Assistance in integrity zone development for strengthening the public services quality at Sabo Technical Center

Eko Aristanto; Indri Damayanti; Sunarjo Sunarjo; Zaenal Aripin

doi:10.26905/abdimas.v7i2.7615

Assistance in integrity zone development for strengthening the public services quality at Sabo Technical Center

Eko Aristanto, Indri Damayanti, Sunarjo Sunarjo, Zaenal Aripin

Abstract

The development of the integrity zone (ZI) is an effort to maintain integrity as a state civil apparatus in carrying out public services for the community. This activity aims to assist and facilitate performance assessors of the integrity zone (ZI) implementation at the Sabo Technical Center. The implementation of the activity uses two methods, online by using Zoom Meetings and in-person meetings with tutors, technical assistance, and evaluation desks. Carried out effectively for six intermittent working days in September 2021, this activity is located at the Sabo Technical Center, Yogyakarta. The results of the initial evaluation of the implementation of the development of the integrity zone (ZI) on the leveraging component of strengthening public services, for each aspect that becomes the assessment indicator, includes the service standard rate of 85.33; service culture excellence rate of 88.26 and; service satisfaction assessment rate of 91.67. The impact of the implementation of this activity includes increasing implementation team understanding of various regulations that become the harborage of the development of the integrity zone (ZI); governance improvisation of integrity zone (ZI) development documents; improvise infrastructure facilities in public service rooms by meeting the minimum standards set; and presentation improvements on the website owned by the Sabo Technical Center.

Keywords

Assistance, Evaluation assessment, Integrity zone development

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References

Alfianto, A, Iswardoyo, J., & Sukatja, C. B. (2019). Efektifitas dan kelengkapan Bangunan Sabo di Sungai Togurara Daerah Gunung Api Gamalama. Jurnal Teknik Hidraulik, 1(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.32679/jth.v10i2.608

Aristanto, E., & Damayanti, I. (2021). Peningkatan kapasitas dan penilaian mandiri kinerja pelayanan publik. Jurnal Inovasi Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat (JIPEMAS), 4(1), 57-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.33474/jipemas.v4i1.7787

Aristanto, E., Damayanti, I., & Aripin, Z. (2021). Pelatihan dan pendampingan penyusunan kebijakan dan standar pelayanan publik pada Balai Teknik Air Minum. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, 6(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v6i2.5465

Hanafi, A. S. (2020). Pelaksanaan reformasi birokrasi dengan pembangunan zona integritas pada Kementerian Perindustrian. JIKAP (Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran), 4(1), 31-37.

Hasan, E. (2019). Membangun Smart Aparatur Sipil Negara Menuju Birokrasi Berkelas Dunia. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33701/jppdp.v12i1.934

Ibrahim, I. (2018). Implementasi kebijakan Diklatpim IV pola baru dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik di Pemerintah Provinsi Gorontalo. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(2), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v15i2.175

Jamaluddin, Y. (2016). Model peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik. Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 12(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v12i1.828

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat No. 16 Tahun 2020 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Unit Pelaksana Teknis di Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. https://jdih.pu.go.id/detail-dokumen/2814/1

Koeswara, H., & Liesmana, R. (2014). The analysis of public service expense policy in the regional budget. Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 21(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v21i1.4044

Munir, M. D. (2019). Bangunan Sabodam, fungsi dan potensinya sebagai bagian dari Geowisata Gunung Api Merapi. Jurnal Lingkungan dan Bencana Geologi, 10(2). 15–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.34126/jlbg.v10i2.202

Nurdin, I. (2019). Kualitas pelayanan publik: Perilaku aparatur dan komunikasi birokrasi dalam pelayanan publik). Penerbit Media Sahabat Cendekia.

Riani, N. K. (2021). Strategi peningkatan pelayanan publik. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(11), 2443–2451. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i11.489

Taufiq, M., Maya, S. E., Wiryanto, W., & Santoso, T. (2014). Kajian model reformasi birokrasi. Edisi Pertama. Pusat Kajian Reformasi Adminitrasi, Lembaga Administrasi Negara. http://ppid.lan.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/PRAKSIS-Kajian-Model-Reformasi-Birokrasi-di-Indonesia.pdf

Thoha, M. (2001). Perilaku organisasi: Konsep dasar dan aplikasinya. PT. Grafindo Persada.

Wahyuni, N., & Maesaroh, M. (2018). Analisis inovasi pelayanan di Kepolisian Daerah Jawa Tengah (Studi kasus Smile Police). Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 7(2), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.14710/jppmr.v7i2.19944

Widnyani, I. A. P. S. (2017). Pergeseran paradigma administrasi publik dalam pelayanan publik. SINTESA (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik), 8(2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.22225/sintesa.8.2.1060.93-102

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v7i2.7615