Responsive public complaint service innovation:The JAKI Application case in DKI Provincial Government

Deasy Ernawati, Raden Dwiarto, Yulia Nurul Aini, Asropi Asropi, Noviana Dwi Harsiwi

Abstract


JAKLAPOR is one of the features in the DKI Provincial Government’s JAKIapplication, which serves as the official complaint channel for DKI residents.The public has lodged complaints after using the JAKI application. However,there are numerous flaws in the JAKI application that can impede public use ofthe JAKLAPOR feature. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the level ofpublic satisfaction with the JAKLAPOR feature. This study employs a mixedmethods approach with an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. Thequantitative and qualitative methods are used sequentially in this design toproduce a comprehensive study on community satisfaction with theJAKLAPOR feature. The study’s findings indicate that the community is pleasedwith the JAKLAPOR feature as a channel for public complaints. In this case,the informant felt that the UPTD responded quickly enough to public com-plaints reported through JAKLAPOR. Rapid response accompanied by rea-sonably good completion quality. However, JAKPLAPOR service improvementmust be continuous, including more intensive public outreach about the exist-ence of the JAKLAPOR feature in the JAKI application.  

Keywords


Community complaints, JAKI, JAKLAPOR, Smart city

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrizal, A. M. R. (2020). Komunikasi Humas Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta dalam menangani pengelolaan aduan masyarakat pada Aplikasi JAKI. Universitas Satya Negara Indonesia.

Az Zahro, S. R., Nurjanah, N., & Mutmainah, N. (2022). Penerapan e-government melalui sectoral protocol system guna mewujudkan good governance di Indonesia. Jurist-Diction, 5(1), 341. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i1.32871

Bazarah, J., Jubaidi, A., & Hubaib, D. F. (2021). Konsep pelayanan publik di Indonesia (Analisis literasi penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik di Indonesia). Dedikasi, 22, 105–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v22i2.5860

Bertucci, M. G. (2007). Civic engagement in public policies: A Toolkit. https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs/E-Library%20Archives/2007%20Civic%20Engagement%20in%20Public%20Policies%20Toolkit.pdf

Calzada, I. (2020). Democratising smart cities? Penta-helix multistakeholder social innovation framework. Smart Cities, 3, 1145–1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040057

Chen, J., Walker, R., & Sawhney, M. (2019). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874

Cinar, E., Simms, C., Trott, P., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2022). Public sector innovation in context: A comparative study of innovation types. Public Management Review, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2080860

Creswell. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mix approaches (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Elgohary, E. (2017). E-government Implementation in Developing Countries: A Literature Review. International Journal of Computer and Technology, 16(1), 7510–7524. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v16i1.8371

European Commission. (2022). Smart cities: Cities using technological solutions to improve the management and efficiency of the urban environment. https://commission.europa.eu/eu-regional-and-urban-development/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en

Hardiyansyah. (2018). Kualitas pelayanan publik: Konsep, dimensi, indikator dan implementasinya. Gava Media. Yogyakarta.

Harijanti, S. D. (2020). Complaint handling systems in the public sector: A comparative analysis between Indonesia and Australia. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v3i1.11454

Insani, P. A. (2017). Mewujudkan kota responsif melalui smart city. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v2i1.1423

Kombate, B., Emmanuel, M., & Richard, K. K. (2021). The implication of the strategic implementation style and middle management effort in public organization strategic management implementation and its organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration and

Governance, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i1.18150

Korac, S., Saliterer, I., & Walker, R. (2016). Analysing the environmental antecedents of innovation adoption among politicians and public managers. Public Management Review, 19, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200119

Magalhães, T., Andion, C., & Manoel, A. A. (2022). Collaborative research, public inquiry, and democratic experimentalism: Contributions and how to apply pragmatism to social innovation studies: Revue Canadienne de Recherche sur les OSBL et l’Économie Sociale (ANSERJ). Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 13, 71–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser543

Mahendradi, R., & Warsono, H. (2020). Peningkatan kapasitas Aplikasi Mobile “Magelang Cerdas” dalam rangka peningkatan pelayanan publik. Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance, 2(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.31002/jpalg.v4i1.23948

Mohanty, S. (2016). Everything you wanted to know about smart cities. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879

Nugraha, Y. (2020). Paparan pengelolaan pengaduan pelayanan publik. Pemprov DKI Jakarta. Jakarta.

Nuutinen, M., Kaasinen, E., Hyvärinen, J., Mölsä, A., & Siltanen, S. (2021). Making a building smart with a co-created and continuously evolving enjoyable service entity—insights from a collaborative study. Smart Cities, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010001

Ombudsman. (2021, June 4). Tingkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik, ombudsman kembali gelar penilaian kepatuhan. https://ombudsman.go.id/news/r/tingkatkan-kualitas-pelayanan-publik-ombudsman-kembali-gelar-penilaian-kepatuhan

Osborne, S. P. (2012). The third sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges. Routledge. E-Book.

Prabujaya, S. P., & Santoso, A. D. (2021). Public sector innovation on Covid-19 in South Sumatra: Calling for a more sustainable innovation. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 18(2), 251-263.

Ratminto, & Winarsih, A. S. (2012). Manajemen pelayanan: Pengembangan model konseptual, penerapan citizen's charter dan standar pelayanan minimal. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Rudi, A. (2014, December 16). Seperti apa cara kerja “Jakarta Smart City”? R https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2014/12/16/08245031/Seperti.Apa.Cara.Kerja.Jakarta.Smart.City.

Sinambela, L. P., & Sinambela, S. (2019). Manajemen kinerja pengelolaan, pengukuran, dan implikasi kinerja. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Said, A. (2022). Perceived public service quality and accessibility for Regional Index Development: The case of City of Mojokerto-Indonesia. HABITAT, 33(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2022.033.1.5

Sikora-Fernandez, D., & Stawasz, D. (2016). The concept of smart city in the theory and practice of urban development management. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 10, 86–99.

Soule, S. A. (2012). Social movements and markets, industries, and firms. Organization Studies, 33(12), 1715–1733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612464610

Syalianda, S. I., & Kusumastuti, R. D. (2021). Implementation of smart city concept: A case of Jakarta Smart City, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012128

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. (Second Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc. E-book.

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001

Windrum, P., & Koch, P. M. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Edward Elgar Publishing. E-book.

Yuhefizar, Huda, A., Gunawan, I., & Hariyanto, E. (2017). Naskah akademik dan rancangan Peraturan Daerah tentang Pengelolaan E-Goverment di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. https://ppid.sumbarprov.go.id/home/news/4-naskah-akademik-dan-rancangan-peraturan-daerah-tentang-pengelolaan-e-goverment-di-provinsi-sumatera-.html

Zeithaml, V. A., Verleye, K., Hatak, I., Koller, M., & Zauner, A. (2020). Three decades of customer value research: Paradigmatic roots and future research avenues. Journal of Service Research, 23(4), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520948134




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v8i1.9136

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.