About the Journal

Summary

Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang published by Institute for Research and Community Services (Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat - LPPM) the University of Merdeka Malang as the implementation of science, technology, economics, environment, and social in empowering the community.

Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang as part of the spirit of disseminating the results of community service. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang site provides journal articles for free download. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang is a national scientific journal which is a reference source for academics in the field of community service.

 

ISSN Number

Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Published by University of Merdeka Malang
| Print ISSN 2721-138X | Online ISSN 2548-7159 | DOI 10.26905 |

 


Editorial Policies

 

Focus and Scope

The journal aims to promote innovation and collaboration in addressing real-world challenges faced by communities across various sectors. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to:

  1. Community-Based Development
  2. Sustainable Livelihoods
  3. Education and Training
  4. Health and Well-Being
  5. Social Innovation
  6. Technology for Empowerment
  7. Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
  8. Partnership and Collaboration
  9. Cultural and Local Wisdom

 

Publication Frequency

Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, is a journal published by the Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) - University of Merdeka Malang four times a year in February, May, August, and November.

 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

 

Open Acces Policy

This journal is loyal to open access for academic work. All the original articles and review papers published in this journal are free to access immediately from the date of publication. We don’t charge any fees for any reader to download articles. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Plagiarism Policy

In the publication, the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang strongly opposes plagiarism on its own merits. The Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang is committed to blocking plagiarism, including self-plagiarism.

 

Authors must ensure that they have written the original work completely, and if the author has used the work and/or the words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and the author strongly advised. Also, an important part of the work has not been published. The author also respects the writing in the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang of publication, duplicate, or excessive fraud.

 

Before the author submits a script to the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang at least to first check the use of plagiarism. When submitting published articles for authenticity checks, the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang recommends the use of Turnitin, Scanner from http://turnitin.com/. Before using Plagiarism Turnitin for the first time, we strongly recommend that authors read the instructions for using this plagiarism detector. The detector plagiarism system for the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang uses and is affiliated with Turnitin.

Please note that the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang is affiliated with Turnitin.

 

The article has not been published in other media and does not contain plagiarism. Preferably the author should use reference management software, e.g Mendeley. The bibliography and reference system for the Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang uses Mendeley and Turnitin.

 

Copyright Notice


  Licensed

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
  2. Publisher of Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang is University of Merdeka Malang.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Peer Review Process

Every article submitted to the editor will be received first by the staff editor then selected the selection editor for the next stage. the next stage through the Initial Review process by the selection Editor. The selection editor will continue the article to the reviewer stage and sent it to the editorial board and the executive editor will follow the next selection of the Review Process stage. After that, the article of the review process will be sent to the selection editor to be received or returned to the author for revision. This process takes a month for a maximum time. In each manuscript, the editorial board and peer reviewers will be assessed from substantial and technical aspects.

All submitted manuscripts are read by editorial staff. the manuscript evaluated by the editor becomes incompatible with journal criteria rejected immediately without any external reviews. The manuscript evaluated to be a potential interest for our readers is sent to two reviewer desks. The editor then makes a decision based on reviewers' recommendations of several possibilities: rejected, revision required, or accepted. The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.

Review Process:

  1. The author submits the script
  2. Editor's Evaluation (some manuscripts denied or returned before the review process)
  3. Double-blind peer review process
  4. Editor's Decision
  5. Confirm to an author

 

Publication Ethics

Our ethical statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

We follow the Core Practices of COPE including the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Editors

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Duties for Editors

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Submission Fees: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are required to pay an Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.

Fast-Track Review: 750000.00 (IDR)
With the payment of this fee, the review, editorial decision, and author notification on this manuscript is guaranteed to take place within 4 weeks.

Publication Fees: 750000.00 (IDR)
If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs.

 

Indexing and Abstracting

Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang has been abstracting and indexing:

 

Journal History

  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang even indexed on Google Scholar starting in 2016.
  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang began to be indexed in the Garuda Portal from February 2020.
  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, from 2020 edition published three times a year (March, July, and November)
  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang is being evaluated by ICI World of Journals (Copernicus) in March 2020.
  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang is national accredited SINTA 4, SK Kemenristek/BRIN No. 148/M/KPT/2020 on September 16th, 2020.
  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, from 2021 edition published four times a year (February, May, August, and November)
  • ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang has been nationally accredited by the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of Indonesia by the letter 79/E/KPT/2023 on May 11, 2023. SINTA-3 Rating, from Volume 7 Issue 3, 2022 to Volume 12 Issue 2, 2027