Email this article 
Penerapan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Penggelapan Terkait Jaminan Fidusia
Abstract
Fiduciary is a process of transferring ownership rights to an object based on trust, provided that the object remains in the control of the owner of the object. The implementation of this form of engagement is a hire purchase agreement between the creditor and the debtor, where this engagement does not always run smoothly. There are times when the debtor commits embezzlement, namely by deliberately transferring the hand of the fiduciary collateral object without the creditor's permission. The purpose of this research is to examine the application of legal regulations to debtors who commit criminal acts of fraud and embezzlement related to fiduciary guarantees and the basis for consideration by Supreme Court Judge Number 485 K/Pid/2020. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of this research include that in the Fiduciary Guarantee Law there are criminal sanctions for debtors (fiduciary givers) who commit acts of transferring fiduciary collateral objects without prior approval from the fiduciary recipient (creditor). Meanwhile, in the Criminal Code it is included in the crime of embezzlement, namely Article 372. The basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the case is 1). Whereas the defendant has been proven to have harmed the victim witness; 2). The defendant did not return the victim's losses.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Attamimi, M. F., Wantu, F. M., & Sarson, M. T. Z. (2024). Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia: Studi Kasus Di Polresta Gorontalo Kota. Deleted Journal, 1(7), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.62335/tv8xph32
Budhaeri, L. K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur pada Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Debitur. Deleted Journal, 4(3), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v4i3.2292
Dhafa, A. M. (2024). Sistem Akuntansi Pemberian Kredit Dan Perhitungan Bunga Kredit Angsuran Sistem Fidusia (Kreasi) Pada Pt. Pegadaian (Persero) Cilimus. Jurnal CENDEKIA Jaya, 6(2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.47685/cendekia-jaya.v6i2.555
Dharma, Y. A., & Lubis, S. D. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Peralihan Jaminan Fidusia Kepada Pihak Ketiga Tanpa Sepengetahuan Kreditur. Jurisprudensi Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Perundang-undangan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8555
Kurniawan, D. H., & Badriyah, S. M. (2024). Kesepakatan Wanprestasi dan Pernyataan Sukarela dalam Putusan MK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Kekuatan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 24(2), 1137. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v24i2.5259
P, N. M. Y., Ikhsan, E., Barus, U. M., & Andriati, S. L. (2024). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Parate Eksekusi yang Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.696
Pratama, B. P., & Octaris, H. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Usaha atas Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Jaminan Fidusia Pada Tahap Penyidikan. Deleted Journal, 1(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.60034/1w1x4g53
Saputra, T. A., Fitryantica, A., Mahmudin, R., Sanjaya, E. W., Sembiring, B. G., Risdianto, E., Permana, A., Budiman, A., & Rumahlatu, A. (2024). Sosialisasi Hukum Penarikan Kendaraan Bermotor Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Di Desa Tugu Utara Kec.Cisarua Kab.Bogor. Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 3(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.59066/jppm.v3i2.686
Sianturi, N. N., Napitupulu, D. R., & Betlehn, A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Pengambilan Paksa Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Lembaga Pembiayaan. Action Research Literate, 8(7), 2067–2082. https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v8i7.468
Sibri, L., Asyhadi, F., & Abas, M. (2024). Upaya Kepolisian Dalam Mengamankan Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Nomor 8 Tahun 2011. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.785
Siregar, D., Wahyuni, S., Surbakti, N. E. B., Lubis, V. S., & Zebua, R. P. (2024). Analisis Legalitas Aset Kripto Sebagai Obyek Jaminan di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 11(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v11i1.6954
Sundari, A., Ruchendi, H., & Dinarwati, S. (2024). Prosedur Administrasi Pembayaran Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Pada PT. Federal International Finance (Fifgroup) Cabang Subang. The World of Financial Administration Journal. https://doi.org/10.37950/wfaj.v6i1.2044
Syaifudin, A. (2024). Mengungkap Hukum Jaminan Konvensional dan Syariah Dalam Perjanjian Bisnis. Yurispruden Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 7(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v7i2.21263
Utomo, D. T. B., Dewi, M. A., & Widyawati, A. M. J. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan MK Nomor 2/PUUXIX/2021. GANEC SWARA, 18(2), 602. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i2.836
Umami, A. M., & Alwajdi, M. F. (2024). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Paska Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Menurut Teori Keadilan Hukum. GANEC SWARA, 18(2), 730. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i2.853
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v5i1.14037
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Postgraduate - University of Merdeka Malang Postgraduate Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64 | Other Link | Follow Us | |||||
|
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal |
