Analysis of Energy Absorption of Soft Body Armor with Experimental Method and Finite Element Method Using STF (Shear Thickening Fluid) Composite Material
Abstract
Body armor is personal protective equipment or shield clothing for soldiers that has existed since Roman times until now. The function of body armor is to protect the body from attacks by foreign objects by absorbing energy. Body armor must have ballistic resistance and stabbing resistance, however, body armor that is often found usually has a high anti-ballistic level but is low in receiving stabbing attacks. STF (Shear Thickening Fluid) is a composite material which is unique in that the viscosity level can change in a way that causes the liquid dispersion to become solid and allows for increased stabbing resistance. This research began by making Kevlar samples which were then mixed with STF and then subjected to tensile testing to obtain material properties that were useful for simulating with FEM. The simulation is intended to analyze the rate of energy absorption that occurs in the sample. The results show that the kinetic energy absorption rate of the bullet is absorbed at a viscosity of 87%. The small energy that occurs is also absorbed in the form of frictional resistance with a value of 11.9%. The identified comparison results show that in cases 1-3 the percentage of viscosity is high so it is viscous, whereas in case 4 the direct reflection of the viscosity is low so it is close to liquid.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
D. Weerasinghe, D. Mohotti, and J. Anderson, “Incorporation of shear thickening fluid effects into computational modelling of woven fabrics subjected to impact loading: A review,” Int. J. Prot. Struct., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 340–378, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2041419619889071.
J. Ding, P. Tracey, W. Li, G. Peng, P. G. Whitten, and G. G. Wallace, “Review on Shear Thickening Fluids and Applications,” Text. Light Ind. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 161–173, 2013.
M. A. Abtew, F. Boussu, P. Bruniaux, C. Loghin, and I. Cristian, “Ballistic impact mechanisms – A review on textiles and fibre-reinforced composites impact responses,” Compos. Struct., vol. 223, no. March, p. 110966, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110966.
C. E. Coltman, B. R. Brisbine, R. H. Molloy, N. B. Ball, W. A. Spratford, and J. R. Steele, “Identifying problems that female soldiers experience with current-issue body armour,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 94, no. February, p. 103384, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103384.
M. Bajya, A. Majumdar, B. S. Butola, S. K. Verma, and D. Bhattacharjee, “Design strategy for optimising weight and ballistic performance of soft body armour reinforced with shear thickening fluid,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 183, no. August 2019, p. 107721, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107721.
I. G. Crouch, “Critical interfaces in body armour systems,” Def. Technol., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1887–1894, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2020.11.006.
Y. Yang, “Study on Ballistic Performance of Hybrid Soft Body Armour,” pp. 1–210, 2015.
J. Naveen, K. Jayakrishna, M. T. Bin Hameed Sultan, and S. M. M. Amir, “Ballistic Performance of Natural Fiber Based Soft and Hard Body Armour- A Mini Review,” Front. Mater., vol. 7, no. December, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fmats.2020.608139.
A. A. Johnson, G. A. Bingham, and C. E. Majewski, “The design and assessment of bio-inspired additive manufactured stab-resistant armour,” Virtual Phys. Prototyp., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 49–57, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1369438.
M. A. Abtew, F. Boussu, and P. Bruniaux, “Dynamic impact protective body armour: A comprehensive appraisal on panel engineering design and its prospective materials,” Def. Technol., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 2027–2049, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.03.016.
A. Ghazlan, T. Ngo, P. Tan, Y. M. Xie, P. Tran, and M. Donough, “Inspiration from Nature’s body armours – A review of biological and bioinspired composites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 205, no. October 2020, p. 108513, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108513.
Y. Xu, X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z. Yuan, “Stabbing resistance of body armour panels impregnated with shear thickening fluid,” Compos. Struct., vol. 163, pp. 465–473, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.056.
A. D. Putra, M. Rohman, and M. Sulaiman, “Simulasi Pengaruh Waktu dan Gerak Terhadap Desain Implan Sendi Pinggul,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Mesin Undiksha, vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 23–31, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jptm.v9i1.28885.
F. Amalia, “Karakterisasi Struktur Mikro Komposit Al-ZrSiO 4 dengan Scanning Electron Microscopy ( SEM ) dan X-Ray Diffraction ( XRD ),” no. April, pp. 200–203, 2015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jtmt.v19i2.10248
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
TRANSMISI Universitas Merdeka Malang Mailing Address: Jalan Terusan Dieng 62-64 Malang, 65146, East Java, Indonesia This work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |