ESG, environmental innovation, and corporate profitability: Evidence of direct and lagged effects from Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v9i2.16932Keywords:
Corporate profitability, Emerging markets, Environmental innovation, ESG performance, Mediation analysis, SustainabilityAbstract
This study investigates whether environmental innovation serves as a mechanism through which ESG performance influences corporate profitability in an emerging market context. While prior studies showed a direct association between ESG and firm performance, evidence on the mediating role of environmental innovation remains limited, particularly in Indonesia. Using panel data from all non-financial firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2012-2023, this study employs fixed-effects regression, mediation analysis, and lagged-effect testing. ESG performance is measured by ESG scores, environmental innovation is proxied by environmental innovation scores, and profitability is assessed using return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). The results indicate that ESG performance positively affects both environmental innovation and profitability. Environmental innovation significantly improves ROE and shows a weaker contemporaneous effect on ROA, while lagged analyses show positive impacts on both profitability measures. The findings extend the ESG-performance literature by demonstrating that environmental innovation acts as a transmission mechanism through which ESG performance generates financial benefits over time in an emerging market setting. For managers and policymakers, the results underscore the importance of aligning ESG initiatives with environmental innovation strategies and supportive regulatory incentives to enhance long-term profitability and sustainable value creation.
Downloads
References
Akuma, J. K., Akude, D. N., Kwaning, E., & Amoah-Ahinful, I. K. (2025). Green innovation and the profitability of manufacturing firms: The moderating role of intelligence generation. International Review of Management and Marketing, 15(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17646
Albitar, K., Al-Shaer, H., & Liu, Y. S. (2023). Corporate commitment to climate change: The effect of eco-innovation and climate governance. Research Policy, 52(2), 104697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104697
Ali, N. B. M., Ali Hussin, H. A. A., Mohammed, H. M. F., Mohmmed, K. A. A. H., Almutiri, A. A. S., & Ali, M. A. (2025). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on the profitability of Saudi-listed firms: insights from Saudi Vision 2030. Sustainability, 17(7), 2977. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072977
Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
Batool, F., Alhidary, I. A., Boda, J. R., Alwadi, B. M., Khudoykulov, K., & Haseeb, M. (2025). Balancing sustainability and profitability: The financial effect of green innovation in Chinese high-pollution industries. Sustainability, 17(8), 3610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083610
Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Mendi, P. (2024). ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance. Eurasian Business Review, 14(1), 137-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00254-x
Cao, Z., Amrouche, N., & Pei, Z. (2025). Environmental innovation for competing firms: Key ESG dimension shaping strategies and profitability. Journal of Environmental Management, 392, 126716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126716
Cerciello, M., Busato, F., & Taddeo, S. (2023). The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 802-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2389
Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: the mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101
Clément, A., Robinot, É., & Trespeuch, L. (2022). Improving ESG scores with sustainability concepts. Sustainability, 14(20), 13154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013154
Dalal, K. K., & Thaker, N. (2019). ESG and corporate financial performance: A panel study of Indian companies. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 18(1), 44-59.
Đặng, R., Houanti, L. H., Reddy, K., & Simioni, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach. Economic Modelling, 90, 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.009
De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe. Sustainability, 12(13), 5317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135317
Doni, F., & Fiameni, M. (2024). Can innovation affect the relationship between environmental, social, and governance issues and financial performance? Empirical evidence from the STOXX200 index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 546-574. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3500
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
Falk, C. F., & Biesanz, J. C. (2016). Two cross-platform programs for inferences and interval estimation about indirect effects in mediational models. Sage Open, 6(1), 2158244015625445. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015625445
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & environment, 27(4), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614535786
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2025). DSK IAI Sahkan Standar Pengungkapan Keberlanjutan: PSPK 1 dan PSPK 2 [Internet]. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://web.iaiglobal.or.id/Berita-IAI/detail/dsk_iai_sahkan_standar_pengungkapan_keberlanjutan_pspk_1_dan_pspk_2#gsc.tab=0
Khalil, M. A., Khalil, R., & Khalil, M. K. (2024). Environmental, social and governance (ESG)-augmented investments in innovation and firms' value: A fixed-effects panel regression of Asian economies. China Finance Review International, 14(1), 76-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-05-2022-0067
Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2023). Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations?☆. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113393
Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111663
Liang, K., Cao, Z., Tang, S., Hu, C., & Zhang, M. (2025). Evaluating the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on green technology innovation: based on Chinese A-share listed companies. Sustainability, 17(3), 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031085
Limanseto, H. (2022). Menko Airlangga: Transisi energi harus dipastikan dapat berjalan adil, teratur, dan terjangkau - kementerian koordinator bidang perekonomian Republik Indonesia [Internet]. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from: https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/4496/menko-airlangga-transisi-energi-harus-dipastikan-dapat-berjalan-adil-teratur-dan-terjangkau
Oktadewi, A. M. A., & Diantini, N. N. A. (2025). ESG and firm value: The moderating role of environmental performance and profitability in Indonesia’s mining sector. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 12(4), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v12n4.2536
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2017). Retrieved from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/129651/peraturan-ojk-no-51pojk032017-tahun-2017
Pörtner, H.-O., Scholes, R. J., Arneth, A., Barnes, D. K. A., Burrows, M. T., Diamond, S. E., Duarte, C. M., Kiessling, W., Leadley, P., Managi, S., McElwee, P., Midgley, G., Ngo, H. T., Obura, D., Pascual, U., Sankaran, M., Shin, Y. J., & Val, A. L. (2023). Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science, 380(6642), eabl4881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4881
Pristiandaru, D. L. (2024). RI masuk 10 besar negara penghasil emisi sepanjang 2023 [Internet]. Kompas. Retrieved from: https://lestari.kompas.com/read/2024/06/25/170000786/ri-masuk-10-besar-negara-penghasil-emisi-sepanjang-2023
Ramadhana, L. A., & Effendi, S. (2025). The effect of ESG and green innovation on the financial performance of listed firms. Research of Finance and Banking, 3(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.58777/rfb.v3i1.357
Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
Sastroredjo, P. E., Ausloos, M., & Khrennikova, P. (2025). Eco-innovation and earnings management: Unveiling the moderating effects of financial constraints and opacity in FTSE all-share firms. Sustainability, 17(11), 4860. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114860
Sastroredjo, P. E., & Suganda, T. R. (2026). From ESG risk to financial strength: How controversy management and corporate governance shape resilience. Research in International Business and Finance, 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103438
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business. John Wiley & Sons.
Suganda, T. R., & Kim, J. (2023). An empirical study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and default risk: Evidence in Korea. Sustainability, 15(4), 3644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043644
Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 16/SEOJK.04/2021, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2021). Retrieved from: https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Bentuk-dan-Isi-Laporan-Tahunan--Emiten-atau-Perusahaan-Publik/SEOJK - 16 - 2021.pdf
Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
Tomeo, V., & Mastrostefano, V. (2024). Do innovating enterprises perform better? New evidence from frame SBS and CIS data integration. Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v78i3.394
Tripopsakul, S. (2025). ESG practices, green innovation, and financial performance: Panel evidence from ASEAN firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080467
Wu, L., Yi, X., Hu, K., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2025). The effect of ESG performance on corporate green innovation. Business Process Management Journal, 31(8), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-04-2023-0237
Zhu, F., Xu, X., & Sun, J. (2024). The short board effect of ESG rating and corporate green innovation activities. Plos One, 19(3), e0299795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299795
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
