Peningkatan Pembelajaran Student-Centered SMAK Santo Yusup Surabaya melalui Penataan Ruang Kelas

Lya Dewi Anggraini; Natalia Christiani; Hebert Adrianto

doi:10.26905/abdimas.v5i1.3100

Peningkatan Pembelajaran Student-Centered SMAK Santo Yusup Surabaya melalui Penataan Ruang Kelas

Lya Dewi Anggraini, Natalia Christiani, Hebert Adrianto

Abstract

One important factor in improving the quality of learning is the classroom atmosphere, which is formed through the activities carried out in it between the teacher and students with position, posture, and body language, as non-verbal communication, and the use of words, intonation, and pronunciation as verbal communication. Another important factor is the characteristics of the space where the activity takes place (setting). In applying the student-centered approach, which motivates students to learn more actively and not depend on the teacher, the role of a teacher is very important to always be able to improvise, exploit the potential and position, for the success of the teaching-learning process in schools. The purpose of activities in the field of interior science architecture community service at SMAK St. This framework is to strengthen the participation of teachers and students through the setting of learning spaces that support the establishment of communication as desired. The method used is observation of the physical environment and surveys of teachers and students about the communication experience and the convenience of learning on three subjects that are considered difficult, namely Chemistry, Biology, and English. The survey results show that effective verbal and non-verbal communication media between teachers and students and fellow students is triggered by the setting of the space outside the classroom, with more relaxed and enjoyable reasons, such as in a library room. This has a real impact on increasing student motivation in the form of subjects' likes and grades. Other results indicate an increase in teacher awareness that changes in varied learning space settings can support non-verbal communication with students.

How to cite:

Anggraeni, Lya Dewi. (2020). Peningkatan Pembelajaran Student-Centered SMAK Santo Yusup Surabaya melalui Penataan Ruang Kelas. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, 5(1),28-37.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v5i1.3100

Keywords

Classroom atmosphere; Communication media; Learning methods

Full Text:

PDF

References

Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2002). Educational Facilities. Victoria, Australia: The Images Publishing Group.

Arimbawa, W., & Santhyasa, I. K. G. (2010). Perspektif: Ruang sebagai entitas budaya lokal orientasi simbolik ruang masyarakat tradisional Desa Adat Penglipuran, Bangli-Bali. Local Wisdom: Jurnal Ilmiah Online, 2(4), 1-9

Boys, J. (2011). Towards Creative Learning Spaces: Re-Thinking the Architecture of Post-Compulsory Education. London and New York: Routledge.

Feige, A., Wallbaum, H., Janser, M., & Windlinger, L. (2013). Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupant's comfort and productivity. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(1), 7-3.

https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-01-2013-0004

Ford, A. (2007). Designing the Sustainable School. Australia: The Images Publishing Group Pty Ltd.

Habraken. N. J. (2000). The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment. USA: Graphic Composition.

Hameed, A., & Amjad, S. (2009). Impact of office design on employees’ productivity: A case study of banking organizations of Abbottabad, Pakistan. Journal of Public Affairs, Administration, and Management, 3(1) 1-13.

Haynes, B. (2008). The impact of office comfort on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960810847459

Idham, N. C. (2016). Arsitektur dan Kenyamanan Termal. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Laurens, J. M. (2004). Arsitektur dan Perilaku Manusia. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Ngalimun. (2017). Strategi Pembelajaran: Dilengkapi dengan 65 model pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Parama Ilmu.

Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture, Architecture, and Design. Chicago, Illinois: Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc.

Yudhistiro, K., Sumartono, Prasetya, D. A., Nurdewanto, B., & Sonalitha, E. (2019). Network education Sekolah Dasar Islam Mohammad Hatta Kota Malang. Jurnal Akses Pengabdian Indonesia, 4(2), 92-97.

Yunus, E. N., & Ernawati, E. (2018). Productivity paradox? The impact of office redesign on employee productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1918-1939 https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2017-0350

Yusup, I. R. (2016). Kesulitan guru pada pembelajaran Biologi tingkat Madrasah/ Sekolah di Provinsi Jawa Barat (Studi kasus wilayah Priangan Timur). Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v8i2.3187

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v5i1.3100