Menyoal Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Mediator dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Para Pihak Terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya
Keywords:
Notary, Mediator, Dispute Resolution, Notary's Code of Ethics, Notary Profession LawAbstract
This research examines the position of notaries as mediators in resolving civil disputes related to the deeds they have prepared. It aims to analyze how this mediation role can be performed without violating the Notary's Code of Ethics and the Notary Profession Law (UUJN), and to identify approaches for implementing mediation by notaries, including mechanisms, procedures, and potential challenges. Employing an empirical legal research method through direct observation and interviews at notary offices in Malang City, alongside legal and sociological approaches, the study concludes that notaries can indeed act as mediators, consistent with their status as trusted public officials. While mediator certification from the Supreme Court is ideally preferred, practical demand often leads individuals to directly request mediation services from the notary who drafted their deeds. The notary's facilitative role in mediation, aimed at achieving peaceful, out-of-court settlements, is found not to conflict with the UUJN or Article 2 Chapter II of the Notary's Code of Ethics, given that notaries are required to maintain professionalism, high moral integrity, and neutrality. However, since explicit regulations for this role are currently lacking, the research recommends the expansion of notaries' authority as mediators through clear and definitive legal frameworks. It also advises notaries in Malang City to uphold professionalism and neutrality as per Article 3 of the Notary's Code of Ethics, focusing on their facilitative role to prevent potential conflicts of interest.
Downloads
References
Amin, F., Busthami, D., & Ramadani, R. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Akta Perdamaian Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Deleted Journal, 4(1), 18–33. Https://Doi.Org/10.56087/Qawaninjih.V4i1.440
Cindarputera, R., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Persoalanpenyuluhan Hukum Dan Mediasi. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(3). Https://Doi.Org/10.58258/Jisip.V6i3.3371
Faizal, N. H., & Indratirini, N. I. (2024). Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kenotariatan. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JUPENDIS), 2(2), 307–317. Https://Doi.Org/10.54066/Jupendis.V2i2.1659
Firmansyah, Y. R. (2017). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Perdamaian Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris Dan Putusan Akta Perdamaian Pengadilan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 8(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.26905/Idjch.V8i2.2114
Gunawan, I. K. A., Sumardika, I. N., & Widiati, I. A. P. (2020). Penetapan Honorarium Notaris Dalam Praktik Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(2), 369–373. Https://Doi.Org/10.22225/Jkh.2.1.2547.369-373
Hutasoit, B., Adnyani, N. K. S., & Dantes, K. F. (2021). Eksistensi Notaris Sebagai Mediator Sengketa Kenotariatan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (Studi Kasus Kantor Notaris Di Kota Singaraja). Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(2), 405–415. Https://Doi.Org/10.23887/Jatayu.V4i2.38093
Ningsih, A. (2019). Kedudukan Notaris Dalam Mediasi Sengketa Kenotariatan Dengan Akta Perdamaian. ETD Unsyiah, 1(1). Https://Etd.Unsyiah.Ac.Id/Index.Php?P=Show_Detail&Id=58162
Ningsih, A., Arani, F., & Adwani, A. (2019). Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Mediator Sengketa Kenotariatan Terkait Dengan Kewajiban Penyuluhan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 13(2), 201. Https://Doi.Org/10.30641/Kebijakan.2019.V13.201-228
Panjaitan, W. N. (2022). Akta Perdamaian Oleh Notaris Sebagai Mediator Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. PATTIMURA Legal Journal, 1(3), 222–230. Https://Doi.Org/10.47268/Pela.V1i3.7507
Raharjo, A. (2008). Mediasi Sebagai Basis Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 20(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.22146/Jmh.16316
Rahmawati, E., & Mantili, R. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal Of Law), 3(2), 240–260. Https://Doi.Org/10.22304/Pjih.V3n2.A2
Saputra, M. T. P., & Mahartayasa, I. M. (2015). Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Mediator Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Kertha Semaya, 3(04). Http://Ojs.Unud.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Kerthasemaya/Article/View/13353
Sari, E. P. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kenotariatan Melalui Upaya Mediasi Oleh Notaris. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 1(3), 944–952. Https://Doi.Org/10.58344/Jmi.V1i3.89
Sinaga, N. A. (2020). Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik. JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA, 10(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.35968/Jh.V10i2.460
Wicaksono, S. (2021). Reformulasi Pengaturan Penilaian Ahli Oleh Notaris Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Mimbar Keadilan, 14(1), 117–127. Https://Doi.Org/10.30996/Mk.V14i1.4639
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is applied when mandated by research funders, such as those who have signed. Open Access articles in MLJ Merdeka Law Journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
