Use of Accurate V3 software as an introduction to accounting skills in “Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka” Program

Retna Safriliana; Diyah Sukanti Cahyaningsih; Parawiyati Parawiyati

doi:10.26905/jp.v18i2.7055

Use of Accurate V3 software as an introduction to accounting skills in “Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka” Program

Retna Safriliana, Diyah Sukanti Cahyaningsih, Parawiyati Parawiyati

Abstract

In supporting the student exchange program at the national Program "Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka" (MBKM), the department needs to prepare courses that can be superior to be offered to students. In the Accounting Department University of Merdeka Malang, there are accounting practicum courses. This course provides students with skills in utilizing accounting software. This study wants to see the technology acceptance model for using Accurate Accounting V3 software for cross-departmental students who are the object of research in an experimental class. Data was obtained by distributing questionnaires to class participants who had completed the practicum. By using path analysis, the results show that perceived usefulness and perceived convenience affect user behavior interest. Perceived usefulness and interest in user behavior affect software to use, while perceived ease of use does not affect software usage decisions. Interest in user behavior is proven as an intervening variable on the effect of perceived usefulness on the use of the software.

Keywords

Actual system usage, Behavioral intention, Perceived ease of use, Perceived usefulness

Full Text:

PDF

References

Choi, G., & Chung, H. (2012). Elaborating the technology acceptance model with social pressure and social benefits for social networking sites (SNSs). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901376

Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments, and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37).

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Dewi, F. P. (2021). Analisis penerimaan software akuntansi accurate dengan pendekatan technology. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP), 7(2), 183–191.

Enu-Kwesi, F., & Opoku, M. O. (2020). Relevance of the technology acceptance model (TAM) in information management research: a review of selected empirical evidence. Pressacademia, 7(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2020.1186

Gögüs, C. G., & Özer, G. (2014). The Roles of technology acceptance model antecedents and switching cost on accounting software use. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 17(1), 1.

Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W. M., & Tam, K. Y. (2001). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045692

Irawan, I. (2018). Acceptance analysis of accounting software user through technology acceptance model. Jurnal Ilmiah ESAI, 9(1).

Kurniawan, R., & Diptyana, P. (2011). Telaah pemanfaatan software akuntansi oleh usaha kecil dan menengah. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 1(02), 107. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v1i02.324

Landry, B. J. L., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 87–99.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00103.x

Le, O. T. T., & Cao, Q. M. (2020). Examining the technology acceptance model using cloud-based accounting software of Vietnamese enterprises. Management Science Letters, 10(12), 2781–2788. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.032

Lee, H. H., & Chang, E. (2011). Consumer attitudes toward online mass customization: An application of extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01530.x

Lucyanda, J. (2015). Pengujian technology acceptance model (TAM) atas aplikasi internal software my quick accounting system (My QAS). Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(031), 8494830.

Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2005). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Advanced Topics in End User Computing, 4(January), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-474-3.ch006

Mullins, J. K., & Cronan, T. P. (2021). Enterprise systems knowledge, beliefs, and attitude: A model of informed technology acceptance. International Journal of Information Management, 59(December 2019), 102348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102348

Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructors’ acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x

Ratten, V. (2007). International consumer attitudes toward cloud computing: A social cognitive theory and technology acceptance model perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(5), 630–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie

Rukhmiati, N. M. S., & Budiartha, I. K. (2016). Informasi dan perceived usefulness pada kepuasan pengguna akhir software akuntansi (Studi empiris pada hotel berbintang di Provinsi Bali). Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana (Unud), Bali Akuntansi merupakan suatu sist. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana 5.1, 5(1), 115–142.

Rustiana. (2006). Studi model penerimaan teknologi (technology acceptance model) novice accountant. Kinerja, 10(1).

Song, M., Parry, M. E., & Kawakami, T. (2009). Incorporating network externalities into the technology acceptance model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00659.x

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3

Venkatesh, V. (2015). Technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom070047

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences Institute, 39(2), 273–315.

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & College, S. M. W. (2000). Theoretical acceptance extension model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Wahyuddin, W., & Afriani, M. (2018). Pengaruh penggunaan software akuntansi system application and product (sap) dan kualitas nilai informasi pelaporan keuangan terhadap kepuasan pengguna software akuntansi (Studi kasus pada PT. PLN (Persero) Kantor Wilayah Aceh-Kota Banda Aceh). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 6(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v6i2.1830

Widiyawati, S. F., & Wahjudi, E. (2021). Analisis determinasi pemanfaatan accurate online dengan menggunakan model UTAUT. Kompak : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 14(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v14i2.429

Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2010). Explaining internet banking behavior: Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, or technology acceptance model? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1172–1202.

Zeinora, Z., & Septariani, D. (2020). Analisis kelebihan dan kekurangan serta kebermanfaatan menggunakan software accurate, myob, zahir accounting dan penerapannya di Universitas Indraprasta PGRI. JABE: Journal of Applied Business and Economic, 6(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v6i4.4969

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/jp.v18i2.7055