A conceptual study on the use of space for domestic activities and productive activities in household-based businesses

Pindo Tutuko

doi:10.26905/jp.v17i2.7005

A conceptual study on the use of space for domestic activities and productive activities in household-based businesses

Pindo Tutuko

Abstract

The strength of tradition supports the stability of the elements from one generation to another. This shows that from one community group there is a tradition in which every element of the tradition will be passed down to the next generation. The house is not just a place to shelter, rest, and have a family, but it can also function to mobilize the residents' resources by looking at the opportunities that exist. In general, the concept of home and work includes social and cultural dimensions, namely as a house that is used as a place to live without other meaningful activities, and a production house, namely a house that is partly used for productive or economic activities. There is a use of space that should be mostly for residential needs (domestic) into activities for doing business (productive). Household Based Enterprises (UBR) in Kampung Sanan "Tempe' Malang, experienced a change in the pattern of occupancy which was influenced by the part of the house that was important to their business.

Keywords

Domestic activities, Productive activities, Use of space, Household-based businesses

Full Text:

PDF

References

Creighton, T. H., & Ford, K. M. Ed. (1961) Contemporary houses, evaluated by their owners. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.

Habraken, N. J. (1978). The systematic design of support. Massachusetts: Laboratory of Arch and Planning MIT, Cambridge.

Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: the role of behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York.

Laquian, A. A. (1993). Basic housing policy for urban sites. Service and shelter in developing countries, IDRC.

Lipton, M. (1980). Family, fungibility, and formality: rural advantages of informal non-farm enterprise versus the urban-formal state.

Molelong, L. (2000). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture: Foundation of Cultural Geography Series. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Rapoport, A. (1977). Urban aspect of urban form. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Santoso, H. B. (1955). Pembuatan tempe & tahu kedelai. bahan makanan bergizi tinggi. Jakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Sarwono, S.W. (1992). Psikologi Lingkungan; PPs Program Studi Psikologi Universitas Indonesia dan PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Jakarta.

Silas, J. (2000). Rumah produktif, dalam dimensi tradisional dan pemberdayaan. Laboratorium Perumahan dan Permukiman Jurusan FTSP ITS, UPT Penerbitan ITS. Edisi Pertama. Surabaya.

Soemarwoto, O. (1991). Ekologi lingkungan hidup dan pembangunan. Cetakan-5. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.

Subadyo, A. T. (2000). Tata ruang dan lingkungan, perspektif hubungan aktivitas manusia dan lingkungannya dalam penataan ruang. Studi Ilmu Lingkungan dan Bentang Alam Universitas Merdeka Malang.

Surakhmad, W., 1980, Pengantar penelitian ilmiah, dasar metode teknik. Edisi ke-7. Bandung: Penerbit Tarsito.

Suryabrata, S. (2002). Metodologi penelitian. Cetakan ke-13. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Turner, J. F. C. (1972). Freedom to build. The Macmillan Company.

Turner, J. F. C. (1976). Housing by people: towards autonomy in building environments. New York: Pantheon Books.

Waterson, R. (1998). The living house, the anthropology of architecture in South East Asia. Chapter: Kinship and 'house societies'. by Book News, Inc., Portland.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jp.v17i2.7005