Analisis Kedudukan Hukum Lie Detector dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana

Authors

  • Hatarto Pakpahan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • George Renjaan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

Keywords:

Lie Detector, Evidence/Proof, Premeditated Murder

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal standing of using a lie detector in the settlement of the premeditated murder case committed by Jesika Kumala Wongso against I Wayan Mirna Salihin, and to determine the implementation of applying the lie detector in the premeditated murder criminal case. The type of legal research used in this study is normative legal research, and the method of addressing the problem uses the statutory approach and the case approach. The research results show that the legal standing of using the Lie Detector constitutes valid evidence as referred to in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely expert testimony. This is because the results of the examination using the Lie Detector method are then printed out and explained again by an expert who possesses the necessary capability. Therefore, the position of the lie detector in the evidentiary process of the criminal case in Supreme Court Decision Number 498K/PID/2017 is as a complement to the decision-making process, as the judge's conviction was already obtained based on evidence with high probative value, and the Supreme Court judge upheld the decisions of the first-instance and appellate courts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfitra. (2011). Hukum pembuktian dalam beracara pidana, perdata, dan korupsi di Indonesia. http://katalog.pustaka.unand.ac.id//index.php?p=show_detail&id=96189

Ardiani, C. F., Dewi, E. P., & Puspita, A. D. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Dan Korban Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SULTAN ADAM Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(2), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.71456/sultan.v3i2.1553

Dickson, P., Manuputty, M., & Ginting, Y. P. (2025). Kekuatan Pembuktian Percakapan Digital sebagai Alat Bukti yang Tidak Diatur dalam KUHAP. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(03), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v4i03.2727

Fardhinand, H. A. (2015). Eksistensi Tes Dna (Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Pidana. Lex Crimen, 4(2), 3279. https://www.neliti.com/publications/3279/eksistensi-tes-dna-deoxyribo-nucleic-acid-sebagai-alat-bukti-dalam-pembuktian-hu

Firmansyah, R. A., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Administratif Terhadap Korporasi Atas Pencemaran Limbah B3 Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humaniora Dan Politik, 6(1), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6517

Ginting, Y. P., Nararya, J. R. P., Rumampuk, A. J., Chandra, S. I., Ginting, H. O., Anthony, J. M., Napitu, O. P., & Ratrisari, E. P. (2025). Kekuatan Hukum Rekaman Komunikasi sebagai Alat Bukti Tanpa Saksi Fisik dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia: Studi Kasus Papa Minta Saham. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(03), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v4i03.2773

Kristanto, A. K., Paka, A. P. E., Lauren, C., Rajagukguk, J. P., Silalahi, J. B. I., Silalahi, T. R. I., Manalu, V. E., & Ginting, Y. P. (2025). Signifikansi Pengakuan Tertulis Saksi sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Putusan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(03), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v4i03.2772

Maukar, M. R., Huberta, G. A., Fewsan, K., Bintang, A., Michelin, D., Maukar, M. R., Huberta, G. A., Fewsan, K., Bintang, A., & Michelin, D. (2025). Tinjauan Kritis Hukum Pembuktian dalam Yurisdiksi Militer : Analisis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 29-K/PM.III-14/AD/IX/2025). Jurnal Sosial Dan Sains, 5(11), 7760–7768. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsosains.v5i11.32580

Mulyadi, L. (2015). Asas Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dihubungkan Dengan Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Anti Korupsi 2003. JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERADILAN, 4(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.1.2015.101-132

Pieter, S., & Silambi, E. D. (2019). Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v3i1.1940

Putra, A. W., Rozah, U., & Baskoro, B. D. (2017). Kajian Tentang Penggunaan Keterangan Ahli Hukum Pidana Dalam Praktik Pembuktian Perkara Pidana. Scientific Repository (Petra Christian University). http://eprints.undip.ac.id/74547/

Putriana, A. (2025). Kualitas pembuktian dalam penuntutan tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana pada kasus kopi sianida (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 777/PId.B/2016/PN.Jkt.Pst). Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani, 15(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v15i2.12363

Rohman, R., Muliadi, M., Pratama, F., Saputra, I., Firmansyah, A., Marwan, T., & Irfandi, I. (2024). Sistem Pembuktian dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Tantangan dalam Proses Peradilan. Jimmi Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.146

Sianipar, P. A., & Esther, J. (2025). Peran Advokat dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Pemerasan di Media Sosial. Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani, 15(2), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v15i2.13093

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Hatarto Pakpahan, & George Renjaan. (2025). Analisis Kedudukan Hukum Lie Detector dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 6(2), 159–167. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/mlj/article/view/16395

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): November,2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is applied when mandated by research funders, such as those who have signed. Open Access articles in MLJ Merdeka Law Journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.