Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Debitur Kredit Macet Akibat Praktek Cessie dalam Perjanjian Perbankan

Authors

  • Juliman Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v6i2.16374

Keywords:

Bad credit, Cessie/ Debt Transfer, Creditor, Debtor

Abstract

Debtors who default often make creditors choose a quick mechanism to recover their receivables, one of which is through cession or the transfer of receivables to a third party. Although the practice of cession is legal and recognized in the Indonesian legal system, until now there is no specific regulation that specifically regulates the procedure, thus opening the opportunity for actions that are detrimental to debtors, especially those who have relatively small remaining debts but are still the object of transfer without adequate notification. This study uses a normative method with a descriptive analytical approach to examine the regulation of cession and legal protection for debtors. Legally, cession is regulated in the Civil Code Book III on Contracts as well as several special regulations such as the Mortgage Law, the Fiduciary Law, and Bank Indonesia provisions. In principle, cession can be carried out as long as it is agreed by the parties through a new agreement. However, if the transfer of receivables is carried out without notification to the debtor, the agreement is potentially invalid because the object of the receivable is still attached to the debtor. Thus, the transfer of receivables that is not informed to the debtor can be cancelled or even void by law, thus providing legal protection for the debtor from the implementation of a detrimental assignment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambarwati, A. D. (2019). Perjanjian pengikatan jual beli hak atas tanah yang terikat jaminan bank (Studi kasus Putusan Nomor 704K/PDT/2016). Indonesian Notary, 1(001). http://notary.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/download/31/30

Anisah, S. (2009). Perlindungan terhadap kepentingan kreditor melalui actio pauliana. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art3

Christy, E., Wilsen, W., & Rumaisa, D. (2020). Kepastian hukum hak preferensi pemegang hak tanggungan dalam kasus kepailitan. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i2.14909

Fitriana, N. D., & Abdul Wahid, N. (2021). Upaya hukum cessionaris terhadap hak tagih atas jaminan hak tanggungan berdasarkan pengalihan hutang (cessie). Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i2.808

Fuady, M. (2006). Segi-segi hukum perjanjian (Cet. 4). Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marwansyah, S. (2014). Analisis penerapan prinsip “5C” terhadap akurasi analisa kredit pada PT. First Indo American Leasing. Moneter: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v1i2.949

Maryoso, I., & Ramadhan, M. C. (2021). Pelaksanaan lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan melalui media internet masa pandemi Covid-19 berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Studi pada KPKNL Medan). Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.694

Maslikan, & Sukarmi. (2018). Kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan akta otentik berkaitan dengan kontrak kerjasama. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2526

Monada, T., Adiwijaya, A. J. S., & Bahar, U. (2021). Eksekusi putusan hakim terhadap objek hak tanggungan yang telah dilakukan cessie. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 13(2), 84–90. https://ojs.unida.ac.id/livinglaw/article/download/4401/2580

Nasution, A. (2018). Pelunasan hutang terhadap jaminan fidusia. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat, 17(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v17i3.594

Rahmadinata, Y. (2022). Pengalihan piutang secara cessie sebagai alternatif penyelesaian kredit dan akibat hukumnya terhadap jaminan hutang debitur. Recital Review, 4(1), 25–61. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i1.15273

Rahman, A. (2016). Pelaksanaan perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur atas hilangnya objek jaminan fidusia dalam perjanjian kredit di KBPR Eka Usaha Jember. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1935

Rahman, S., & Rinaldy, E. (2013). Hukum surat berharga pasar uang. Sinar Grafika

Sakkirang, S. (2011). Hukum perdata. Teras

Widjaja, A. (2018). Pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan hak tanggungan dalam penyelesaian kredit macet di lembaga perbankan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p001

Widjaja, G., & Sapardan, E. P. (2006). Seri aspek hukum dalam pasar modal. PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Yangin, F. Y. (2016). Analisis hukum pengalihan piutang (cessie) kepada pihak ketiga menurut Pasal 613 KUH Perdata. Lex Administratum, 4(5). https://www.neliti.com/publications/156219/analisis-hukum-pengalihan-piutang-cessie-kepada-pihak-ketiga-menurut-pasal-613-k

Yusmita, Y., Ariyanti, R. P., Njoto, E. D. P., & Yudistira, R. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap debitur dan kreditur dalam melakukan perjanjian baku. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2265

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Juliman, & Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Debitur Kredit Macet Akibat Praktek Cessie dalam Perjanjian Perbankan. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 6(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v6i2.16374