Kajian Yuridis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst tentang Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Proses Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia
Keywords:
Electronic Evidence, Legal Certainty , Legal Proof, Corruption CrimesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the legal basis for judges' considerations in accepting and assessing electronic evidence in Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst and evaluate its compliance with the principle of legal certainty in criminal evidence. Using normative legal methods based on evidentiary theory, legal certainty theory, and legal system theory, this study examines the process of accepting electronic evidence in court. The results indicate that judges prioritize the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of electronic evidence, such as emails, conversation recordings, and transaction data, which have undergone digital forensic examination to ensure the absence of manipulation. Judges also refer to the provisions of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and jurisprudence that recognizes electronic evidence as valid evidence. These considerations reflect the principle of legal certainty because the process of accepting evidence is carried out in accordance with applicable procedures and legal frameworks. However, this study emphasizes the importance of strengthening regulations and technical standards so that the mechanism for accepting electronic evidence can be implemented more consistently and standardized throughout the Indonesian judicial system.
Downloads
References
Asaad, A. F. (2023). Efektivitas hukum alat bukti elektronik dalam pemeriksaan bukti di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 6(1), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6267
Asnawi, E., & Libra, R. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Pembuktian Informasi Dan Dokumen Elektronik Pada Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 1(1), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.55292/s7qpcn77
Astaman, A., Renggong, R., & Oner, B. (2023). Tindakan Penyelidikan Kepolisian Terhadap Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Terkait Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 6(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i1.3834
Awaluddin, F., Amsori, N., & Mulyana, M. (2024). Tantangan dan Peran Digital Forensik dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan di Ranah Digital. HUMANIORUM, 2(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.37010/hmr.v2i1.35
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK). (2020). Laporan Pemeriksaan Keuangan 2020
Catur, R. (2023). Comparison of legal system related to implementation of cyber notary in Indonesia with common law and civil law system. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v6i1.7108
Farhan, F. (2021). Tantangan dalam Pemanfaatan Alat Bukti Elektronik di Pengadilan. Jurnal Peradilan, Vol. 4, No. 3.
Kartika, P. P. (2019). Data elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah dalam pembuktian tindak pidana pencucian uang. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.146
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). (2020). Laporan Tahunan 2020
Koesnoe, Mohammad. (2012). Hukum Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Meidiansyah, G. (2017). Relevansi Pembinaan Dalam Lapas Terhadap Terpidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Penjeraan Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pemasyarakatan. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/28484/
Misran, M., & Royanti, D. (2021). Teori Gabungan Hukuman Dalam Hukum Positif Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam. Legitimasi Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 9(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v9i2.8514
Nurjanah, N. T., Azizah, N. S., Daputra, N. D. R., & Putra, N. T. H. (2025). Relevansi Prinsip Sahnya Perjanjian Dalam Kuhperdata Terhadap Transaksi Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce). LAWYER Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.58738/lawyer.v3i1.716
Pohan, S. (2021). Tinjauan Normatif Tentang Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Elektronik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v8i2.380-391
Prawira, S. (2017). Upaya Penyadapan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Syiah Kuala University), 1(1). http://etd.unsyiah.ac.id//index.php?p=show_detail&id=30647
Ramiyanto, R. (2017). Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERADILAN, 6(3), 463. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.463-484
Sekarsari, R. M. (2019). Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Hasil Penyadapan Dalam Rencana Penjebakan Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum. Jurist-Diction, 1(2), 705. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v1i2.11019
Wicaksono, A. D. (2014). Peran dokumen elektronik sebagai alat bukti pada sistem pembuktian tindak pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 35260. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/789
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: MLJ Merdeka Law Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is applied when mandated by research funders, such as those who have signed. Open Access articles in MLJ Merdeka Law Journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
