Design and Implementation of Stepper 28BYJ-48 and Servo MG996R as a Roasting Arm Robot in an Arduino Uno-based Automatic Satay Grill Tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/jeemecs.v5i1.5166Keywords:
Automation, Satay, Arduino, Robotic ArmAbstract
Almost all factories use an automation system because the results are the fastest and better quality. Of course, these are the main factors in utilizing this automation system. However, in-home industries such as satay stalls, it is rare to find this automation technology. So we need a tool that is capable of baking the satay automatically. The solution was obtained by creating a roasting arm robot capable of engineering the satay roasting process based on the 28BYJ-48 stepper motor mechanism and the MG996R servo motor with Arduino UNO based control. This research is qualitative, quantitative experimental research fan. Data were collected by direct observation of the tools and interviews with satay traders. The results show that the roasting arm robot can carry out its duties optimally.
Â
ÂReferences
Syahwil, Muhammad.2013. “Panduan Mudah Simulasi & Praktek Mikrokontrolerâ€
Kadir, A.2017. “Pemrograman Arduino Menggunakan Ardublockâ€. Yogyakarta Penerbit Andi
Marselinus M.2016. “Sistem Alarm Kebakaran Menggunakan Sensor Infra red dan Sensor Suhu Berbasis Arduino Unoâ€. Tugas Akhir. Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Sains Dan Teknik, Universitas Nusa Cendana
Saleh, Muhammad.2017. “Rancang Bangun Sistem Keamanan Rumah Menggunakan Relayâ€. Tugas Akhir. Program Studi Teknik Elektro, Universitas Suryadarma, Jakarta
Nababan, R.Y.2020. “Rancang Bangun Alat Pemanggang Sate Otomatis Dengan Merode PWM Berbasis Mikrokontrolerâ€. Jurnal. Program Studi Teknik Informatika, STMIK Pelita Nusantara, Medan
Hilal, Ahmad.2013. “Pemanfaatan Motor Servo Sebagai Penggerak CCTV Untuk Melihat Alat-Alat Monitor Dan Kondisi Pasien Di Ruang ICUâ€. Jurnal. Program Studi Diploma 3 Teknik Elektro, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro
Ramdhani, Irwan.2012. “Aplikasi Driver Relay ULN-2003 Sebagai Penggerak Konveyor Otomatis Pengelompokan Buku Menggunakan Inisialisasi Barcodeâ€
Alassar, A. Z.2010. “modeling and control of 5DOF Robot Arm Using Supervisory Control. The Islamic University of Gazaâ€. Electrical Engineering. Library IU Gaza.
Hartopo, 1.2018. “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Lengan Robot 3 DOF pada Mata Pelajaran Perekayasaan Sistem Kontrolâ€. Program Keahlian Teknik Elektronika Industri di SMK Negeri 2 Wonosari. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
