Implementation of "Judicial Pardon" for Minors Based on the National Criminal Code and SPPA

Authors

  • Dony Setiawan Putra Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/jp.v22i1.16000

Keywords:

Judicial Pardon, Perpetrator (Child), Serious Crime, Criminal Code, SPPA Law

Abstract

Judicial Pardon is a new sentencing guideline contained in the Indonesian National Criminal Code, the existence of Judicial Pardon or the forgiveness of this judge is especially for perpetrators who have indeed committed minor criminal acts, but the regulation is not cumulative where in pardon the judge does not only look at the lightness of the criminal act, but also about the person of the perpetrator and the circumstances at the time the criminal act was committed. Especially in perpetrators (children) based on the UUSPPA prioritizes restorative justice, namely non-formal or out-of-court settlements, but for serious crimes it must be resolved in a formal court, namely through a criminal decision by a judge. The purpose of this study is to describe and solve the legal problems that occur to the perpetrator (children), especially minors and also the process of applying Judicial Pardon for children who commit serious crimes, the formulation of the problem raised first is whether the criminal guidelines regarding ''Judicial Pardon'' can be applied to minors based on the National Criminal Code and UUSPPA, the second is how to settle the law regarding serious crimes committed by minors. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the first research in the National Criminal Code and UUSPPA have regulated the Judicial Pardon where the National Criminal Code implements the SPPA Law so that it can be applied not only to children but also to adults, related to the application of judge's pardon is indeed specifically for the perpetrator (child), but for the perpetrator (child) who commits a serious criminal act must be punished,  They (children) should be given a "Judicial Pardon" halfway or not absolutely, in other words, they are forgiven, but they are still given action regarding the serious crime that has been committed. Second, the legal settlement that occurs to the perpetrator (child) can be done by means of Judicial Pardon considering that the article that regulates Judicial Pardon is not cumulative because there is a comma and or so that if one of them is fulfilled, the Judge can grant a Judicial Pardon One of them is looking at the personal side of the perpetrator (child) where children still have a labile mindset so that they can still be directed to be good and acceptable to the community again.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dony Setiawan Putra, Universitas Brawijaya

Faculty of Law

References

Adriana, Made Nisa. Peran Orang Tua dalam Pembinaan Anak Berkonflik dengan Hukum, Sudah Optimalkah?. Kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/made02326/64842a364d498a5081009853/peran-orang-tua-pada-pembinaan-anak-berkonflik-dengan-hukum-sudah-optimalkah

Atmasasmita, Romli. Teori dan Kapita Selekta Kriminologi. Bandung: PT Eresco. (2004). 38

Chazawi, Adami. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1. Jakata: Raja Grafindo Persada. (2007). 157

Hamzah, Andi. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita. (1993). 1

Hiariej, Eddy O.S & Topo Santoso, Anotasi KUHP Nasional. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. (2025). 156

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip – Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka. (2016). 41

Kartanegara, Satochid. Hukum Pidana (Kumpuan Kuliah) Bagian I. Balai Lektur Mahasiswa. 205

Loewy, Arnold H. Criminal Law In A Nutshell, Fifth Edition. West: A Thomson Reuters Business. (2009). 1

Marlina. Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia (Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan RJ). Bandung: Refika Aditama. (2009). 164

Morris, Allison dan C.Brielle Maxwell. Restorative Justice for Juveniles ; Conferencing Mediation and Circles, Oxford-Portland: Hart Publising. (2001). 3

Mudzakkir, Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Bidang Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Pemidanaan (Politik Hukum dan Pemidanaan), Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, (2008). 10

Mukti, Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Hukum Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (2010). 34

Nurini Aprilianda, dkk. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Teori dan Praktik). Malang: UB Press, (2017). 119

Pradipta, Krisna. Tempo, Aturan Pidana untuk Anak dibawah Umur, (2024). https://www.tempo.co/infografik/infografik/aturan-pidana-untuk-anak-di-bawah-umur-1143549

Pramukti, Angger Sigit dan Fuady Primaharsya. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia. (2015). 17

Remmelink, Jam. Hukum Pidana : Komentar atas Pasal – Pasal Terpenting Dalam KUHP Belanda dan Padanannya dalam UU Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. (2003). 390

Rodliyah dan Salim H.S. Pengantar Hukum Pidana (Mengacu pada KUHP Baru UU No.1 Tahun 2023). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. (2024). 77

Sahetapy, J.E. Pidana Mati dalam Negara Pancasila. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. (2007). 93

Sahetapy, J.E. Suatu Studi Khusus Mengenai Ancaman Pidana Mati terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. (1982). 283

Sholehuddin, M. Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana (Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. (2003). 111

Sudarto. Hukum Pidana I : Edisi Revisi, Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto – Fakultas Hukum UNDIP. (2013). 157

Susanti, Emilia dan Eko Rahardjo, Buku Ajar Hukum dan Kriminologi. Lampung: Anugrah Utama Raharja. (2018). 8

UNICEF, Child Protection Information Sheet, (2006)

Waluyo, Bambang. Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. (2008). 33

Zehr, Howard. Changing Lenses (A New Focus for Crime and Justice), Pensylvania: Herald Press. (1990). 181

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

Dony Setiawan Putra. (2025). Implementation of "Judicial Pardon" for Minors Based on the National Criminal Code and SPPA. Jurnal Penelitian, 22(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.26905/jp.v22i1.16000

Issue

Section

Social and Humaniora