Menalar Posisi Elit Daerah di Era Demokrasi dan Otonomi Daerah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v3i1.1989Keywords:
Local Democracy, Regional Autonomy, Local EliteAbstract
Amid the diverse capacities of local governments in exercising their authority in the era of democracy and regional autonomy, local elites have emerged in the regions. The consequences of the emergence of local elites in the region then gave rise to obstacles in democracy, such as political dynasties as well as conflicts related to control of resources, while the rotational dimensions of power and the welfare of the community began to be marginalized. This can be seen from the strengthening of local strongmen and local bossism. This certainly makes the paradigm confusion associated with local elites and local conflicts that occur in the local post-democratic and regional autonomy regions. As it is known that when the regions have not implemented local autonomy and democracy, what happens is that local elites tend to derivate from national politics so that in the event of local conflict the resolution of the conflict can be more easily resolved. Therefore, it is necessary to return to reasoning to redefine the position of the local elite as a central representation as well as a representation of the local community. This research is qualitative using desk-research. The results show that with local democracy and regional autonomy the spread of political forces makes the formation of local elites that are formed today is centrifugal.
Downloads
References
Higley, J. (2010). Elite Theory and Elites. In K. T. Leicht, & J. C. Jenkins, Handbook of Global Politics. New York: Springer.
Kingsley, T. (1996). Perspective on Devolution. Journal of The American Planning Association Volume 62, No.4 .
Koirudin. (2005). Sketsa Kebijakan Desentralisasi di Indonesia: Format Masa Depan Otonomi Menuju Kemandirian Daerah. Malang: Averroes Press.
Koswara. (2000). Makna Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan - Masyarakat Ilmu Pemerintahan Indonesia (MIPI).
Mawhood, P. (1987). Local Government in the Third World. John Wiley and Son.
Migdal, J. &. (2005). Rethinking the State. In K. Schlichte, The dynamics of state: the formation and crises of the state domination. Burlington: Ashgate.
Mills, C. W. (2000). The Power Elite. Oxford University Press.
Mosca, G. (1939). The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw - Hill.
Pareto, V. (1935). The Mind and Society: A Treatise On General Sociology . New York: Dover.
Sidel, J. T. (2005). Bosisme dan Demokrasi di Filipina, Thailand dan Indonesia; Menuju Kerangka Analisis Baru Tentang Orang Kuat Lokal. In J. Harriss, Politisasi Demokrasi Politik Lokal Baru. Jakarta: Demos.
Sidel, J. T. (1999). Capital, Coercion, and Crime: Bossism in The Philippines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Syaukani, H., Gaffar, A., & Rasyid, R. (2002). Otonomi Daerah dalam Negara Kesatuan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
- Publisher of Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik University of Merdeka Malang.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution and share a like License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share and copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adaptative remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.