Konflik Norma Penolakan Euthanasia di Indonesia
Abstract
Problems in the Human Rights Law which only regulate the right to life and not the right to die. If interpreted broadly, the logic is that if the right to live exists, then the right to die must also exist. If the state legalizes forced deprivation of life by law, then the government should also regulate the legalization of death by its own will in the law. This study aims to examine how the basic considerations of judges in rejecting the Application for Injection of Death or Euthanasia in the Decision of the Banda Aceh District Court are viewed from the perspective of human rights and how the rejection of the Application for Injection of Death or Euthanasia in the Decision of the Banda Aceh District Court is viewed from the perspective of the values of justice . The method used in this study is normative juridical with the following results; The rejection of the application for lethal injection or euthanasia in the Berlin Silalahi case for researchers is a form of injustice and violates the purpose of making the law itself. Whereas euthanasia can be considered as a way to uphold the 'Right to live' by respecting the 'Right to die' with dignity. Furthermore, the application of the practice of euthanasia in Indonesia is actually possible to implement and can bring human rights supremacy in Indonesia closer. The supremacy of human rights here is interpreted to cover human rights as a whole which previously had not been included in positive law so that they could be contained in positive law in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Harlen, S. A. (2022, August 30). Pemenuhan Hak Santri atas Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia oleh Oknum Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal HAM, 13(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.199-214
Kumala Dewi, N. K. R. (2020, February 15). KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23444
Hastuti, N. T., & Dewi, R. W. L. (2005, April 27). EUTHANASIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA, ETIKA PROFESI KEDOKTERAN DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Perspektif, 10(2), 104. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v10i2.319
Rada, A. (2013, May 27). EUTHANASIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLA. Siregar, R. (2016, January 5). Eutanasia dan Hak Asasi Manusia. To-Ra, 1(3), 193. https://doi.org/10.33541/tora.v1i3.1145
A. Siregar, R. (2016, January 5). Eutanasia dan Hak Asasi Manusia. To-Ra, 1(3), 193. https://doi.org/10.33541/tora.v1i3.1145
Irianto, S. (2017, June 19). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DALAM METODOLOGI PENELITIAN ILMU HUKUM. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 32(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol32.no2.1339
Nurdiyanningrum, G. (2018, July 9). PENGHENTIAN TINDAKAN MEDIS YANG DAPAT DIKUALIFIKASIKAN SEBAGAI EUTHANASIA. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 3(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v3i1.2440
Wahid, S. H. (2019, October 22). Dinamika Fatwa Dari Klasik ke Kontemporer (Tinjauan Karakteristik Fatwa Ekonomi Syariah Dewan Syariah Nasional Indonesia (DSN-MUI).YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam,10(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v10i2.5831
Putri, R. A., Herman, R. B., & Yulistini, Y. (2015, May 1). Gambaran Penerapan Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia pada Dokter Umum di Puskesmas di Kota Padang. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.25077/jka.v4i2.274
Gracia, G., Ramadhan, D. A., & Matheus, J. (2022, February 1). Implementasi Konsep Euthanasia: Supremasi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Progresivitas Hukum di Indonesia. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v2i1.53730
Fios, F. (2012, April 30). Keadilan Hukum Jeremy Bentham dan Relevansinya bagi Praktik Hukum Kontemporer. Humaniora, 3(1), 299. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v3i1.3315
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26905/blj.v4i1.10307
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Bhirawa Law Journal Faculty of Law - University of Merdeka Malang Faculty of Law Building, Terusan Dieng Street 62-64 | Other Link | Follow Us | |||||
|
Bhirawa Law Journal This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |