Analisis Yuridis Sosiologis Pelaksanaan Pengendalian Aksi Massa di Stadion Kanjuruhan Kepanjen

Budiarso Enggalani, Teguh Suratman

Abstract


The tragedy that occurred at Kanjuruhan Stadium, Malang Regency on October 1, 2022, became a widely spotlighted event. On that day, a football match between Arema and Persebaya ended in riots that resulted in 131 deaths and hundreds of injuries. A case study of the Kanjuruhan Stadium tragedy is important to analyze whether the mass control strategies implemented by the Indonesian National Police (Polri) were in line with the established regulations and the police code of ethics that uphold human rights. Based on this background, the author will analyze firstly; what were the obstacles faced by the Riot Control Unit (PHH) of the Brimob unit of Polri in managing the mass action at Kanjuruhan Stadium, Malang Regency on October 1, 2022, in reference to Perkap NRI No. 1 of 2009 and Protap No. 1/X/2010, and secondly; how is the juridical-sociological analysis of the standard strategies of the Riot Control Unit (PHH) of the Brimob unit of Polri in managing mass actions according to Perkap NRI No. 1 of 2009 and Protap No. 1/X/2010. In this research, the author employs the Empirical Juridical Analysis method. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the obstacles faced by the Riot Control Unit (PHH) of the Brimob unit of Polri in managing the mass action at Kanjuruhan Stadium, Malang Regency, are hindered by a paradigm, particularly among law enforcement officers, that views the incident as a disaster. The legal process of the Kanjuruhan tragedy did not receive extensive media coverage. The supervision by the DPR's Commission III over its partners such as Polri and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights has not been carried out in detail. The Standard Strategy for Mass Control by the Riot Control Unit (PHH) of the Brimob unit of Polri According to the Applicable Provisions. The implementation of the mass control strategy by the Riot Control Unit (PHH) of the Brimob unit of Polri at Kanjuruhan Stadium, Malang on October 1, 2022, according to the applicable provisions, includes pre-emptive measures, which are initial actions taken by the police in issuing warnings and approaching riot groups to maintain order. Preventive measures are efforts carried out by the police in performing their duties according to standard procedures (Protap). Repressive measures are the last actions taken by the police when the riot has become uncontrollable.


Keywords


Juridical Analysis, Control, Mass Action

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhelia, R., Hafidz, M., & Ahmad, K. (2021). Tanggungjawab Kepolisian Dalam Penanganan, Keamanan, Dan Ketertiban Masyarakat Di Kota Makassar. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 2(1), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlg.v2i1.322

Akhyan, A. (2014). Strategi Kepolisian Dalam Penanganan Potensi Kerusuhan Massa Pada Konser Musik Di Kabupaten Kudus. https://eprints.umk.ac.id/2978/

Athoillah, M. F., Trijono, R., & Aminulloh, M. (2024). Implementasi Protap Korps Brimob dalam Menangani Kerusuhan Massa. 3(4), 4695–4702. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i4.12916

Febriana, I., Bihaqqis, R. A., Sari, W., Dewi, R., Yuridin, Y., Sulhan, S., & Kadir, S. A. (2024). State Reconciliation in Resolving Cases of Past Serious Human Rights Violations (Case Study of the Trisakti Tragedy and May 1998 Riots). Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(3), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v3i3.7847

Himawan, E. M., Pohlman, A., & Louis, W. (2021). Memahami Dinamika Psikologis Individu Yang Turut Terlibat Dalam Kerusuhan Massa Mei 1998: Sebuah Kerangka Psikologis. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu464

Khairunisyah, K. (2024). Implementasi Doktrin Tanggungjawab Komando Dalam Berbagai Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Indonesia. Jurnal Jatiswara, 39(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v39i1.549

Khusna, N. Z., Rahman, N. A., & Qorib, N. F. (2024). Persekutuan Banser dan Aparat Negara Dalam Peristiwa Ninja Di Jawa 1998-1999 M. Batuthah Jurnal Sejarah Padaban Islam, 3(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.38073/batuthah.v3i1.1256

Lestari, S., & Bahmid, B. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Terhadap Penghasut Untuk Melakukan Unjuk Rasa Yang Berakibat Anarkis. JURNAL PIONIR, 6(2). http://www.jurnal.una.ac.id/index.php/pionir/article/download/1241/1052

Rahayu, A. R. (2024). Kerusuhan Mei 1998: Tragedi Etnis Tionghoa di Jakarta. Deleted Journal, 3(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.31258/hjps.3.2.104-115

Rewiyaga, R., & Putra, M. R. S. (2024). Analisis Peristiwa Kanjuruhan Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum. JLEB Journal of Law Education and Business, 2(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v2i1.1531

Saputra, S. (2019). Efektivitas Penggunaan Kekuatan oleh Kepolisian Dalam Menangani Aksi Unjuk Rasa Anarkis Di Kota Padang. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 3(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v3i3.121

Sari, D. S. R., & Wahyudi, K. E. (2024). Efektivitas Strategi Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Kota Madiun Dalam Penertiban Pedagang Kaki Lima. JIAP (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 12(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.31764/jiap.v12i1.21770

Sukmana, W. J., Anis, M. Z. A., & Mansyur, M. (2024). Interaksi Sosial Masyarakat Dayak dan Madura di Kuala Pembuang 1 Kabupaten Seruyan Pasca Kerusuhan Sampit Tahun 2006-2017. Prabayaksa Journal of History Education, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.20527/pby.v4i1.12104

Sulaiman, E. M. (2021). Objektivitas Pemberitaan Kerusuhan Massa Saat Demo Penolakan Ruu Cipta Kerja (Analisis Isi Berita di Media Online Okezone.com Periode 1-31 Oktober 2020). https://eprints.umm.ac.id/74373/

Susilowati, W. H., & Hastuti, N. T. (2011). Kedudukan Hirarki Prosedur Tetap Bagi Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Menangani Kerusuhan Massa Dan Hubungannya Dengan HAM. Perspektif, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v16i1.65

Wahyudi, D. (2020). Kerusuhan Massa oleh Supporter Persebaya. Al-Qanun Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, 22(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2019.22.2.283-301




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v5i1.14002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


MLJ Merdeka Law Journal

Postgraduate - University of Merdeka Malang

Postgraduate Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64
Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.

View MLJ Visitors
web statistics

Other Link

Follow Us

[email protected]

Phone (0341) 580161
Faks (0341) 588395

bhouhttp://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/mlj/


MLJ Merdeka Law Journal  Creative Commons License  This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.