focused on optimizing adaptive sampling methods

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization (WHO), “Cervical Cancer,” World Health Organization (WHO), Mar. 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/Cervical-Cancer (accessed Aug. 01, 2025).

N. Al Mudawi and A. Alazeb, “A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer Using Machine learning Algorithms,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 11, p. 4132, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22114132.

M. L. R. University of California, Irvine, “Cervical Cancer (Risk Factors) Data Set,” UCI Repository, 2017.

V. López, A. Fernández, S. García, V. Palade, and F. Herrera, “An insight into classification with imbalanced data: Empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 250, pp. 113–141, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.007.

A. Fernández, S. García, M. Galar, R. C. Prati, B. Krawczyk, and F. Herrera, Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98074-4.

Y. Shi, Y. Wan, K. Wu, and X. Chen, “Non-negativity and locality constrained Laplacian sparse coding for image classification,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 72, pp. 121–129, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.012.

M. L. R. University of California, Irvine, “Cervical Cancer (Risk Factors) Data Set,” UCI Repository, 2017. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Cervical+Cancer+Behavior+Risk

V. López, A. Fernández, S. García, V. Palade, and F. Herrera, “An insight into classification with imbalanced data: Empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 250, pp. 113–141, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.007.

A. Fernández, S. García, M. Galar, R. C. Prati, B. Krawczyk, and F. Herrera, Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98074-4.

Y. Shi, Y. Wan, K. Wu, and X. Chen, “Non-negativity and locality constrained Laplacian sparse coding for image classification,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 72, pp. 121–129, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.012.

N. Almugren and H. Alshamlan, “A survey on hybrid feature selection methods in microarray gene expression data for Cancer classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 78533–78548, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922987.

M. Buda, A. Maki, and M. A. Mazurowski, “A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 106, pp. 249–259, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011.

D. Elreedy and A. F. Atiya, “A Comprehensive Analysis of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 505, pp. 32–64, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070.

G. Kovács, “An empirical comparison and evaluation of minority oversampling techniques on a large number of imbalanced datasets,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 83, p. 105662, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105662.

H. Mo, H. Sun, J. Liu, and S. Wei, “Developing window behavior models for residential buildings using XGBoost algorithm,” Energy Build., vol. 205, pp. 1–23, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109564.

M. Z. Islam, V. Estivill-Castro, M. A. Rahman, and T. Bossomaier, “Combining K-MEANS and a genetic algorithm through a novel arrangement of genetic operators for high quality clustering,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 91, pp. 402–417, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.005.

A. Geron, Aurélien Géron - Hands on Machine learning with Scikit Learn Keras and TensorFlow. 2nd Edition-O’Reilly Media (2019), vol. 1, no. 0. O’Reilly Media, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/5510/5/BAB 2.pdf

K. Fernandes, J. S. Cardoso, and J. Fernandes, “Transfer Learning with Partial Observability Applied to Cervical Cancer Screening,” 2017, pp. 243–250. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58838-4_27.

A. Javed, B. S. Lee, and D. M. Rizzo, “A benchmark study on time series clustering,” arXiv, vol. 1, no. June, p. 100001, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100001.

L. Breiman, Springer Series in Statistics The Elements of. CRC Press, 2017.

T. Chen, “XGBoost : A Scalable Tree Boosting System”.

C. Bishop, Information Science and Statistics. Springer International Publishing, 2006.

K. Murphy, Machine learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, 1st ed. The MIT Press, 2012.

R. Duda, P. Hart, and D. Stork, Patern Classification, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2012.

J. N. Mandrekar, “Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Diagnostic Test Assessment,” J. Thorac. Oncol., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1315–1316, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d.

Ş. K. Çorbacıoğlu and G. Aksel, “Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies,” Turkish J. Emerg. Med., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 195–198, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_182_23.

[S. A. Hicks et al., “On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 5979, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09954-8.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

How to Cite

[1]
S. Widodo, Samudi, and H. Brawijaya, “Hybrid Sampling untuk Meningkatkan Akurasi Deteksi Kanker Serviks pada Data Tidak Seimbang: Kajian Komparatif”, JASIEK, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 188–198, Dec. 2025.