Review Guidelines

General

- Put a mark on the wrong part or the part that needs to be changed
- Put a mark on the right side of the wrong line or line that needs to be changed Title


Details

: Effectiveness, Specifications, and clarity
Abstract: Complete and explain the essence of the article
Keywords: Describe the essential concepts of Article
Introduction: Current, originality, relevance of the topic, compatibility of important reasons for research objects Research
Methods: Must emphasize procedures and data analysis for empirical studies
Results: Analysis of accuracy
Findings: Recent findings, relevance with interrelated researchers, and effects of scientific contributions from findings / ideas for the development of science
Conclusion: Logical, valid, concise, and clear
inputs: practical action, the development of new theories and subsequent research / advanced
Image / Table: The location is central, not truncated, Nice quality to be seen, Title image / table, Called Capitalized
List Library: Current levels and references to the main book sources. Rules: at least 80% of journals or scientific researchers are interrelated, in the last 5 years.


The Complete Manuscript

Writing Process : Is the script easy to follow, that is, has clear logical and organizational development?
Is the script concise and understandable? Any parts that must be reduced,
Eliminated / expanded / added?
Pay attention if there are major problems with mechanics: grammar, punctuation, spelling. (If there are only a few places that don't have a good or right word, make a note to tell the author of a specific place. If there are consistent problems throughout, only select one or two examples if necessary - don't try and edit them all).
Abbreviations: Used wisely and arranged so that the reader will have no trouble remembering what the abbreviations represent.
Follow the style, format and other rules of the journal.
Quotations are given when providing evidence-based information from outside sources. Published


Decision Categories

: No
Minor Revisions Required: Revisions can be made by the Editor in Chief or those who help
Major: Revisions can only be made by authors
Rejected: Not scientific or too much