Model Kewirausahaan Sosial Berbasis Ekonomi Kreatif dalam Mendukung Sektor Pariwisata di Kota Tasikmalaya

Pandu Adi Cakranegara, Dedi Rianto Rahadi, Sujana Donandi Sinuraya

Abstract


Covid19 contributed to various fields of life including one of the handicraft industries     in Tasimalaya. The craftsmen in Tasikmalaya asked for difficulties in marketing their products because their demand dropped during the pandemic. This research seeks to develop which social entrepreneurship model is suitable for artisans during the Pandemic. The hope is that by applying this social entrepreneurship model, crafters can have financial sustainability. The study is conducted using observations and interviews as well as Participatory Rural Assessments. Based on the results of research and literature studies, this study proposes several alternative social entrepreneurship models that can be applied. In addition, this research also found an important role as well as the government in creating competitive advantage for craftsmen.

https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v8i2.4318


Keywords


Covid-19, Financial Sustainability, Social Business Model, Social Entrepreneur

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adimiharja K, H.H. (2003). Participatory Research Appraisal: Pengabdian Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bandung: Humaniora.

Alisjahbana, Beti. (2009). Merangsang kreatifitas dan Inofasi. Betti alisjahbana’s Blog

Alter, S. K. (2006). Social enterprise models and their mission and money relationships. In A. Nicholls (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Austin, J.E., Leonard, H., Reficco, E., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2004). Corporate social entrepreneurship: A new vision of CSR. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 05-021. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Casadesus-Masanell, R. & Ricart, J.E. (2007). Competing through business models. Working Paper 713, IESE Business School, Barcelona.

Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits: What do you do when traditional sources of funding fall short? Harvard Business Review, pp. 55-67.

Creswell, John W. (2017). Research Desain (Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran). Edisi 4. Terjemahan: Achmad Fawaid dan Rianayati Kusmini Pancasari. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Dees, J.G. & Anderson, B.B. (2003). For-profit social ventures, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education (special issue on social entrepreneurship), 2, 1–26.

Emerson, J. & Twerksy, F. (Eds.). (1996, September). New social entrepreneurs: The success, challenge and lessons of non-profit enterprise creation. San Francisco: Roberts Foundation, Homeless Economic Development Fund.

Hulgard. Lars. (2010). Discourses of social entrepreneurship-variation of the same theme? EMES European Research Network

Martin, Roger L. & Sally Osberg. (2007). Social entrepreneurship the case for definition, Stanford Social Innovation Review 29-39. [Online] Available: www.ssireview.org.

Mercho L. (2014). Social entrepreneurship: A Smarter way to save the world. news.unca.edu. http://news.unca.edu/features/social-entrepreneurship-smarter-way-save-world. Accessed January 3, 2018

Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research 58, 726– 735.

Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (eds.) (2013), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Nicholls, Alex (2006). Social Entrepreneurship New Models Of Sustainable Social Change, Oxford University Press Inc.: New York

Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Reis, T. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and Entrepreneurship For The Common Good: A Scan, Synthesis And Scenario For Action. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Santosa, S.P. (2007). Peran socio entreprenurship dalam pembangunan. Makalah dipaparkan dalam acara dialog “Membangun Sinergisitas Bangsa Menuju Indonesia Yang Inovatif, Inventif dan Kompetitif” diselenggarakan oleh Himpunan IESPFE-Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 14 Mei 2007

Silalahi, Ulber. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Reflika Aditama

Sledzik, Karol (2013). “Schumpeter‟s view on innovation and entrepreneurship”, Journal of Social Scence Research Network

Thompson, J. L., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2 000). Social entrepreneurship: A new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(6), 328–338

Wolfgang, Grassl. (2012). Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity, ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives 1(1) 37 – 60

Zadek, S. & Thake, S. (1997, June 20). Send in the social entrepreneurs. New Statesman, 26, 31.

Zahra, S. A., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 117–131

Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2010). The business model: Theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research. Working Paper 862, IESE Business School, Barcelona




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v8i2.4318

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Indexing by:

width="150" crossref
width=150;SINTA - Science and Technology Index

 

Index Copernicus International (ICI)

Tools:

TurnitinMendeley - Library 101 Citation Management Tools - Research guides at  University of Toronto

 

In Collaboration with:


 


Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan

Management Department Faculty of Economics

University of Merdeka Malang

MAILING ADDRESS
Terusan Dieng Street 62-64, Sukun, Malang City, East Java, 65146, Indonesia
Phone: 081332569864
Email: [email protected]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.