Enhancing Governance and Development: Analyzing Performance Management Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/j-tragos.v3i2.15846Keywords:
development, governance, performance, management, qualitativeAbstract
In the ever-evolving landscape of governance and development, understanding the nuances of performance management becomes paramount. This study explores the dynamics within Armstrong's performance management cycle in the Pamekasan Regency case, which sheds light on the dominant aspects and unveils opportunities for improvement. This research employs a qualitative approach through a case study method. At the same time, the data analysis is conducted utilizing QSR NVivo software to offer an in-depth exploration of performance management dynamics in the Pamekasan Regency. The findings of this study highlight the crucial significance of the planning phase within the performance management cycle of Pamekasan Regency. It reflects the steadfast commitment of the local government to articulate and pursue clear development plans. The set performance objective emerges as the most influential indicator, emphasizing the practical importance of well-defined objectives in guiding and evaluating development initiatives. The review phase follows closely with a commendable coefficient of about 77%. While the monitor phase shows the lowest score at 55%, this suggests that while the review phase performs well, attention and improvements are particularly needed in optimizing activities during the monitoring phase. Achieving a more holistic strategy will contribute to the overall effectiveness of Pamekasan Regency's performance management cycle.
Downloads
References
Abane, Juliana, A. & Phianaitrup, Boon. A. 2017. Performance management as an alternative tool for local governance: evidence from Ghanaian local government sector. International journal of human resource studies, 7(3), 188. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v7i3.11532.
Alam, B. (2023). Implementation of Village Fund Management in Acceleration of Development in Sukojati Village Banyuwangi Regency. Journal of Transformative Governance and Social Justice, 1(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.26905/j-tragos.v1i2.10127
Amali, A. C. (2024). Accountability and Transparency of Village Fund Management in Wonosalam Village. Journal of Transformative Governance and Social Justice, 2(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.26905/j-tragos.v2i2.13559
Amstrong, Michael (2015), “Performance Management 5th Edition”. London Philadelphia and New Delhi: Kogan Page.
Amaratunga & Baldy. 2000. Assessment of facilities management performance in higher education properties. facilities, 18(7/8), 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770010340681
Amaratunga et al., 2002. Moving from performance measurement to performance management. facilities, 20(5/6), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770210426701
Bouckaert, G. & Peters, B.G. (2002). Performance measurement and management. The Achilles’ heel in administrative modernization, Public Performance and Management Review, 25, pp. 359–362.
Boyne, G. A. (2003). Source of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 367-394.
Behn, Robert D. 2003. Why measure performance? different purposes require different measures. public administration review, 63(5), 586-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-
Ciobanica, Mihaela L. 2016. Performance management in public organizations., 182-200. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315643113-12
Ding, et al., 2016. Assessment of innovative performance management in the chinese police system. public personnel management, 45(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026016630368
Driessen et al., 2010. Subjective performance assessment of innovation projects*. journal of product innovation management, 27(4), 572-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00736.x
Elearn, Development For High Performance, Routledge (2009).
Fryer, B., Antony, J., & Douglas, A. (2009). Critical success factors of continuous improvement in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(3), 203-221. doi:10.1108/09513550910952767 used: Armstrong and Baron's model influential in shaping performance management systems, particularly in the public sector
Holzer, M. & Yang, K. (2004). Performance measurement and improvement: an assessment of the state of the art. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70, pp. 15–31.
Hyndman, N., & McKillop, D. (2019). Accounting for the public sector at a time of crisis. Abacus, 55(3), 437-451.
Jurnali, Teddy & Khalid, Abdul. 2015. Performance management system for local government: the Indonesian experience. global business review, 16(3), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923.
Kamran, M., Farooq, F., & Zia-ur-Rehman, M. (2020). Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 3(3), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v3i3.67.
Kandula, S.R. 2014. Performance Management: Strategies, Interventions, Drivers, Delhi, Sage Publication.
Kariuki, Paul & Reddy, Poovendhree. 2019. Fostering a culture of performance management in municipalities: perceptions of municipal m & e practitioners in Kwazulu Natal. journal of economics and behavioral studies, 11(3(J)), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v11i3(j).2872.
Mangar, Jembris T., dkk. 2021. Manajemen Kinerja Sekretariat Daerah Halmahera Barat Terkait Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP)
Martin, John & Spano, Alessandro. 2015. Performance management system for local government: the Indonesian experience. global business review, 16(3), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923.
Mascio, Fabrizio & Natalini, Alessandro. 2013. Context and mechanisms in administrative reform processes: performance management within Italian local government. international public management journal, 16(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.796263.
Morgan, J., & Rayner, C. (2011). Enhancing personal performance in the workplace: A comparison between person-environment fit theories and organizational support theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 588-597. doi:10.1037/a0021867 used: Person-environment fit is considered in enhancing personal performance in the workplace setting, aligning with Armstrong's perspective
Muhtar et al., 2021. Performance accountability in Indonesian local governments: does monitoring work? international journal of business and society, 22(3), 1673-1692. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4329.2021
Ock, J., & Oswald, S. L. (2015). The role of performance appraisal in performance management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1239-1248. doi:10.1037/apl0000012 used: Accurate performance appraisal is a crucial prerequisite for an effective performance management system
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Petera, et al., 2020. Strategic management accounting and strategic management: the mediating effect of performance evaluation and rewarding. international journal of industrial engineering and management, (2), 116-133. https://doi.org/10.24867/ijiem-2020-2-258
Parker et al., 2013. Critical evaluation of project‐based performance management. international journal of productivity and performance management, 62(4), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311329634
Rusu, T., & Vlăduțescu, Ş. C. (2016). Performance management in the context of organizational change. Management & Marketing, 11(2), 332-347. doi:10.1515/mocks-2016-0019 used: Emphasizes the importance of organizations considering performance management within their context
Rivenbark et al., 2018. Exploring performance management in Italian local government: the necessity of outcome measures and citizen participation. the american review of public administration, 49(5), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018775125
Sholihin, Mahfud, et al., 2010. Reliance on multiple performance measures and manager performance. journal of applied accounting research, 11(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675421011050018
Sahu, Measuring Service Quality in an Academic Library: an Indian Case Study, Library Review (2007).
Sanderson, Ian. 2001. Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘modern’ local government. public administration, 79(2), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00257.
Sanger, Mary B. 2008. From measurement to management: breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. public administration review, 68(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00980.x.
Sosu, Justice N. 2015. From performance management to strategic local government leadership: lessons from different cultural settings. public money & management, 35(4), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1047276.
Sanger, Mary B. 2008. From measurement to management: breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. public administration review, 68(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00980.x
Tobin & Lee Seung Joo. 2011. Does Management Performance Impact Citizen Satisfaction? The American Review of Public Administration, 42 (4): 419-436. doi: 10.1177/0275074011408589
Widajatun, V.W & Kristiastuti, Francisca. 2021. Implementation of government performance accountability system (sakip) in Indonesian local government (case of regional development planning board of Sukabumi regency). jurnal manajemen pelayanan publik, 5(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v5i1.34738.
Winoto, S. (2021). Strategy to Improve Accountability and Performance Management in Pamekasan Regency Government. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 7(3): 334-340. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2021.007.03.3
Zamawe F. C. (2015). The Implication of Using NVivo Software in Qualitative Data Analysis: Evidence-Based Reflections. Malawi medical journal: the journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 27(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v27i1.4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Transformative Governance and Social Justice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
(1) Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
(2) Publisher of the Journal of Transformative Governance and Social Justice (J-TRAGOS) is the University of Merdeka Malang.
(3) The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution “ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt” remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.
