Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kelompok Kriminal Separatis Bersenjata (Studi Kasus Organisasi papua Merdeka)

Ferdinand Sulteng, Setiyono Setiyono

Abstract


The many years of conflict that occurred in Papua and Aceh in the past, must be seen epistemologically every incident that occurred in the area. There is a common thread in every conflict that occurs there, whether involving separatist movements or purely because of the dissatisfaction of the Papuan people due to legal products in the form of government policies and decisions issued for the area. It is not without reason that someone acts as a separatist against the state, as well as before the territory is declared out of the country, then legally all the people in the area still have rights that must be protected by the state. This means that before Papua leaves the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, Papuans and separatists who live there are still Indonesian citizens and have the right to have their rights protected for Indonesia. The problems that will be investigated in this research are the Criminal Law Policy Against the Actors of the Armed Separatist Criminal Group and how is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of the Armed Separatist Criminal Group in Indonesia


Keywords


Accountability, Policy. Separatism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmady, L. (2020). “Kekhususan” Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Dinamis, 17(1), 81.

Alam, S. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Konsep Makar Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Islam. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 26(2), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v26i2.7803

Anakotta, M. Y. (2021). The Criminal Acts by Armed Criminal Group in Papua, “Treason” or “Terrorism”? Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 7(2), 387–402.

Arief, B.N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Konsep KUHP Baru, Cetakan Ke-1. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Groub

Aripkah, N., Soponyono, E., & Putra, A. W. (2020). People’s Power Policy in Legal Construction in Treason Criminal Law as Indonesian Penal Code Reform. Unram Law Review, 4(2), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i2.116

Chazawi, A. (2002). Kejahatan Terhadap Keamanan Dan Keselamatan Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia Sebuah Studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya Penangannya oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi. Surabaya: Peradaban.

Hamzah. A. (2016). Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten di Dalam KUHP). Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Hartati, A. Y. (2010). Separatisme Dalam Konteks Global (Studi Tentang Eksistensi Republik Maluku Selatan (RMS) Sebagai Gerakan Separatis Indonesia). Spektrum, 7(2), 1–10.

Hiariej, E.O.S., (2018). Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka

Imam, R., Hafis, A., & Riau, U. I. (2019). Desentralisasi Asimetris: Kemiskinan Ditengah Kelimpahan Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 1180–1192.

Kaisupy, D. A., & Maing, S. G. (2021). Proses Negosiasi Konflik Papua: Dialog Jakarta-Papua. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(1), 82–98.

Lukman, S. A. (2016). Tindak Pidana Makar Terhadap Keutuhan Wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Pasal 87 KUHP (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Gerakan Riau Merdeka Tahun 1999). JOM Fakultas Hukum, 3(2).

Luqman, L. (1993). Delik Politik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ind-Hill

Malak, S. (2012). Otonomi Khusus Papua. In Ar-raafi. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301348375_Otonomi_Khusus_Papua

Melani, M., Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2020). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dibidang Transaksi Elektronik Sebagai Tindak Pidana Non-Konvensional. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 15(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.19469

Moeljatno. (2009). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara

Muladi, D.P. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta : Kencana

Mulia, K. D. A., Afrizal, M. S., & Hadi, L. D. (2020). Pertangungjawaban Pidana Anggota Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM) Sebagai Pelaku Makar. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 330–345. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/4372

Muttaqin, A. (2013). Otonomi Khusus Papua Sebuah Upaya Merespon Konflik Dan Aspirasi Kemerdekaan Papua. POLITIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika,4,1,5-18

Panjaitan, L. S., Syahrin, A., Marlina, & Leviza, J. (2016). Penerapan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Makar Oleh Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM) Di Kabupaten Jayawijaya (Studi Putusan Nomor 38/Pid.B/2011/PN.Wmn). USU Law Journal, 4(3), 88–98.

Permana, F. H., Soponyono, E., & Sularto, R. B. (2016). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 1–11.

Permono, P. (2019). Abu Sayyaf Group di Filipina Selatan setelah Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 13(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.13.2.2019.109-122

Prabowo, P. A., Supriyono, B., Muluk, M. R. K., & Noor, I. (2020). The Implementation of the Special Autonomy of Papua Province From The Aspect of Improveing Public Services. Jurnal Pertahanan, 6(1), 59–74.

Rianto A. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum. Jakarta: Graniat

Sianturi, B. H., & Hanita, M. (2020). Optimalisasi Peran Polri Dalam Penanganan Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata di Papua. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 6(1), 73–94.

Sunggono, B. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja.

Situmorang, Y. K., Yuliati, Y., & Aprilianda, N. (2019). Kriminalisasi Kelalaian Dalam Perbuatan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia. Al -Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 5(1).

Sudarto. (1981). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni

Suwarsono, S. (2017). Perbuatan Makar Menurut Pasar 107 Kitab Undang-Undang Pidana. Lex Privatum, V(9).

Thomas, C. G., & Falola, T. (2020). Secession and Separatist Conflicts in Postcolonial Africa. In Secession and Separatist Conflicts in Postcolonial Africa. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdxf0

Tryatmoko, W. M. (2016). Politik Kebijakan Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(1), 18.

Ubayanto, T., Sudarsono, S., Permadi, I., & Widagdo, S. (2020). Legal Implications of the Arrangement of Authority of the Indonesian National Army in Overcoming the Armed Separatist Movement, Armed Insurgency and Terrorism. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 9(5), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.18533/JOURNAL.V9I5.1913

Wiratraman, H. P. (2021). Rasisme dan Penerapan Pasal Makar terhadap Kebebasan Ekspresi Politik Papua. In Undang: Jurnal Hukum (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.49-80




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i1.6668

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 MLJ Merdeka Law Journal




MLJ Merdeka Law Journal

Postgraduate - University of Merdeka Malang

Postgraduate Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64
Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65146.



View My Stats

Other Link

Follow Us

mlj@unmer.ac.id

Phone (0341) 580161
Faks (0341) 588395

bhouhttp://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/mlj/


MLJ Merdeka Law Journal  Creative Commons License  This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.