A Conceptual Framework of Investigative Audit Quality Indicators to Evaluate Implementation by Audit Firm
Abstract
This research aimed to evaluate the implementation of investigative audits conducted by audit firm using the investigative audit quality indicators (IAQIs). The research was based on several phenomena, including the role and reputation of public accountants in conducting investigative audits and the implementation of new investigative audit standards by the Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). The mixed sequential explanatory method was used to analyze qualitative and quantitative data. This study produced six elements in a conceptual framework of investigative audit quality and 70 factors which became IAQIs, while from the results of the evaluation of the application of investigative audit quality indicators, KAP X fulfilled 66 indicators out of 70 indicators set, KAP X has meet expectations theory inspired confidence and has carried out investigative audit implementation meet investigative service standards.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ACFE. (2020). Fraud Examiners Manual International Edition. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc (ACFE). https://www.acfe.com/-/media/images/acfe/products/publication/fraud-examiners-manual/2022_fem_toc.ashx
AE. (2022). Audit Quality Indicators: A global overview of initiatives, Factsheet. Accoutancy Europe (AE). https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/220401-Factsheet-Audit-Quality-Indicators.pdf
aktual.com. (2019, June 9). aktual.com. https://aktual.com/dugaan-malpraktek-kap-soewarno-bono-sujatmiko-dan-heri-santoso-digugat/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carolyn Lunsford Mears. (2009). Interviewing for education and social science research: The gateway approach. Palgrave Mcmilla.
Corne Oberholzer. (2002). Quality management in forensic accounting. Gordon Institute of Business Science.
Edward Bell, Alan Bryman, & Steven William Kleinknecht. (2023). Social_Research_Methods. Oxford University Press.
E.T, M., L, N., W, M., M. T, T., & D, M. (2020). An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Forensic Audit as a Tool for Fraud Detection and Prevention. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 10(2), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.102.49.67
FEE. (2016). Overview of Audit Quality Indicators Initiatives. The Federation of European Accountants (FEE).
Fossung, M. F., & Valery Verges, D. K. (2022). External Audit Quality and Value Creation: What Relationship in the Cameroonian Context. Open Journal of Accounting, 11(01), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2022.111002
FRC. (2008). Financial Reporting Council the Audit Quality Framework. Financial Reporting Council (FRC).
Handoyo, S., Riantika, R. L., & Hidayat, M. I. (2022). The Influence of Auditor’s Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on Audit Quality. AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review), 5(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v5i2.7808
Hanifah, I. A., & Clyde, V. (2022). The Effect of Whistlebowing System toward Fraud Prevention: Mediation of Forensic and Investigative Audit. AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review), 5(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v5i2.7530
Hidayati, A. N., Riadi, I., Ramadhani, E., & Al Amany, S. U. (2021). Development of conceptual framework for cyber fraud investigation. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 7(2).
IAASB. (2014). A Framework for Audit Quality Key Elements That Create An Environment For Audit Quality. International Federation of Accountant (IFAC).
IAASB. (2020). International Standard on Quality Management 1 (Previously International Standard on Quality Control 1). International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).
IAPI. (2018). Panduan Indikator Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).
IAPI. (2021a). Kerangka Untuk Perikatan Asurans. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).
IAPI. (2021b). Standar Jasa Investigasi. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).
ICAI. (2021). Audit Quality Maturity Model Version 1.0 (AQMM v1.0). The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI).
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
John W Creswell. (2021). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Kompas.com. (2022, June 6). Diambil kembali dari money.kompas.com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2022/06/02/200000226/studi-kroll--8-dari-10-perusahaan-di-ri-pernah-alami-kasus-penipuan-terbanyak?page=all.
Kristiana Durnila, & Cahyo Budi Santoso2. (2018). The Effect of Forensic Audits and Auditor Competencies on Fraud Prevention With Emotional Intelligence As Moderating Variables In Ri Bpk Provincial Representatives Of Riau Islands. Measurement: Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 87–102.
Kroll, & ACFE. (2022). Indonesia Fraud Risk Survey. https://www.kroll.com/-/media/kroll-images/pdfs/a-risky-blindspot-for-indonesia.pdf
Mahendro Sumardjo, Dewi Darmastuti, & Najmatuzzahrah. (2022). Do the Quality of Investigation Audit Influenced by Auditor Independ-ence and Professionalism? International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 6(2).
Muhammad Isnayanda. (2018). Perhitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi [Universitas Sumatera Utara]. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/6925
Najmatuzzahrah, N., Mulyani, S., Winarningsih, S., & Akbar, B. (2020). The Significance of Management Culture on Investigative Audit Quality. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.22
NBA. (2018). The Crux of The Matter Compass for Audit Quality. Royal Netherlands Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA).
new.detik.com. (2019, December 28). new.detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4838846/tanggapan-kantor-akuntan-publik-soewarno-atas-gugatan-karen-agustiawan/2
Sumarto, S., & Rahadian, Y. (2020). Evaluasi Penerapan Metode Penghitungan Kerugian Negara Dalam Membantu Penanganan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 12(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v12i1.23866
Suratno, Syahril Djaddang, Shinta Budi Astuti, & Bambang Supriatno. (2016). The Role of Self Efficacy of The Professionalism of Accountants, Auditors Individual Cultural Relations with Government Quality Investigative Audit (Study on Auditor BPK Government in Jakarta). International Conference on Education For Economics, Business, and Finance (ICEEBF) .
Susanto, H., Mulyani, S., Sukmadilaga, C., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Sustaining Investigative Audit Quality through Auditor Competency and Digital Forensic Support: A Consensus Study. Sustainability, 14(22), 15141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215141
Theodorus M. Tuanakotta. (2018). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif Edisi 2 (2nd ed.). Salemba Empat.
Wennie Cyntia. (2022). Atribut Kualitas Audit Dalam Proses IPO Pada KAP XYZ. Universitas Indonesia.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
William Ellet. (2018). The Case Study Hand Book a Student’s Guide. Harvard University Press
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v6i2.10305
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review) Postgraduate - University of Merdeka Malang Postgraduate Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64 | Other Link | Follow Us | |||||
Site Home Journal Unmer Malang Postgraduate LPPM Library Repository |
|
AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |